Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Iowa, Heartland of Murica
3,425 posts, read 6,294,711 times
Reputation: 3446

Advertisements

I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2009, 01:45 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,259,419 times
Reputation: 7621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
Gee didn't the Republicans try and do EXACTLY that when the French refused to go along with President Bush's call for action on Iraq?


FOXNews.com - Americans Just Say 'Non' to French Products - Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Arts And Entertainment

BBC NEWS | Business | 'No French food' for US Marines

FOXNews.com - Renewed Call to Boycott France - Bill O’Reilly | The O’Reilly Factor

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:12 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,456,548 times
Reputation: 8383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
But your trusted the lying bastard that just left Washington i bet. Me thinks you really really confused.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,083 posts, read 20,424,758 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
When he starts lying about WMDs then you might be on to something...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Fuquay-Varina
4,000 posts, read 10,817,137 times
Reputation: 3303
You should not trust any of them. Our gov't is a far cry from what the founding fathers set up for us, and it is a shame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:37 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,811,410 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
a little wisdom for you. dont be such a hypocrit....once upon a administration ago
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,059 posts, read 12,946,611 times
Reputation: 1401
I would never trust anyone who thinks FDR did a good job with the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:40 PM
 
4,573 posts, read 7,483,164 times
Reputation: 2613
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacredgrooves View Post
You should not trust any of them. Our gov't is a far cry from what the founding fathers set up for us, and it is a shame.
Unfortunately, the US gov't is like a zoo of crying, drunk, greedy monkeys who didn't their bananas in the morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,049 posts, read 34,517,363 times
Reputation: 10610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
Directing someone to the head of the FCC, in whose area of expertise the issue sits and who should be the best possible person to field a question like that, is avoidance? It sounds more like you're looking for reasons to distrust the President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:47 PM
 
1,255 posts, read 3,188,365 times
Reputation: 965
Trust Well I didn't Trust Clinton with NAFTA,I didn't Trust Bush with Iraq,and I sure as Heck DON"T Trust Obama with my country.

hillman
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top