Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009, 11:37 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,582 posts, read 9,760,258 times
Reputation: 4172

Advertisements

I would support a "Fairness Doctrine"... as long as it is applied to ALL media: TV, Newspapers, movies, etc., as well as talk radio.

For every anti-Bush or pro-Obama screed Chris Matthews gives, there has to be a matching delivery from Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc.

For every appearance by George Stephanopolous on CNN, there has to be equal time for Glenn Beck, whom they must now re-hire and pay as much as they pay GS.

For every "news article" that praises a liberal Obama plan in the New York Times, LA Time etc., ther must be an equally long article, as prominently displayed, by Thomas Sowell or George Will etc.

For every movie showing company executives as evil or heartless, there must be a movie produced of equal length showing a company (like Wal-Mart for example) moving into a neighborhood, providing new jobs to people who didn't have them, providing lower prices and greater selection, etc., and people's lives improving as a result (which is actually the way it usually works).

For every rant by Rosie O'Donnell on The View, she must shut up and sit still without interrupting while Elizabeth Hasselbeck (or Phyllis Schlafly or Ann Coulter) delivers an equally-lengthy speech.

Etc. etc., you get the idea.

I can hardly wait for the leftists to praise this plan, as much as they praise the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" for radio only.

-----------------------------------

Actually, on second thought, I don't think I want Government to have the authority to examine everyone's speech, decide what is liberal or conservative, and decide who will be allowed to speak and who won't be, based on what has been said in the past.

I've changed my mind. There is NO version of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" I can support.

Never mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2009, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Wichita,Kansas
2,732 posts, read 6,754,899 times
Reputation: 1371
Great Post!
Notice how they only want it to apply to Talkradio?
I think if they actually pass this theres going to be a huge backlash!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 12:31 PM
 
419 posts, read 601,752 times
Reputation: 82
Not going to happen Obama doesnt support it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 12:41 PM
 
4,988 posts, read 9,984,413 times
Reputation: 3285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
I don't think I want Government to have the authority to examine everyone's speech, decide what is liberal or conservative, and decide who will be allowed to speak and who won't be, based on what has been said in the past.
Actually, a mechanism that does just this already exists. It's called the market! Free people will listen to what they want and will reward those ideas with profits. There is a reason liberal-babble doesn't attract widespread media markets and profits. Most people don't want to hear that their country sucks on an ongoing basis. It's likely that they will begin to tire of hearing this ongoing drone from Obama himself in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 12:41 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,582 posts, read 9,760,258 times
Reputation: 4172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont View Post
Not going to happen Obama doesnt support it
Meaning, if it gets attached to some other bill that he believes the nation "must have", he will sign it with regret.

Or at least a good imitation of regret.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 12:50 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,286,235 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Actually, on second thought, I don't think I want Government to have the authority to examine everyone's speech, decide what is liberal or conservative, and decide who will be allowed to speak and who won't be, based on what has been said in the past.

I've changed my mind. There is NO version of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" I can support.

Never mind.
Excellent conclusion.

Fair is a four letter liberal word meaning stacked deck.

The Liberals OWN that foul word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Wichita,Kansas
2,732 posts, read 6,754,899 times
Reputation: 1371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont View Post
Not going to happen Obama doesnt support it

Who knows they could try to slip it into some bill they pass in one..
Of their "Secret" Backroom deals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 01:11 PM
 
1,489 posts, read 2,029,229 times
Reputation: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont View Post
Not going to happen Obama doesnt support it

Nice try, Comrade.

Obama is going to use the machine to rename "the Fairness Doctrine", or have the thugs in Acorn scream for local regulation.

A lot of us are on to your ilk and your Fearless Leader. A lot more are going to be on to you and your Comrades in the weeks to come as Barry reveals himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 01:14 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,147,857 times
Reputation: 4882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Meaning, if it gets attached to some other bill that he believes the nation "must have", he will sign it with regret.

Or at least a good imitation of regret.
The White House said today that Obama does not support the so-called Fairness Doctrine. But I don't expect some folks here to believe that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 01:15 PM
 
419 posts, read 601,752 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by omle View Post
Nice try, Comrade.

Obama is going to use the machine to rename "the Fairness Doctrine", or have the thugs in Acorn scream for local regulation.

A lot of us are on to your ilk and your Fearless Leader. A lot more are going to be on to you and your Comrades in the weeks to come as Barry reveals himself.

I dont support Obama with his socialism. I am a Mod democrat that voted McCain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top