U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 05-29-2009, 05:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
1,646 posts, read 733,395 times
Reputation: 589
JennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to allJennySquirrel is a name known to all
Default Restructure Welfare & Leave My Health Care Alone!

Everyone of us knows of the abuse of Welfare. Generation after generation on the "card". Have another baby to get more money. Sneak over the border and you will be covered. I personally have turned people in and they were never even contacted! This IS one of the main reasons we are in such bad shape economically.

With that said, why doesn't Obama and his goons target Welfare and clean that up. Investigate fraud, start work programs and "escort" those people who can, back to work. Get them off the system and not encourage people to get on the system.

I think no matter which "team" you cheer for, you would have to agree that this would cut our budget and help stop the out of control flow of money to people who could be working.

Focus on this and leave my health care alone. Each of us are already paying $1,000 a year to cover people who don't have insurance and now Obama wants to rip it all apart and turn the health care field upside down to insure even more people.

Fine, but fix welfare BEFORE you start to mess with the working people's insurance who are already paying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2009, 10:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
573 posts, read 138,607 times
Reputation: 192
mwruckman has a spectacular aura aboutmwruckman has a spectacular aura aboutmwruckman has a spectacular aura aboutmwruckman has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by JennySquirrel View Post
Everyone of us knows of the abuse of Welfare. Generation after generation on the "card". Have another baby to get more money. Sneak over the border and you will be covered. I personally have turned people in and they were never even contacted! This IS one of the main reasons we are in such bad shape economically.

With that said, why doesn't Obama and his goons target Welfare and clean that up. Investigate fraud, start work programs and "escort" those people who can, back to work. Get them off the system and not encourage people to get on the system.

I think no matter which "team" you cheer for, you would have to agree that this would cut our budget and help stop the out of control flow of money to people who could be working.

Focus on this and leave my health care alone. Each of us are already paying $1,000 a year to cover people who don't have insurance and now Obama wants to rip it all apart and turn the health care field upside down to insure even more people.

Fine, but fix welfare BEFORE you start to mess with the working people's insurance who are already paying.


You probably have employer paid health insurance. Ever ask yourself what will happen to you if your employer wants to restructure your insurance? In other words empower you by making you pay for all of your healthcare out of your own wages?. Ever hear of a healthcare savings acounts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 11:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
1,969 posts, read 727,393 times
Reputation: 491
Okiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of lightOkiegirlfriend is a glorious beacon of light
We do pay for all our health insurance and it ain't cheap. I would much rather continue this option than go with universal stealth care. I want medical services when I need them, not when the government thinks I need them. I would prefer not having a chronic illness, but I can't change my genes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 12:08 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Be Cool, Soda Pop" (set 24 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
518 posts, read 344,679 times
Reputation: 148
PeteyNice will become famous soon enoughPeteyNice will become famous soon enoughPeteyNice will become famous soon enough
So you would rather get medical services when your for-profit insurance company deems that you need them?

Noone is talking about "banning" private insurance. *Noone*. The idea is to offer a public plan. If you would rather pay more for your private insurance noone will stop you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 12:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
1,921 posts, read 948,313 times
Reputation: 534
JoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of light
you're the BILLION in corporate welfare is insane

Oh wait, you would rather trump up Reagan's welfare queens instead because that makes you feel better than what really is hurting us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 12:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
4,275 posts, read 1,411,434 times
Reputation: 1079
padcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud of
Universal healthcare is cheaper and it covers everyone.

In 2008, the United States will spend 17 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care. It is projected that the percentage will reach 20 percent by 2017.1
Although nearly 46 million Americans are uninsured, the United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations, and those countries provide health insurance to all their citizens.3
Health care spending accounted for 10.9 percent of the GDP in Switzerland, 10.7 percent in Germany, 9.7 percent in Canada and 9.5 percent in France, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.4

http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 12:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
4,275 posts, read 1,411,434 times
Reputation: 1079
padcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud of
The US system of healthcare is ranked far below other countries univeral single payer systems.


The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 12:58 PM
Our Democracy is Being Stolen!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: state of contentment
4,033 posts, read 2,654,113 times
Reputation: 1400
southward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud ofsouthward bound has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Universal healthcare is cheaper and it covers everyone.

In 2008, the United States will spend 17 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care. It is projected that the percentage will reach 20 percent by 2017.1
Although nearly 46 million Americans are uninsured, the United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations, and those countries provide health insurance to all their citizens.3
Health care spending accounted for 10.9 percent of the GDP in Switzerland, 10.7 percent in Germany, 9.7 percent in Canada and 9.5 percent in France, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.4
NCHC | Facts About Healthcare - Health Insurance Costs
It may be "cheaper" but it won't give us a good return on our money. It has been said that the bitter after taste of cheap lasts far longer than the initial sweet taste of cheap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
4,275 posts, read 1,411,434 times
Reputation: 1079
padcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud of
This is what right wingers want for Americans. This is what they are bragging about all the time.

This poster above from Oklahoma. This is just what rural Oklahoma is like. Poor whites who don't have healthcare.

This is what she wants for her poor Red State.


YouTube - 60 Minutes - Remote Medical Access
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 01:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
4,275 posts, read 1,411,434 times
Reputation: 1079
padcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud ofpadcrasher has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
It may be "cheaper" but it won't give us a good return on our money. It has been said that the bitter after taste of cheap lasts far longer than the initial sweet taste of cheap.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Europeans and Canadians would never go to our system. They think it is barbaric for a wealthy country do this to it's less fortunate citizens.

Survival of the fittest. Dog eat dog. That's what you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top