OCTOMOM! Contribute to Nadya's family at website ... (Iraq, interview, extremist)

[ParkTwain]

Contribute online or by US mail:

http://www.thenadyasulemanfamily.com/

You can also leave a comment for her to read.

Remarkable!

BEWARE! This website might be BOGUS. Her actual address is in Whittier, California, not L.A. But this website is referenced in a recent L.A. Times article:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...suleman-t.html

[chielgirl]

Dr. Phil was asking for donations yesterday on his show (don't know when it was aired in the States)... ridiculous.

[odanny]

I'm glad to hear the United States moving AWAY from the rightwing ideology of nutcases. The Bush Admin. was the other side of the coin, Ahmedinijad was on the other side (or maybe Bin Laden), all of them are extremist nutjobs.

Time for reality to replace ideology/religion/Republican inspired slavery

[aurorawatcher]

Well she is looking at doing porn now as a way to make money.

[rkb0305]

First of all, it is speculation to say she's shopping for a million dollar home. That was reported last week and it turned out she was just doing an interview in it. Second of all, shouldn't we all be happy if some private party is offering some financial support because that means it won't be on the tax payers. If someone is going to buy her a house, or give her money to buy a house, is that really a bad thing? Does she "deserve" it? No. But if the tax payers don't have to support them all, then who cares what she does?

[aurorawatcher]

I don't give a RA what she does really. They should put those children up for adoption in California.

[sanrene]

Why would it be disgraceful to prevent people like you and your ilk from using the pictures for your anti-war, anti-military, anti-US political agenda?

One organization, Military Families United, said a survey of military families found that 84% opposed changing the policy.

"We are pretty disappointed in the president's decision to overturn the ban," said John Ellsworth, the group's president, whose son was killed in Iraq in 2004. "This is a complete disregard for the will of America's military families and their need for privacy during this solemn moment."

But photographic images have been prohibited since 1991.

I wonder why Clinton didn't lift the ban?

[EinsteinsGhost]

Glad to see our brave get the recognition, that they are no longer considered to be no-name, nobody arriving home for the final time. It would give me an opportunity to salute them, instead them being brought in in complete darkness.

Glad to see this happen.

[sanrene]

Oh, yes, by all means, we should place your wants/needs/political agenda over the wishes of the families.

Typical liberal mentality.

[Upton]

Originally Posted by sanrene

Oh, yes, by all means, we should place your wants/needs/political agenda over the wishes of the families.

Typical liberal mentality.

Bush could of cared less about the families...if he had he wouldn't have sent thier sons and daughters off to fight and die in a meaningless war searching for some fictitious WMDs.

The only thing he worried about was public support for his murderous scheme....as photos of the dead would have surely brought pressure to bear on himself, Cheney and the rest of the adminstration's war criminals.