Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:17 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,120,803 times
Reputation: 11095

Advertisements

Protecting the public interest in any economic "bailout"

The U.S. government has been turned into an engine that accelerates the wealth upwards into the hands of a few. The Wall Street bailout, the Iraq War, military spending, tax cuts to the rich, and a for-profit health care system are all about the acceleration of wealth upwards. And now, the American people are about to pay the price of the collapse of the $513 trillion Ponzi scheme of derivatives. Yes, that’s half a quadrillion dollars. Our first trillion dollar compression bandage will hardly stem the hemorrhaging of an unsustainable Ponzi scheme built on debt "de-leverages."
Does anyone seriously think that our public and private debts of some $45 trillion will be paid? That the administration's growth of the federal debt from $5.6 trillion to $9.8 trillion while borrowing another trillion dollars from Social Security has nothing to do with this? Does anyone not see that when we spend nearly $16,000 for every family of four in our society for the military each year that we are heading over the cliff?
This is a debt crisis, not a credit crisis. Just as FDR had to save capitalism after Wall Street excesses, we have to re-invigorate our economy with real - not imaginary - growth. It does not address the never-ending war on the middle class.
The same corporate interests that profited from the closing of U.S. factories, the movement of millions of jobs out of America, the off-shoring of profits, the out-sourcing of workers, the crushing of pension funds, the knocking down of wages, the cancellation of health care benefits, the sub-prime lending are now rushing to Washington to get money to protect themselves.
The double standard is stunning: their profits are their profits, but their losses are our losses.
This bailout will not bring real jobs back to America. It will not bring back jobs that make things. It does not rebuild our schools, streets, neighborhoods, parks or bridges. The major product of this financial economy is now debt. Industrial capitalism has been destroyed.
In the next few days I will push for a plan that includes equity for every American in any taxpayer investment in this so-called bail-out plan. Since the bailout will cost each and every American about $2,300, I have proposed the creation of a United States Mutual Trust Fund, which will take control of $700 billion in stock assets, convert those assets to shares, and distribute $2,300 worth of shares to new individual savings accounts in the name of each and every American.
I will also insist that all of the following issues be considered in whatever Congress passes:
Reinstatement of the provisions of Glass-Steagall, which forbade speculation
Re-regulation of the finance, insurance, and real estate industries
Accountability on the part of those who took the companies down:
a) resignations of management
b) givebacks of executive compensation packages
c) limitations on executive compensation
d) admission by CEO's of what went wrong and how, prior to any government bailout
Demands for transparencey
a) with respect to analyzing the transactions which took the companies down
b) with respect to Treasury's dealings with the companies pre and post-bailout
An equity position for the taxpayers
a) some form of ownership of assets
Some credible formula for evaluating the price of the assets that the government is buying.
A sunset clause on the legislation
Full public disclosure by members of Congress of assets held, with possible conflicts put in blind trust.
A ban on political campaign contributions from officers of corporations receiving bailouts
A requirement that 2008 cycle candidates return political contributions to officers and representatives of corporations receiving bailouts
And, most importantly, some mechanism for direct assistance to homeowners saddled with unreasonable or unmanageable mortgages, as well as protection for renters who have lived up to their obligation but fall victim to financial tragedy when the property they live in undergoes foreclosure.
These are just some thoughts on the run. You will hear more from me tomorrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:22 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,637,107 times
Reputation: 2893
I always liked Kucinich --- not a pandering bone in his body. I hope this gets passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,954,125 times
Reputation: 36644
Here is a more fascinating idea. Give every American $2,300 in cash, and let them decide whether to use it to bail out the banks. Of course, I know what they would do. They would head straight to Best Buy,and send there $2,300 straight back to China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Shaker Heights, OH
5,295 posts, read 5,239,871 times
Reputation: 4368
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Here is a more fascinating idea. Give every American $2,300 in cash, and let them decide whether to use it to bail out the banks. Of course, I know what they would do. They would head straight to Best Buy,and send there $2,300 straight back to China.
Just like what happened w/ out $600 rebate checks this summer.

You know, Kucinich has some very strange ideas at times, but I got to hand it to him, reading some of his posted proposal above, he seems to get it. Everything this gov't does for the "economy", is really only meant to benefit the wealthy more, while we the regular folks, get screwed more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Yes
2,667 posts, read 6,779,210 times
Reputation: 908
You know, big numbers such as 700 billion sound alot more intimidating than $2,300 from each citizen. Seriously? That's all 700 billion is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 01:01 PM
 
4,657 posts, read 8,710,823 times
Reputation: 1363
Kucinich is kinda likeable for such a kook, he's not a hater. He keeps talking about the shrinking of the "middle class" but he's so cozy with Big Union, which in my opinion is one of the main factors that the "middle class" is shrinking. He's gotta get out of their back pocket for me to take him seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 01:11 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,120,803 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonrise View Post
Kucinich is kinda likeable for such a kook, he's not a hater. He keeps talking about the shrinking of the "middle class" but he's so cozy with Big Union, which in my opinion is one of the main factors that the "middle class" is shrinking. He's gotta get out of their back pocket for me to take him seriously.
Can you explain a bit more about what you mean by "big Union?" Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 01:15 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,120,803 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
I always liked Kucinich --- not a pandering bone in his body. I hope this gets passed.
How can you not love and admire Kucinich? He's the guy who had the kutzpah to speak truth to power and introduce 35 articles of impeachment on the senate floor.

I supported him as a candidate, but the corporate media made sure that he was hardly acknowledged. Really a shame. Kucinich is a true patriot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 01:15 PM
 
4,657 posts, read 8,710,823 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Can you explain a bit more about what you mean by "big Union?" Thanks.
Well, we often here about the right being in the back pocket of Big Oil and Big Corporations, but the left is equally aligned to Big Union and Big Environment. DK, is a very, very big supporter of Big Union and they in turn endorse him like crazy. The problem is many, many unions have usurped their power and have become more powerful and corrupt then the companies that they are suppose to protect their workers from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 01:15 PM
 
Location: wrong planet
5,168 posts, read 11,437,138 times
Reputation: 4379
Always have liked Kucinich and his ideas, go Dennis !
__________________
The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for it. ~Henry David Thoreau


forum rules, please read them

Last edited by katzenfreund; 09-23-2008 at 06:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top