U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-01-2009, 10:30 AM
 
Location: South FL
5,449 posts, read 6,702,369 times
Reputation: 3461

Advertisements

WASHINGTON - Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, said Wednesday that militant insurgents in Afghanistan are growing in strength but will be fought "relentlessly and aggressively" by bolstered American troops.

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on President Barack Obama's new strategy expanding the Afghan campaign, Petraeus said the United States would take the fight to the Taliban and insurgent forces in both Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan.

Afghan-Pakistan insurgents get stronger - Capitol Hill- msnbc.com
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2009, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,765 posts, read 26,251,811 times
Reputation: 12286
Not surprising at all. We started well, following 9/11, to cripple Al Qaeda by first dismantling a regime (Taliban) that supported the network, and then going after Al Qaeda. Then, we smelled oil and revenge. And turned around and went west, into Iraq. I felt bad for our military which had gotten a pretty good foothold in Afghanistan, but was now diverted away from it. Their primary efforts became secondary, and it provided an opportunity for the Taliban and Al Qaeda to regroup.

Pakistani involvement doesn't surprise me at all. The connection has existed for at least two decades, and then there is ISI towards which we turned a blind eye for way too long. ISI has had close ties with terrorist networks that operate against India (primarily Kashmir). This was acknowledged only recently. Pakistan's democracy had started to fail in the late 60s, and we supported the elements that were weakening it, with Nixon going against the woes of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and supporting everything that crooks in Pakistan dictated. Things have not been good there, at all. This mess has been in the making for a long time, and worsened by taking focus off Afghanistan/Al Qaeda in 2003.

Now we have a bigger region and mess to deal with, along with that ridiculous war in Iraq.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top