Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What most of you are forgetting is that the administration adhered to the legal opinion of the lawyers in the Justice Dept.
No one directed them to make the legal opinions that they did. As they put forth their legal opinions, Condi relayed that information to the relevant folks.
She did not create the opinion, although I'm sure she agreed with it.
What most of you are forgetting is that the administration adhered to the legal opinion of the lawyers in the Justice Dept.
No one directed them to make the legal opinions that they did.
What most of you are forgetting is that the administration adhered to the legal opinion of the lawyers in the Justice Dept.
No one directed them to make the legal opinions that they did. As they put forth their legal opinions, Condi relayed that information to the relevant folks.
She did not create the opinion, although I'm sure she agreed with it.
If Democrats think that this should be outlawed, they now have control of EVERY branch of government, they could easily ratify the agreement within days. Instead they'd rather grandstand, push blame, make accusations, cause an uproar, deflect from the truth, and then leave the procedures legal in the event they are needed in the future.
If Democrats think that this should be outlawed, they now have control of EVERY branch of government, they could easily ratify the agreement within days. Instead they'd rather grandstand, push blame, make accusations, cause an uproar, deflect from the truth, and then leave the procedures legal in the event they are needed in the future.
Preening is very important.
I never thought Condi particularly brilliant, despite the frequent cues from the media that that is the correct opinion of her.
But then I never thought Rummy was very bright either. Full of himself, yes. Bright, no.
Nor did I think Powell or Albright, or either Clinton (smartest people in the world at one point) were as brilliant as their media fawns would have the proles think.
Most are pretty mediocre intellects at best.
Yet another proof that IQ, and Harvard on the resume, don't necessarily mean you're very bright.
What most of you are forgetting is that the administration adhered to the legal opinion of the lawyers in the Justice Dept.
No one directed them to make the legal opinions that they did. As they put forth their legal opinions, Condi relayed that information to the relevant folks.
She did not create the opinion, although I'm sure she agreed with it.
This is a blatant lie, and easily proved so.
They tortured people first. They got the legal opinions second.
That the OP doesn't understand this means that she is completely unqualified to comment on the subject.
When your knowledge of history and current events is weak, Google is your friend.
I also notice that you did not ask Sanrene to prove the basis of the lie that she told. Why is that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
