Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The sour grape thing is so old now that we have to call it sour raisins.
And we'll be glad to have him so that the GOP can stop filibustering the appointment of needed public officials (like the Secretary of Health) for no other earthly reason than to just say no.
Well one thing for sure is that the Dems will not have that 60 vote majority for long. Republicans will no doubt pick up senate seats in 2010.
I see...if a political approach gets your butt whipped to hell and back at the polls, do it more and you'll get a different result? I think that little theory deserves a test-- in 2010!
hey momonkey you started another thread about RINOs beware and ragged on Specter now instead of defeat for Specter he switched sides! Hahahahahahaha! This is golden! Now you can rename yourselves the G-NO-P!
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,514,805 times
Reputation: 2038
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsmoove
Well, this smacks of opportunism... just as bad as that fool Lieberman... but it's also a warning to Republicans... they risk being only the party of the Deep South and Midwest... though of course it's still's early.
Good point. The midwest is turning more or less purple though. The only place the GOP is now solid, is in the South (except for NC and FL). However, they are so stubborn in lots of ways, that I think that they will cater to those people and their narrow minded followers, which are, rich, fundlementalists or racists (red, not rednecks neccessarily).
That being said though, it's good news, but I won't be anti Specter, if he does not vote with the Dems 100% of the time, however, even most of the time is cool.
This better serve as a serious wake up call for the GOP, to come back towards the center.
Last edited by beenhereandthere; 04-28-2009 at 11:35 AM..
I think so too. Those people who turned out in droves to vote for Obama most likely won't turn out in 2010. Congressional democrats were riding Obama's coat tail last year.
Really? Were all those Dems riding Obama's coat tails back in the 2006 midterms, too?
I have no problem with him switching - he was dem-lite anyway.
He's still a coward with no real fundamental beliefs, but he's been that way for a while.
I wonder what committee chair they offered him.
Keep on cleansing of RINO's and dem-lites.
Translation: Keep on dwindling of Republican lawmakers, keep on empowering Democrats.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
