Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since you obviously have no comprehension of what a "Bible Belt Fanatic" or "Neo-Conservative" is, your arguement here is laughable
What an odd statement? Where is that he doesn't understand what a Bible belt fanatic is? Or what a Neo Con is? Could you post his quote that you take issue with?
I've always been disgusted with the republican scare tactics, and pandering to religious base... I think its underhanded and disgusting.. look at the hate it has spilled out of the mouths of its supporters...
gone are the days when people were just conservative in their principles... now days if you care about fiscal conservation... you have to swallow the whole abortion and jesus horse crap too...
People are seeing it for what it really is... and the republican party is a mess...maybe they can break into two parties..
I'm sorry.. but I cannot vote in line with people who say sarah palin is filled with the "holy spirit"
that is some serious koolaid drinking....
Since you obviously have no comprehension of what a "Bible Belt Fanatic" or "Neo-Conservative" is, your arguement here is laughable
What an odd statement? Where is that he doesn't understand what a Bible belt fanatic is? Or what a Neo Con is? Could you post his quote that you take issue with?
If he really knew what either meant, he wouldn't have posted that statement. If you knew what a "Fanatic" or "Neo-Conservative" really meant, you would realize neither represents the Republicans.
And for the record, myself and happ have a long "history" of tearing up each others posts and picking them apart. He might not know it, as he rarely responds, but I still do this. Check his posting history if you don't believe me.
If he really knew what either meant, he wouldn't have posted that statement. If you knew what a "Fanatic" or "Neo-Conservative" really meant, you would realize neither represents the Republicans.
And for the record, myself and happ have a long "history" of tearing up each others posts and picking them apart. He might not know it, as he rarely responds, but I still do this. Check his posting history if you don't believe me.
Just forget it.
The "precise language" argument.....boring!.......zitty 9th graders in Debate club grow old of this tired line.
If he really knew what either meant, he wouldn't have posted that statement. If you knew what a "Fanatic" or "Neo-Conservative" really meant, you would realize neither represents the Republicans.
And for the record, myself and happ have a long "history" of tearing up each others posts and picking them apart. He might not know it, as he rarely responds, but I still do this. Check his posting history if you don't believe me.
Thanks for the flattery
Your sense of history is appreciated but ancient [esp regarding New England]. I am merely following the trends in voting patterns across the nation. This is no put down on Republicans pe say but merely the reality that the GOP is a diminished party in the Northeast\New England [just like the West Coast]. McCain recently moved his campaign out of Michigan & Ohio and Pennsylvania don't look favorable for the GOP in many ways. When was the last time Indiana was even remotely leaning Democratic? A lot is changing & changing for the worse for Republicans.
Some of you guys are the left's version of right-wing fundies. More alike than different.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.