Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should parents be allowed to deny life saving treatment to thier children?
Yes 19 25.68%
No 41 55.41%
Unsure 9 12.16%
Other 5 6.76%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2009, 05:16 PM
 
1,788 posts, read 4,754,627 times
Reputation: 1253

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
4. I've not read anywhere that his parents believe he is a shaman and tribal elder. Perhaps you can provide a citation on that. What I have read is that his parents sought medical treatment when he became ill, and that the first round of chemo and radiation therapy was painful to the point he wanted to discontinue. His parents decided to try an alternative therapy. That therapy seems to have been detrimental to his condition, but the parents and the boy are reluctant to return to the chemo/radiation the doctors feel is his best choice.
His mother testified to that effect.

Judge rules family can't refuse chemo for boy (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090515/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo - broken link)

Look on the positive side though...since his parents are going to let him die, he won't add anything defective to the gene pool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2009, 05:28 PM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,523,345 times
Reputation: 1734
Quote:
[I don't impose my beliefs. I give my children alternatives and choices. I tell them, "Some people believe in heaven, some people do not. You ask all the questions you need to make up your own mind."

I give them power and choice to determine things within their understanding and ability.
[/quote]

Yes you are imposing your own beliefs on your child. When you "guide" your child, you are actually slanting him in the direction you want him to pursue.

The other thing is, there are axioms that you just have to accept to be true. 1 + 1 will always be 2. You can't tell your child he is free to answer 3 if he wants to (just because according to you, he has the inherent and inalienable right to voice his opinion). Jumping out of a plane from 30,000 feet without a parachute will almost always lead to certain death, and refusing chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease will almost always kill the patient.

The laws of nature are consistent that way. Mother nature is indifferent to your absolutist beliefs about individual rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,729,686 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarmig View Post
Without getting into details, it was unexpected, it was a shock, and they feel the loss.

Unlike many households, we do not shy away from discussions about death.
Get off your parenting high horse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarmig View Post
They can't reach the pedals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
Can't reach the pedals? Why should you let a minor technical difficulty impede your 5 yr old child's ability to assert his right to drive a car? I'm sure a mechanical solution can be found.
Well, hell, yes. Blocks, for instance. I remember some dumb-bunny father of an 8 yr old, just a little older than your oldest, scarmig, who "taught" her how to fly a plane that way. When they went to fly it, she crashed it and killed them both. This was in Wyoming, I believe, a number of years ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarmig View Post
Because seventeen years, three-hundred and sixty-four days, twenty-three hours and fifty-nine minutes into your life, you are utterly incapable of having any decision-making capability over your body. But one minute later, you are immediately and utterly competent to make any and all decisions without question?
Heck, no, they're not totally competent at 18 years of age. But more competent than a 13 yr old.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So, under eighteen, absolutely no say in the medical care you receive.

What if a sixteen-year-old girl had a genetic cervical anomaly, and she accidentally became pregnant? Her doctor is of the opinion that she cannot support a pregnancy, and that at some point in the third trimester, her cervix will hemorhage and she's at risk for dying. Her doctor wants to abort the child and also perform a hysterectomy. It's a life and death matter. She and her parents are opposed.

You've just stated unequivocally that the child has "no right to refuse" treatment intended to save her life and that right should not be shifted to the parent.

Do you still think so?
Actually, pregnant females are generally allowed to make decisions about the pregnancy even if they are underage. It's one of those "gray areas". So not so great of an example.

Here is another link on children and death, from another belief system:

Talking to Children about Death

"preschool children usually see death as reversible, temporary, and impersonal. Watching cartoon characters on television miraculously rise up whole again after having been crushed or blown apart tends to reinforce this notion."

2 - 6 Years Old: Family is centre of child's world – Confident family will care for her needs – Plays grown-ups, imitates adults. – Functions on a day-to-day basis. – No understanding of time or death – Cannot imagine life without mum or dad – Picks up on non-verbal communication. – Thinks dead people continue to do things (eat, drink, go to the bathroom), but only in the sky – Thinks if you walk on the grave the person feels it – Magical thinking: you wish it, it happens (bring the dead back or wishing someone was dead) – Death brings confusion, guilt [magically thought someone dead] – Tendency to connect things which are not related.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: 53179
14,416 posts, read 22,480,960 times
Reputation: 14479
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarmig View Post
Of course not. You make sure the person understands what death is. You make sure the person understands that without the medicine they will probably die. You determine the intent of the person, whether they want to live or die. Then you explain what is necessary to achieve that intent, and at what cost, and make it happen.

That's the role of a guardian/parent/teacher in this whole debacle.

This 13 year old boy is mentally challenged. Do you think he understand he is about to die?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:05 PM
 
Location: 53179
14,416 posts, read 22,480,960 times
Reputation: 14479
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I don't think we have enough information to truly know what's going on in this case. But I think that all of these cases are more complex and less cut and dried than they appear at first reading.

This kids cancer is very survivable if he gets his treatment. If he does not get the treatment he has 5 % chance of survival. Thats a fact!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by glass_of_merlot View Post
This kids cancer is very survivable if he gets his treatment. If he does not get the treatment he has 5 % chance of survival. Thats a fact!
Which is why the state needs to step in

A 13 year old CHILD should not be permitted to refuse treatment, nor should his parents be permitted to refuse it for him. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,850,918 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
Well, parents should have the right to make decisions for their kids...unless society as a whole, or government, or some other entity that has no business inserting itself in the matter, says different.

If you had kids, would you want to let the government raise them? Let the government make all the decisions on how they are to be raised? Then why should the government get to tell anyone what to do with their kids?
I totally agree, I am a parent and I want what's best for my son. I choose what is good for him, yes I ask other good parents their opinions but the final say is mine. Only another parent would understand. I work with other non-parents and they are soooo judgemental on parenting a kid and how they look, act, ect. I keep reminding them thats what I thought until...I had a child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,014,202 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Which is why the state needs to step in

A 13 year old CHILD should not be permitted to refuse treatment, nor should his parents be permitted to refuse it for him. Period.
************************************************** *********

Exactly...the sheriff doesn't want to arrest her, simply to get treatment for the boy. My best friend had Hodgkin's; she died before we turned 40, in spite of excellent and rapid treatment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,850,918 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Maybe the public should bug out and let the little bugger die. That would cost us a lot less.
Do you have a child? Then shut the hell up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,850,918 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Abortion is VERY different from this.
A fetus in the first trimester will not survive outside the womb.
This little boy has GREAT prospects for survival if he receives chemo.
I too think the mother should rethink helping the child. But do you see what chemo does to people extremely weak, don't want to eat,lose tons of weight and some times chemo alone can kill you. you have to be strong to make it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top