Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-26-2009, 07:45 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,005,313 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

Anyone notice the OP has not been back to answer anything lately? I'd say another thread who's time has come and gone...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2009, 07:54 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,207 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:

Originally posted by Bill Keegan
I never claimed it was more than an insurance policy. But it's a policy written by a company that would get a lousy rating from any of the insurance rating agencies. Becasue it doesn't actually have to money to pay it's policy holders. Worse, we are all being forced to pay premiums on a policy that we will neve be able to collect on, because our premiums are needed to pay the guys drawing on it now.
Sure you did, you said
Quote:
"The average investor historically makes SOME profit on his investments."
Why do you confuse the two?

Quote:
Sure, it was greed & stupidity on the part of the people who paid into his scheme. And it appears to me to be just as stupid to pay into another scheme that can't possibly reward me at the end, just because it happens to be sponsored by our government.


Here again you are confusing an investment with insurance.


Quote:
The argument is a bit of a smokescreen on the issue of the wealthy being able to make themselves wealthy again. Most of his investors were older, and no longer have the same ability to take risks and make the big money again, nor the time frame to do so.
So the wealth will not end up back in the same hands, or lets stretch it a bit the same families?

Quote:
Also, it's possible that I haven't followed enough of the details of those who were taken in & lost money to him, but I haven't seen any of them demanding that the government make them whole. Would you share some of these please?
They have already demanded to be made whole. They claim Bush should have protected them.

On spell check I clipped one of your typos put it in blue sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2009, 07:56 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,207 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCyank View Post
Of course not...that was KevK and all the other folks in here who hate the rich and think they deserve to be forked. I merely clarified for you that he is indeed rich. You'll have to ask all the rich haters what they want to do about the unfortunate truth that Obama falls into the category of people that they want to pitchfork. I suppose they could keep the forking to only white rich folks...they could save Obama and Obama at the same time.

I wouldn't stab anyone, including a rich person.
Well it was you I quoted was it not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2009, 08:00 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,207 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Whining liberal defined.
That's your best shot, kind of a drive by with runny nose. If en your ask en me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2009, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Right where I want to be.
4,507 posts, read 9,061,904 times
Reputation: 3360
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
Well it was you I quoted was it not?
If you are talking about quoting me and then responding without regard to the context of my post then, yes. (In the previous post you made things up altogether and attributed them to me so I'm guessing context isn't your strong suit...especially since you are having the same problems with other posters)

If you are talking about quoting and using my statement in context, then no. At no time did I suggest stabbing anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2009, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
6,175 posts, read 12,936,822 times
Reputation: 4020
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
Sure you did, you said "The average investor historically makes SOME profit on his investments" Why do you confuse the two?
Confuse what two? Insurance & investments? No confusion on my part. Insurance policies are very often investments. Go ask anyone who sells whole life policies. And in most cases, the policyholder doesn't lose their principal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
Here again you are confusing an investment with insurance.
See above
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
So the wealth will not end up back in the same hands, or lets stretch it a bit the same families?
It may. What has that to do with anything?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
They have already demanded to be made whole. They claim Bush should have protected them.
As I said, I may have missed this. Show me. Please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
On spell check I clipped one of your typos put it in blue sorry.
Feel free to do wjhatever you feel like doing with my typos. Including going out of your way to point them out, if you feel that somehow does something for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2009, 10:30 PM
 
Location: The Shires
2,266 posts, read 2,292,870 times
Reputation: 1050
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Anyhow the rich didn't steal anything from us, the government -- the president and his congress have robbed us blind for their benefit. Those rich bankers, the corrupt housing industry and so on did not have the power to rob us, but the government does and used it's power.
So the rich aren't fleecing us for health insurance, for example? Or perhaps I should use the example of Florida Power & Light, who continue to jack up their prices, while making insane profits, because people need electricity.

It's not only the government that "steals"....just saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,021 posts, read 14,198,297 times
Reputation: 16745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomdude View Post
You go ahead and try to get a job without a social security number. Phone me up when you are picking peaches for $2 an hour.
Isn't it suspicious that despite the fact that there is NO LAW requiring all Americans to enroll in Socialist InSecurity, nor punishing one who does not participate, private sector employers are frightened of the Eye Are Us, and refuse to hire Americans who do not participate.

For the sake of argument, you write to your congressmen, and ask for a copy of the law. And they do not reply, nor answer. And you try to find the law yourself, and you cannot. What does that tell you about the American LEGAL system and "rule of law"?
What does that tell you about the "public servants" who are growing rich on the backs of suffering socialist peons?

Don't you think it is odd that government officials are living a lifestyle far above the people they serve?
Don't you think that they are somewhat aggressive in their efforts to ban weaponry from the people they serve?
Don't you think that perhaps someone wishes that "the people" don't wake up to the fact that they're voluntary slaves?
Or don't you think....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 10:12 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,016,008 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Isn't it suspicious that despite the fact that there is NO LAW requiring all Americans to enroll in Socialist InSecurity, nor punishing one who does not participate, private sector employers are frightened of the Eye Are Us, and refuse to hire Americans who do not participate.

For the sake of argument, you write to your congressmen, and ask for a copy of the law. And they do not reply, nor answer. And you try to find the law yourself, and you cannot. What does that tell you about the American LEGAL system and "rule of law"?
What does that tell you about the "public servants" who are growing rich on the backs of suffering socialist peons?

Don't you think it is odd that government officials are living a lifestyle far above the people they serve?
Don't you think that they are somewhat aggressive in their efforts to ban weaponry from the people they serve?
Don't you think that perhaps someone wishes that "the people" don't wake up to the fact that they're voluntary slaves?
Or don't you think....
And these are the folks that many want controlling our health care system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 10:22 PM
 
Location: The Shires
2,266 posts, read 2,292,870 times
Reputation: 1050
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Isn't it suspicious that despite the fact that there is NO LAW requiring all Americans to enroll in Socialist InSecurity, nor punishing one who does not participate, private sector employers are frightened of the Eye Are Us, and refuse to hire Americans who do not participate.

For the sake of argument, you write to your congressmen, and ask for a copy of the law. And they do not reply, nor answer. And you try to find the law yourself, and you cannot. What does that tell you about the American LEGAL system and "rule of law"?
What does that tell you about the "public servants" who are growing rich on the backs of suffering socialist peons?

Don't you think it is odd that government officials are living a lifestyle far above the people they serve?
Don't you think that they are somewhat aggressive in their efforts to ban weaponry from the people they serve?
Don't you think that perhaps someone wishes that "the people" don't wake up to the fact that they're voluntary slaves?
Or don't you think....
Not even the President makes anywhere near as much as the CEOs make. Government is actually pretty cheap, when you consider the sheer cost of other things such as healthcare in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top