Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should the govt break up the big banks?
Yes 14 43.75%
No 14 43.75%
Unsure 2 6.25%
Other 2 6.25%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2009, 11:37 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,317,131 times
Reputation: 1911

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Widowmaker2k View Post
No, the government should have left the banks alone from the beginning. There is no 'too big to fail,' that's an invention of government.
The liquidity crisis during the Great Depression shows a very strong argument why your claims are not just uneducated but ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2009, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Rural Northern California
1,020 posts, read 2,754,459 times
Reputation: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
The liquidity crisis during the Great Depression shows a very strong argument why your claims are not just uneducated but ridiculous.
How exactly? My assertation was that, had banks (Bank of America specifically) under the direction of the Feds, not bought the toxic assets of other failed companies (at more than market value), they would not have been in a position that required them to take bailout money. Why would we want to throw taxpayer money at bad business models and encourage banks to be reckless simply because we've deemed them 'too big to fail.' And furthermore, the global bank crisis of the 1930's wouldn't have been so bad had we not enacted the Smoot-Hawley act, which crippled trade between the United States and other nations, and precipitated an international run on banks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2009, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,460,647 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSU Tiger Z71 View Post
Companies and banks should be allowed to fail. It'd speed up this economic recovery.
or make it much much worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2009, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
11,839 posts, read 28,951,581 times
Reputation: 2809
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
or make it much much worse.
I don't think we've started to see " much worse" quite yet, but I'm sure that we will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,460,647 times
Reputation: 1200
Administration plans for end of ‘too big to fail’ - Stocks & economy- msnbc.com

may be happening sooner than we think...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 06:44 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,318,165 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
federal goverment 1st, get rid of the federal reserve and have congress start coining money again and you might, big might be right.
Better yet, the States should start minting coins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,904,593 times
Reputation: 1398
The Gov did the same thing ... sort of ... with Bell (AT&T) .. years back, thus creating a bunch of baby bells all over the place.

Companies, whether they be banks or not, should never be allowed to become so large and so intertwined that their failure would mean world monitary collapse ..

This whole business smells a bit like the Glass/Steagall Act to me ... and that's a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,345,485 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post

Break up?

Just return them to being local banks and savings & loans, and not everything else on a national scale.

They got into the Credit Card business, the real estate business, and just about anything that they thought they could make money.

They were allowed to cross state lines, in quest of growth.

Of course they had a hand from government who changed laws that were made to keep this from happening, for the benefit of the banks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,345,485 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskydude View Post
The Gov did the same thing ... sort of ... with Bell (AT&T) .. years back, thus creating a bunch of baby bells all over the place.

And that worked well until the Bell's convinced the Gov, that they didn't need the oversite and regulations. And now we are back to one major phone company (the former SBC now ATT)

Of course the head ringmaster of the merging of the bells is now on the New GM board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2009, 09:20 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,471,872 times
Reputation: 29337
Perhaps one of the reasons Texas isn't foundering like many other states is because, unless it's changed, banks have to be independent and don't have branches.

Too big to fail is too big and powerful by far!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top