U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-26-2009, 04:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Great State of Texas
12,381 posts, read 4,791,799 times
Reputation: 2543
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metlakatla View Post
In a nationally televised event at the White House, Obama said families need better information so they don't unthinkingly approve "additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care."
I'm learning that what is said in speeches and on TV is not necessarily the same as what is put on paper and approved as law.

Cap & Trade is one of them which is currently being debated.
Obama never once mentioned the sheer amount of additional NEW taxes and fees this will require in his speeches but it sure is right there in black and white in the bill currently on the House floor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hangin' with the bears.
3,734 posts, read 1,199,531 times
Reputation: 849
Siouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to beholdSiouxcia is a splendid one to behold
MedlinePlus: Advance Directives

Quote:
Advance directives are legal documents that allow you to convey your decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time. They provide a way for you to communicate your wishes to family, friends and health care professionals, and to avoid confusion later on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Great State of Texas
12,381 posts, read 4,791,799 times
Reputation: 2543
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siouxcia View Post
But isn't that for "I don't want any more to prolong life" type of documents ?

What if it goes the other way though..doctors deciding that you don't need that treatment based on your current health and studies on whether or not the next procedure is considered "needless" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
8,128 posts, read 3,871,516 times
Reputation: 1411
Miborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud ofMiborn has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm learning that what is said in speeches and on TV is not necessarily the same as what is put on paper and approved as law.

Cap & Trade is one of them which is currently being debated.
Obama never once mentioned the sheer amount of additional NEW taxes and fees this will require in his speeches but it sure is right there in black and white in the bill currently on the House floor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:15 PM
May Satan rock you all!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY
8,397 posts, read 3,838,914 times
Reputation: 1659
newtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant futurenewtoli has a brilliant future
Main Entry:
fu·tile Listen to the pronunciation of futile Listen to the pronunciation of futile
Pronunciation:
\ˈfyü-təl, ˈfyü-ˌtī(-ə)l\
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin futilis brittle, pointless, probably from fu- (akin to fundere to pour) — more at found
Date:
circa 1555

1 : serving no useful purpose : completely ineffective <efforts to convince him were futile>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
3,979 posts, read 702,600 times
Reputation: 802
Wapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
WOW JUST WOW!




At a healthcare town hall, he says stopping futile procedures for the terminally ill can lower costs.
By Peter Nicholas
June 25, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- President Obama suggested at a town hall event Wednesday night that one way to shave medical costs is to stop expensive and ultimately futile procedures performed on people who are about to die and don't stand to gain from the extra care.

In a nationally televised event at the White House, Obama said families need better information so they don't unthinkingly approve "additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care."


Obama discusses deathbed measures - Los Angeles Times
Or wasting taxpayer money on expensive medical treatments for 100 year old women?

Quote:
Jane Sturm told the story of her nearly 100-year-old mother, who was originally denied a pacemaker because of her age. She eventually got one, but only after seeking out another doctor.

"Outside the medical criteria," Sturm asked, "is there a consideration that can be given for a certain spirit ... and quality of life?"

"I don't think that we can make judgments based on peoples' spirit," Obama said. "That would be a pretty subjective decision to be making. I think we have to have rules that say that we are going to provide good, quality care for all people.

Hot Air » Blog Archive » ObamaCare infomercial: What were they thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
12,297 posts, read 6,844,927 times
Reputation: 2593
KevK has a reputation beyond repute
KevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
WOW JUST WOW!




At a healthcare town hall, he says stopping futile procedures for the terminally ill can lower costs.
By Peter Nicholas
June 25, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- President Obama suggested at a town hall event Wednesday night that one way to shave medical costs is to stop expensive and ultimately futile procedures performed on people who are about to die and don't stand to gain from the extra care.

In a nationally televised event at the White House, Obama said families need better information so they don't unthinkingly approve "additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care."


Obama discusses deathbed measures - Los Angeles Times
I FULLY 100% agree. ALL treatments should be weighed with cost, side effects and prognosis considered. People who are death's doorstep should be made comfortable but all life prolonging treatments should cease when the doctors agree that it is futile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
12,297 posts, read 6,844,927 times
Reputation: 2593
KevK has a reputation beyond repute
KevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
What words other than WOW JUST WOW are mine?
Take the blinders off and read the "one's" own words. What we have been warning and what has been said before.
The obama administration wants to pick and choose who receives what care, when and for how long.
It is NOT the Govs place to choose someones medical care it is up to the families involved.

But what do you expect from a administration that says the
"old should just die gracefully"
It should not be left up to families. It should be left up to Medical professionals as to when it is time to pull the plug. The family can have input into that if they wish but it should not be their decision in the end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
3,979 posts, read 702,600 times
Reputation: 802
Wapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm learning that what is said in speeches and on TV is not necessarily the same as what is put on paper and approved as law.

Cap & Trade is one of them which is currently being debated.
Obama never once mentioned the sheer amount of additional NEW taxes and fees this will require in his speeches but it sure is right there in black and white in the bill currently on the House floor.
0bama was pretty stright up on skyrocketing electricity costs for his cap & trade plan:

Quote:
During Obama's January 2008 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle:

"You know, when I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, uh, you know - Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, you know, natural gas, you name it — whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, uh, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers."

[snip]
So, if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can - it’s just that it will bankrupt them, because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.
then again, on June 23rd, just three days ago 0bama said:

"At a time of great fiscal challenges, this legislation is paid for by the polluters who currently emit the dangerous carbon emissions that contaminate the water we drink and pollute the air we breathe."

Hmmm, he said last year, when describing what the coal power plants would do: "They will pass that money on to consumers."

Last edited by Wapasha; 06-26-2009 at 05:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
904 posts, read 179,755 times
Reputation: 294
cdne is a jewel in the roughcdne is a jewel in the roughcdne is a jewel in the roughcdne is a jewel in the roughcdne is a jewel in the roughcdne is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
I know how to read, thanks. I'm just not sure some others know how.
Moderator cut: RUDE The article is quite straightforward, and the OP did not take anything out of context.

Basically Obama said that giving one a painkiller and letting them die is the best procedure in some cases. The question remains, "who will determine when that is the best",....the doctors, or the government.

You seem to have all the answers, yet the bill has not even been authored yet. Obama is leaving the writing of the obamacare boondoggle to his liberal cronies.

Last edited by katzenfreund; 06-26-2009 at 10:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top