Ted Stevens (R) isn't neccessarily innocent, but he was wrongfully prosecuted by over zealous DA who appear to have used political ambitions to pervert justice.
Ollie North (R) was guilty as hell, but ACLU retroactively got him off on technicalities.
Diane Fienstien (D) might be guilty, but Washington Times yellow journalism might have contaminated any viable jury pool or legit investigation into the matter. Investigations have been used too often to further an opponents agenda. Editorial decree in headlines is a kangaroo court all it's own. Nothing indicates in the article exactly which law was broken.
Blago (D) was impeached and is facing criminal charges...
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/b...ich409ind.html
What consequence is there when corporate & private media is all too willing to pay charles manson, blago or ollie north for exclusive stories to cash in on notoriety? Crimes being very different, but all criminal just the same. Crime shouldn't pay as well as it does IMO.
http://www.charlesmansonfanclub.com/
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/b...040309.article
http://www.allbusiness.com/governmen...7427591-1.html
Should it really take an act of congress for basic ethics to prevail? Who authorized manson tshirts and who profits? Ollie North did take a bullet for Reagan administration IMO, but that's the honor among theives that deserves promotion on MSNBC and FOX alike???

$20 million in donations to a man in uniform who misappropriated funds???
