Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...I think history will show that, if nothing else, his determination to bring the issue of religious extremism and the danger it poses to a civilized world to the forefront will be his legacy.
I do agree with you here, the world certainly learned some lessons about the dangers of religious extremism thanks to Bush.
I do agree with you here, the world certainly learned some lessons about the dangers of religious extremism thanks to Bush.
A look back at your recent posts in other threads shows your post pattern seems to go something like this:
POST A: I am very intellectual and giving my opinion. I mean no harm.
--insert dissenting opinion from another poster here--
POST B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I: I won't debate this point with you. Instead, I will personally attack you and not even defend my position on the issues. I will call you a name or two and then try to get this thread up to 25 posts with a back-and-forth between two members with only name calling and no serious debate on the topic at hand. I will insert, "unlike you" at the beginning of most of my posts to imply I am waaaaay better, and will end many of them with rhetorical questions like "are you really that stupid?" that serve no purpose but to clog up the board and dumb-down the debate.
(I'm done. Posting something else not relating to the OP's topic only serves to make my point. Let's see if you can stand me having the last word...somehow, I doubt it. Unlike you, I will refrain, or are you really stupid enough to post again?)
so far the only accomplishment in this thread is that bush identified religious zealots in the middle east are dangerous? hmmmmm in 8 years this is all we can come up with?
A look back at your recent posts in other threads shows your post pattern seems to go something like this:
POST A: I am very intellectual and giving my opinion. I mean no harm.
--insert dissenting opinion from another poster here--
POST B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I: I won't debate this point with you. Instead, I will personally attack you and not even defend my position on the issues. I will call you a name or two and then try to get this thread up to 25 posts with a back-and-forth between two members with only name calling and no serious debate on the topic at hand. I will insert, "unlike you" at the beginning of most of my posts to imply I am waaaaay better, and will end many of them with rhetorical questions like "are you really that stupid?" that serve no purpose but to clog up the board and dumb-down the debate.
(I'm done. Posting something else not relating to the OP's topic only serves to make my point. Let's see if you can stand me having the last word...somehow, I doubt it. Unlike you, I will refrain, or are you really stupid enough to post again?)
Aww, I'm sorry.
I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.
You make silly predictions, yet you want to be taken seriously, right?
That is what you are saying?
so far the only accomplishment in this thread is that bush identified religious zealots in the middle east are dangerous? hmmmmm in 8 years this is all we can come up with?
No, I think what we've identified is that most people's seething hatred and robotic-like attack reflex on Bush will never allow the OP's question to be honestly answered without having to wade through 40 pages of unoriginal, not-clever, horribly un-sarcastic, one-liners before he gets to the information he wanted.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.