Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wayne LaPierre sometimes does alright standing up for his side,sometimes he misses opportunity by not saying certain things.
Thr governor threw out statements and "statistics" that could have been smashed and the one quote that him,Feinstein,Clinton,Schumer,McCarthy and the rest all have used is "nobody needs one".If they are allowed to decide that with a blank check what stops them from deciding whatelse you "don't need?"
The governor and the others needs to be challenged to why they listed many types not even close to being "assault weapons" in their ban list and misuse the term "assault weapon".
And his statement about 40 cops shot by assault weapons (and that is questionable if they really were assault rifles or just reported to be so ) since the ban ended is misleading.During the 90's while the ban was in effect those 2 guys in California went on a shooting spree after robbing a bank with them,the guys in Columbine went on the spree while it was in effect,so how did the ban stop anything and if so how did the end of the ban allow cops since to be shot?
The governor needs to be reminded that Charles Witman used a hunting rifle and shotgun and killed more in that killing spree than most have done with a assault rifle.
The governor needs to reminded or debunked because many many people go to the range every week with the types of guns they want to ban and nobody ever gets hurt,so don't say nobody needs them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.