Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:34 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,141,005 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
But for some reason, you feel compassion for the poor billionaires.
As who does not, in these reform-wracked days?

Stay the course, billionaires! Oui, nous pouvons!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:35 AM
 
532 posts, read 1,231,519 times
Reputation: 139
This is a free country. If someone's goal is to become a millionaire (or billionaire) that's up to them (as long as they do it legally)

Government spending (as a percent of GDP) was 28% 50 years ago, 32% 10 years ago.
Obama has turned it into almost 45%.

Do you really feel like your getting that much more from your government?
Do you really feel gov should get more money of ours?

At this rate we will be a socialist country within about 3-4 years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:36 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,141,005 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
This is a free country. If someone's goal is to become a millionaire (or billionaire) that's up to them (as long as they do it legally)

Government spending (as a percent of GDP) was 28% 50 years ago, 32% 10 years ago.
Obama has turned it into almost 45%.

Do you really feel like your getting that much more from your government?
Do you really feel gov should get more money of ours?

At this rate we will be a socialist country within about 3-4 years
Do you read newspapers, Joey?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:40 AM
 
532 posts, read 1,231,519 times
Reputation: 139
In good times the liberal politican says:
The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. This is why we need more gov spending now

In bad times the liberal politician says:
Since where in a downturn gov needs to spend more to get the economy going.


There is always a lie as to why to increase government spending
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:28 PM
 
532 posts, read 1,231,519 times
Reputation: 139
Clinton was my favorite president. Obama is the worst thing ever for this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:30 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,842,040 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Two simple questions...

a) How big a deficit did BushII inherit?

b) How big a deficit did Obama inherit?

How big of a deficit is the president after Obama going to inherit. Wanna bet its more then the one Bush left Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:31 PM
 
532 posts, read 1,231,519 times
Reputation: 139
I don't know what your getting at, but it definitely seems irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:34 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,523,473 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
Increase per year in gov spending by president

Reagan $75 billion per year
Bush I $ 55 billion per year
Clinton $62 billion per year
Bush $121 billion per year increase
Obama $829 billion per year increase


If this isn't socialism in the works, I don't know what is
Not that I doubt these numbers, but would you cite your source please?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:36 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,523,473 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
If you are not alarmed by him increasing government spending by this amount, you must be an advocate of socialsim.

Obama is the friendly socialist.
I wish you guys would agree on a definition for "socialism." Nowhere in my studies have I seen "socialism" defined as "government spending beyond a certain amount."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:36 PM
 
532 posts, read 1,231,519 times
Reputation: 139
US Government Spending As Percent Of GDP in United States 1903-2010 - Federal State Local
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top