PROOF: Obama HIMSELF urged Democrats to PURGE moderate Democrats from Party! (McCain, enemy)

[JackTheRipper]

So..how many just prefer to believe that Mr. Obama had nothing to do with helping to destroy other Democrats?

He did, and in fact Obama urged the Socialist/Fascist wing of the Democrat Party to purge any and all Democrats that was not considered 'progressive' enough.

Perhaps the ignorant and the politically uneducated prefer to believe that Mr. Obama is just an idealist young man in politics with glowing intentions to make America better for all?

Mr. Obama made his case for the direction he wanted the Democrat Party to go (Socialist), and what he thought about moderate Democrats in the Daily KOS in 2005.

Naturally the Liberal Socialist Media will NOT continue to INVESTIGATE how Obama was the person RESPONSIBLE for driving a wedge in their own Party between the Leftist Socialist Democrats and the Moderate Democrats.

Perhaps this is exactly as to 'WHY' Hillary Clinton HAD to be placated and offered the position of 'Secretary of State'?

I'm tempted to believe however that IF anybody is successful at throwing out the Obama hard core Liberal Socialists (fascists) masquerading as 'Centrists', it most probably WILL be the BLUE-DOG Democrats working side by side WITH members of the GOP in the next Presidential election!

Did the RADICAL Socialist wing of the Democrat Party OVERPLAY their hand in ASSUMING those who all voted for Obama WANTED this type of fascist change that is also hell bent on DESTROYING the American Constitution?

You bet they OVERPLAYED their hand, and the Socialist TRAITORS involved in this SOCIALIST COUP are going to know it soon!

The Obama fascists might very well be on a political train wreck, ..they simply just don't know it..yet!

SEE BELOW:
__________________________________________________ ___________


Obama himself, writing for Daily Kos in 2005, made it clear that purging the Party of moderates was a goal of their “progressive” coup. Note the totalitarian language:

In order to beat them, it is necessary for Democrats to get some backbone, give as good as they get, brook no compromise, drive out Democrats who are interested in “appeasing” the right wing, and enforce a more clearly progressive agenda. (emphasis added)

The 2008 Hillary v. Obama race was really a big fight over the direction of the Democratic Party.

The Daily Kos and MoveOn.org crowd and other semi-sane groups believe that centrist Democrats are their real enemy. It was therefore acceptable and desirable for these ultra-left fanatics to use sexism and accusations of racism against Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Prior to smearing Hillary (and then Sarah Palin), these groups went after Sen. Joseph Lieberman. The Lieberman race in 2006 was the Beta test on destroying the moderate wing of the Party.

Now that their wholly inexperienced and incompetent candidate has been elected POTUS, the anti-American left is targeting the Blue Dog Democrats, namely Sen. Evan Bayh.

The problem, of course, is that the Obama-wing of the Democratic Party is attacking Democrats. Evan Bayh, a loyal supporter of Hillary, is being attacked by the same odious groups who attacked Hillary and then spread rumors about Sarah Palin, John McCain, Joe the Plumber, and Sen. Kristen Gilliard.

The internal contradictions of the new Obama Party are showing fissures.

Now begins the socialist purge.

The Anti-American Left Attacks Blue Dog Democrats « td blog

[delusianne]

"I completely agree that the Democrats need to present and fight for a clearly stated set of core convictions, and that we have not done so as effectively as we need to over the past several election cycles. We can insist on being principled about the ends we are trying to achieve (e.g. educational opportunity and basic health care for all Americans, honest and accountable government, etc.), without sacrificing our commitment to open debate, intellectual honesty, and civility. I think it's the right thing to do and I also think it will help us win.

"I also agree that it is the job of Democratic elected officials to help shape public opinion, and not just respond passively to opinion that's been aggressively shaped by the Republicans PR machinery. I am simply suggesting, based on my experience, that people will respond to a powerfully progressive agenda when its couched in optimism, pragmatism and our shared American ideals.

"Finally, some of you wondered whether I wrote the post myself. I did.

"Again, thanks for the comments. I look forward to continued dialogue in the future.

"(Cross-posted on the Senate blog: http://obama.senate.gov/blog/)"

Daily Kos: Thanks for the feedback

[msina]

Proof? From the Texa Darling Blog? This is an opinion piece by "budwhite".