Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2009, 04:26 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,583,124 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geechie North View Post
.

I'm no longer in the 60's, but SC's white population is just entering the 1950's.

SC school's resegregated in the 80's.
http://people.hofstra.edu/alan_j_sin...D.%20Brown.pdf

In my hometown (Charleston) the number of students in the district where I went has tripled, yet the number of HS's has been halved.

How is that?

Private, white, acadamies
I'm from Charleston and went to school in the 80's too. The schools where I live halved because they combined two into one which certainly didn't segregate anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2009, 05:44 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,904 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
I'm from Charleston and went to school in the 80's too. The schools where I live halved because they combined two into one which certainly didn't segregate anything.
.

I went in the 60's.

Yeah, they combined two high schools which now has about 300 more kids than when I went there, and meanwhile the number of high-school aged kids in the district tripled.


Where have ther rest gone?

Private, most segregated schools.

Or else they drop out, 'cause SC just don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 05:45 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geechie North View Post
Suggest you read about "Gentrification" and the "I-95 corridor".

It's racism causing the state not to give a damn about the financials, largely.
Sounds like a LOCAL problem to me, Dont like your LOCAL problem

MOVE!!!

p.s. School TAXES are taxed LOCALLY, to support the LOCAL schools, not to support the "state schools"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 05:47 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,904 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Sounds like a LOCAL problem to me, Dont like your LOCAL problem

MOVE!!!
Suggest you look up the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and how the South was able to get around it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 05:49 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geechie North View Post
Suggest you look up the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and how the South was able to get around it.
The Civil Rights Act banned discrimination, giving people the right to MOVE wherever they wanted...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 07:32 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,904 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The Civil Rights Act banned discrimination, giving people the right to MOVE wherever they wanted...
A one song, I see.

This about Sanford turning down stim $ to fan the rabble, while kids lose out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 07:36 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geechie North View Post
A one song, I see.

This about Sanford turning down stim $ to fan the rabble, while kids lose out.
You think kids dont lose out when they are saddled with TRILLIONS of dollars in debt that THEY, yes THEY have to pay back because WE are being ilresponsible?

Sorry but Governor Sanford is 100% correct on this issue, and if you werent here supporting the sellout of our kids future, than maybe you would understand the difference and understand how SCHOOLS are STATE functions, and Obama has NOTHING to do with it..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,176 posts, read 19,189,687 times
Reputation: 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You think kids dont lose out when they are saddled with TRILLIONS of dollars in debt that THEY, yes THEY have to pay back because WE are being ilresponsible?

Sorry but Governor Sanford is 100% correct on this issue, and if you werent here supporting the sellout of our kids future, than maybe you would understand the difference and understand how SCHOOLS are STATE functions, and Obama has NOTHING to do with it..
Let's get one thing straight.

Sanford's objection was not that the money would put the put the country in debt, but that he could not spend it like he wanted to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 11:00 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,583,124 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geechie North View Post
.

I went in the 60's.

Yeah, they combined two high schools which now has about 300 more kids than when I went there, and meanwhile the number of high-school aged kids in the district tripled.


Where have ther rest gone?

Private, most segregated schools.

Or else they drop out, 'cause SC just don't care.
What tells you that it's about race? Couldn't it be that the public schools are not doing well, so parents that can afford it send their kids someplace else? I'm willing to bet that there are more private schools in the northeast than the south. Are they racist too or does that only apply to the south? Obama's kids go to a private school; I take it he's racist, as are the Clintons etc.

If the number of kids has tripled, I would assume that the number of families has increased as well. If only 300 of them go to public school, then the schools should be pretty well funded per capita because the property taxes of all those other families are going to pay for the 300 to attend the school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 11:03 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,583,124 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
Let's get one thing straight.

Sanford's objection was not that the money would put the put the country in debt, but that he could not spend it like he wanted to.
And the way he wanted to was to pay down debt versus apply it as mandated and be left afterwards with increased finacnial obligation and no ability to pay for it (aka more debt). It was about the state's ability to cover what would have been mandated by taking the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top