Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't understand why with so many of you people, everything is so black and white. Abortion isn't a black and white issue, you don't necessarily have to be 100% for or against it. I am against random whores using abortion over and over so that they don't have to be more careful with their choices, however I feel that if a young child makes a mistake, a mothers life is at danger, a woman was raped, etc they should have the ability to terminate the pregnancy. Complex issues are rarely a simple yes/no answer. I wish more people would realize this.
It is black and white. Just like the death penalty. You either believe that the fetus is a distinct human life from the mother or you do not. If you do not believe that the fetus is a distinct human life, then the reason for the abortion does not matter. If you do believe that it is a distinct human life, then there are no cases where abortion would be legal other than when the mother's life would end if she carried to viability. Given modern medicine, that would be very rare...
If you do believe that it is a distinct human life, then there are no cases where abortion would be legal other than when the mother's life would end if she carried to viability.
You miss the point:
1. Abortion is legal. [Attempts to make it illegal have failed.]
2. Even is abortion were illegal, it would happen. [Attempts to prevent it from happening have failed.]
Now, as a responsible public official, what do you do?
Bill Clinton said it should be made safe, available and rare. That's one viewpoint.
Others choose to go out in the street and protest against folks who support abortion rights. Some folks promote abstinence-only programs (which don't work), some folks promote adoption, self-restraint and self-respect among young women.
The situation is not hardly black and white as to dealing with the facts of the situation.
3 anti-life/pro-death people have already posted on this thread....probably about 100 more to go as usual
This is where my problem lies...
No one is anti-life/pro-death.
In that is the case, then you would be the same, since I am guessing that you voted for someone who instigated a senseless war.
Love the fetus/Hate the child? What about that 19 year old soldier who lost his life fighting a lie in Iraq...or the children in Iraq who have lost their lives?
What about the children who are abused EVERYDAY due to parents who are incapable to parent?
Do you advocate for them as much as you want to argue over a woman's personal right to choose what she does with her body?
This whole abortion debate ignores a fact: There is philosophy and there is realpolitik. Philosophically, who could be in favor of a woman terminating a pregnancy? I think very few people could be happy with that happening.
Then there is reality: Abortion and termination of pregnancy has been with society since before the dawn of recorded history.
So abortion is going to happen and did so before Roe v. Wade. Anyone here remember that Frank Sinatra's mom had two convictions for performing illegal abortions? That stuff about coat hangers and illegal 'scrapes' was real life, scary and it happened.
And, abortion happens to be legal in these United States of America. At base, the president should work on making abortion safe and rare. And I have seen very little of stress in those areas by anti-abortion protesters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagran
1. Are you in favor of random whores having child after child? Random whores don't sound like women who would make the best mothers, but then, who knows?
2. Do you think random whores should be forced to give birth as a means for teaching them a lesson?
3. Do you think random whores should be punished for not making better choices by being forced to give birth?
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne
So how would you legislate this moralistic POV? How would you as a jurist define and identify a random ***** who shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion, or let his girlfriend have one?
Ya know if you guys don't quit throwing around all that logic and common sense you're going to scare the Anti-Choice, Anti-Individual Liberties, Anti-Freedom, Pro-"women are just breeding animals " crowd !!!
Ya know if you guys don't quit throwing around all that logic and common sense you're going to scare the Anti-Choice, Anti-Individual Liberties, Anti-Freedom, Pro-"women are just breeding animals " crowd !!!
And when they're scared they pull out their guns, to perform a late-late term abortion or ten.
This forum is full of child-molesters. since when is a girl in her early/mid teens healthy enough to give birth?
No...I think you need to pick up a biology book and a newspaper and do some reading. Girls in their early and mid teens are having babies every day.
Now if you want to ask the different question of who are the boys or men that are getting them pregnant, then as a father of a 15 year old and 11 year old girl, I would agree.
No one here is a child molester...you just need to put down the Xbox and join the world of reality.
if one of the obama children have an abortion when they are older, or any female for that matter, is no ones business but theirs.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.