Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2009, 01:29 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

Post'em if You Got'em.

May 11, 2001

Representative Pete Sessions of Texas, Obama is not trying to create jobs. In an interview, Mr. Sessions cited rising unemployment in asserting that the administration intended to “diminish employment and diminish stock prices” as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy to consolidate power. Sessions, said Mr. Obama’s agenda was “intended to inflict damage and hardship on the free enterprise system, if not to kill it.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/11/us...ucus.html?_r=1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2009, 01:35 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,052,273 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Post'em if You Got'em.

May 11, 2001

Representative Pete Sessions of Texas, Obama is not trying to create jobs. In an interview, Mr. Sessions cited rising unemployment in asserting that the administration intended to “diminish employment and diminish stock prices” as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy to consolidate power. Sessions, said Mr. Obama’s agenda was “intended to inflict damage and hardship on the free enterprise system, if not to kill it.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/11/us...ucus.html?_r=1
Too bad Sessions is in on the whole thing. He is a Republican that gets money from the RNC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 01:41 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 3,246,905 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Post'em if You Got'em.

May 11, 2001

Representative Pete Sessions of Texas, Obama is not trying to create jobs. In an interview, Mr. Sessions cited rising unemployment in asserting that the administration intended to “diminish employment and diminish stock prices” as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy to consolidate power. Sessions, said Mr. Obama’s agenda was “intended to inflict damage and hardship on the free enterprise system, if not to kill it.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/11/us...ucus.html?_r=1
Those dastardly Democrats... their plan all along was to sabotage the economy while they controlled the Presidency and Congress so that the public would... blame Republicans! Brilliant strategy from that Harvard guy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 01:48 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
There are lot of arguments that can be made about the cause and differing approaches for bring about economic recovery but the GOP continues to avoid that discussion instead relying on these mind numbing... I'm at a loss for words - idiotic arguments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 01:49 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,052,273 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
There are lot of arguments that can be made about the cause and differing approaches for bring about economic recovery but the GOP continues to avoid that discussion instead relying on these mind numbing... I'm at a loss for words - idiotic arguments.
you are right. Instead of offering solutions they came across as only detractors. They offered nothing in alternative and they will pay the price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 02:07 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
There are lot of arguments that can be made about the cause and differing approaches for bring about economic recovery but the GOP continues to avoid that discussion instead relying on these mind numbing... I'm at a loss for words - idiotic arguments.
Odly enough the Associated Press came out with a story today claiming that Pete Sessions is correct, that the jobs that are going to be created are in areas where they are not needed..

STIMULUS WATCH: Jobs, but not where needed most (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090511/ap_on_re_us/us_stimulus_left_out - broken link)

If the stimulus was about jobs, they would be spending it in areas with the highest unemployment rates, not the lowest, now thats idiotic...

p.s. tell me when Republicans were invited to discuss the topic? Every story I hear is about how Democrats have meetings and exclude Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 02:52 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Odly enough the Associated Press came out with a story today claiming that Pete Sessions is correct, that the jobs that are going to be created are in areas where they are not needed..
The article does absolutely nothing to substantiate Session's comment! In point of fact it refutes his point, despite the fact that the author of the story misses this obvious point as well. Had the construction funds been utilized to consolidate Obama's "power" then the money would have been targeted towards Obama's key constituents, the stimulus money was given to the states who in turn target where they determine the money is to be used. It shouldn't be surprising then that money, like most state funds, are being targeted not at the most needy but the most politically powerful (see suburban and affluent communities).

From the article;

"The problem comes from the fact that the bill was not written right in the first place," said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn. "And the bill not addressing where the money is needed to go, but just addressing, 'Let's get this money out of here as quickly as we can.'"

I dare say that had the administration asked that the stimulus moneys been determined by Washington, the GOP would have been howling about the dictatorial policies of Washington that ignored the special understanding of the states on how money should be spent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2009, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,059 posts, read 12,970,206 times
Reputation: 1401
Democrat idiocy of the decade: ACORN.

'Nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2009, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth
358 posts, read 472,320 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViewFromThePeak View Post
Democrat idiocy of the decade: ACORN.

'Nuff said.
Republican idiocy of the last 50 years: Republicans...

'Nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2009, 06:48 AM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,052,273 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi Horse View Post
Republican idiocy of the last 50 years: Republicans...

'Nuff said.
You have no idea what the Republican platform was 50 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top