U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-27-2009, 12:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Miami, FL
1,757 posts, read 273,777 times
Reputation: 305
Finn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
What rules are you referring to?
UN Rules obviously. The UN sanction/resolution we are supposedly trying to enforce, in fact DID NOT authorize the use of any kind of force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2009, 12:41 PM
1/20/09 Destruction of US - Proceeding as planned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland
18,217 posts, read 5,200,896 times
Reputation: 2301
sanrene has a reputation beyond repute
sanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond repute
As usual, the UN has no teeth.

The resolution authorized interdiction of ships - on a strictly voluntary basis.

If we ask NK to take a peek at their cargo, would they give permission? Of course not.

Such a resolution is meaningless and shows just how useless the UN truly is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2009, 12:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Miami, FL
1,757 posts, read 273,777 times
Reputation: 305
Finn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the roughFinn_Jarber is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
As usual, the UN has no teeth.

The resolution authorized interdiction of ships - on a strictly voluntary basis.

If we ask NK to take a peek at their cargo, would they give permission? Of course not.

Such a resolution is meaningless and shows just how useless the UN truly is.
Yes, but apparently US is trying to get that changed, so in the future they can to forcible inspections.

Just wait until we sign the LOST treaty, and then our hands will be tied even if there was a ship WE KNEW was carrying nukes and was coming straight for NYC. Bush was pushing for the LOST treaty, and unfortunately Obama seems to be in favor of it too. It must be opposed at all costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2009, 01:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the Ohio River in Western, KY
905 posts, read 320,340 times
Reputation: 529
Cav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of lightCav Scout wife is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
What was the sense of pushing for a UN mandate of interdiction, sending out a destroyer, shadowing the NK vessel for days and then ......... once your bluff is called, turning tail?

Do you not understand how impotent, weak and just plain stupid this was?
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Basically it was a who blinks situation that he should have know he was getting himslef into. He bascially blinked then. JFK was able to cut a deal where it looked like the russians blinked at least;only later did we find out about the deal.Its a dangerous game to play unless your dead serious.

Exactly! You do not get into a game of crazy eyes with dudes like Ill, unless you are ready to back your s**t up.

Basically Obama wussed out and self pwned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2009, 01:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
11,285 posts, read 5,710,935 times
Reputation: 2265
KevK has a reputation beyond repute
KevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond reputeKevK has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Come on..the US knows exactly what's on that ship..we don't have spy satellites for nothing you know.
That is exactly true. We know every item on the ship and how many crew are on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2009, 05:07 PM
Falls Angel
Status: "Snow!" (set 9 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Intermountain West
22,885 posts, read 12,677,697 times
Reputation: 3545
Katiana has a reputation beyond repute
Katiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond reputeKatiana has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
That is exactly true. We know every item on the ship and how many crew are on it.
Just like we KNEW about the WMD in Iraq!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2009, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Waiting for the aurora." (set 10 days ago)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fairbanks
2,396 posts, read 1,004,010 times
Reputation: 390
aurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really niceaurorawatcher is just really nice
The UN the most corrupt orginization there is. And did you expect the US to really do anything with this current administration in power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
2,674 posts, read 405,668 times
Reputation: 553
Wapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to allWapasha is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cav Scout wife View Post
Exactly! You do not get into a game of crazy eyes with dudes like Ill, unless you are ready to back your s**t up.

Basically Obama wussed out and self pwned.
This reminds of 0bama's assertion back in January of this year, where he stated: "We are going to ban all earmarks, the process by which individual members insert pet projects without review." 0bama folded like a cheap deck of cards on that one too.

You'd think, that with two years in the senate, he would have learned as much as any of us already knew, that banning earmarks takes more then tough words, and stern looks, to pull off. And yet, in the end, that's all there is to 0bama, tough, but empty, hollow rhetoric, just like his demand for a UN resolution to inspect NoK ships.

The dangerous aspect to all this, is if 0bama thinks he is being viewed as a gutless wuss, will he do something arrogant and rash, just to prove he can be a tough guy; maybe shoot a few more teenage pirates, to make it appear that he does posses gravitas? I'm being facetious of course, but a wounded, or cornered animal can be unpredictable and dangerous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
1,404 posts, read 201,522 times
Reputation: 164
wjtwet has a spectacular aura aboutwjtwet has a spectacular aura aboutwjtwet has a spectacular aura aboutwjtwet has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
US will not use force to inspect NKorean ship - Yahoo! News

Well, well, well.

So all that was needed from the little pot-bellied dictator was a few threats of war and annihilation?



What was that obama said about getting the international community together on this?

Hot Air » Blog Archive » US won’t use force to inspect NoKo ship





Yeah, so much for his "smart power".
we will probably apologize and send them food and money
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:29 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
3,563 posts, read 942,748 times
Reputation: 1308
CharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud ofCharlottePirateFan has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Kinda feel sorry for people who have to live in a world where people aren't considered brave unless they're violent....says a lot about their home life.....

So does lying, as you know.

But back to the point...who said anything about being violent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top