U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-15-2009, 03:27 PM
Beltway Brat
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston-Memorial & Cherokee County
5,088 posts, read 3,524,856 times
Reputation: 1106
EasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud ofEasilyAmused has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Meanwhile, for the sheeple (otherwise known as liberals), global warming is just another feel-good, warm and fuzzy coat-tail to jump on and ride in their attempt to blame the United States for the world's ills.
..while they run around insisting that mercury filled light bulbs should be manditory to help save the planet. Of course totally dismissing the fact that 75% of them will end up in land fills, thus the water supply, rather that triple baggied and disposed of at designated sites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2009, 08:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: mancos
1,814 posts, read 396,125 times
Reputation: 459
parfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of lightparfleche is a glorious beacon of light
this has been the coldest june i can remember still got the top on the jeep and my tomatos frooze.at least in CO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 09:11 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Say NO to censorship!" (set 8 days ago)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central Illinois -
4,655 posts, read 1,414,436 times
Reputation: 1313
odanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
In fact, from 1895 through 1979 the annual US average temperature dropped 0.01 Deg F per decade. That's right, it got colder at a time when atmospheric CO2 levels were increasing. But wait, It gets more incredible. From 1953 through 1979 average US temperature dropped 0.40 Deg F per decade leading climatologist of the 1970s to warn of an impending Ice Age. Now consider the Ice Agers looking at temperature data from 1953 to 1979. If that trend continued, we would have lost a staggering 1.20 Deg F since 1979 and be facing near certain extinction from the run away global cooling. If we focus in on the change from 1979 through 2006 we find that the average US temperature increased by a rate of 0.58 Deg F per decade. But the story here isn't that the hottest decade was the late 1990s and early 0s or is it that 1998 was the hottest year in recorded history. The real story is that 1979 was the coldest year in recorded history and 1998 was the warmest. Since 1998 the average annual US temperature has dropped by a rate of 0.77 Deg F per decade. So I have to ask the obvious question, Is Al (stands-to-make-a-lot-of-money) Gore correct or are the Ice Agers correct? I say neither since the US temperature in 1908 averaged 52.82 Deg F and the one for 2008 was 53.02 Deg F. It is exactly 0.20 Deg F hotter today than it was 100 years ago. Global warming is a hoax.

UNITED STATES Climate Summary
What is wrong with you people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 09:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
3,979 posts, read 701,167 times
Reputation: 802
Wapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to behold
As long as the sun is sleeping, the world will keep being below normal, temperature wise.

http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/...spots_1024.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 09:34 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Nature 3 Nurture 1 - Game over" (set 27 days ago)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
1,122 posts, read 383,819 times
Reputation: 574
robertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to allrobertjohnson is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Pretending that global warming is a hoax is a hoax. See Creation Science for details...
I betcha did tons of research before you decided g.w. was genuine, huh?
Yep, studied both sides long and hard. And after a period of deep thought and fasting came to your conclusion. And still, after all that careful study,
your still on the lookout for any new information that would illuminate this
issue. Your just that kind of guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 11:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
3,979 posts, read 701,167 times
Reputation: 802
Wapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to behold
Sucks to be one of the flock of AGW church goers these days

Quote:
Inclusion of fundamental ecological interactions between the terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles in the land component of an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model (AOGCM) leads to increased carbon storage on land under radiatively-forced anthropogenic climate change, and an overall negative climate-carbon cycle feedback. The primary mechanism responsible for increased land carbon storage is shown to be fertilization of plant growth by increased mineralization of nitrogen directly associated with increased decomposition of soil organic matter under a warming climate. Results from the fully-coupled AOGCM also confirm a previously reported pattern of significantly reduced CO2-fertilization of terrestrial carbon uptake compared to simulations without an explicit nitrogen cycle. Our results show a significant growth in the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions over the coming century, attributable in part to a steady decline in the ocean sink fraction.

Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results fr
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 11:17 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Light skinned with no Negro dialect." (set 27 days ago)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona's 86th Congressional District
7,336 posts, read 1,942,273 times
Reputation: 1224
momonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud ofmomonkey has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
What is wrong with you people?

Care to expand on that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 11:43 PM
100% Pure Carbon
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
3,202 posts, read 1,345,275 times
Reputation: 1066
thecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud ofthecoalman has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
From 1953 through 1979 average US temperature dropped 0.40 Deg F per decade leading climatologist of the 1970s to warn of an impending Ice Age.
I was youngin then but can remember so please forgive me being skeptical about the current trends. Here's TIME article, you can replace cooling with warming and it would read like it was written today:


Quote:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...944914,00.html
Another Ice Age?


Monday, Jun. 24, 1974

Telltale signs are everywhere —from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest.Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F. Although that figure is at best an estimate, it is supported by other convincing data. When Climatologist George J. Kukla of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and his wife Helena analyzed satellite weather data for the Northern Hemisphere, they found that the area of the ice and snow cover had suddenly increased by 12% in 1971 and the increase has persisted ever since. Areas of Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, for example, were once totally free of any snow in summer; now they are covered year round.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2009, 11:46 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Say NO to censorship!" (set 8 days ago)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central Illinois -
4,655 posts, read 1,414,436 times
Reputation: 1313
odanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud ofodanny has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Care to expand on that?

Yes, science has determined that the earth is getting warmer but I dont need scientists to tell me, I only need to use half my brain to determine this for myself.

There is a church of denial and I believe its all made possible by two things to those who deny the obvious, and they are:

1) A right wing echo chamber of disinformation on the internet, television and other corporate misinformers

2) Dumb people who believe the disinformation. I usually find the reason for that is they take a scientific issue and turn it into a political one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2009, 01:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mississauga
1,575 posts, read 412,911 times
Reputation: 268
mississauga75 is a jewel in the roughmississauga75 is a jewel in the roughmississauga75 is a jewel in the roughmississauga75 is a jewel in the roughmississauga75 is a jewel in the roughmississauga75 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
As long as the sun is sleeping, the world will keep being below normal, temperature wise.

http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/...spots_1024.jpg
I've read the more scientists learn about solar cycles the more links they see between global warming and natural cycles. Some people though, will forever be convinced that man-made warming constitutes the bulk of climate change.

NASA: Solar cycle may cause “dangerous” global cooling in a few years time « Aftermath News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top