Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-29-2009, 12:07 PM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,330 times
Reputation: 3386

Advertisements

[quote=bigskydude;9521584]
Catering to the race "IS" racism ... as Affirmative action has shown us, time and time again.

quote]

I think there was a time in our history when affirmative action made a lot of sense. There is no question that it was nearly impossible for certain minorities to "get a seat at the table" before affirmative action was implemented.

That being said, I think our society has come a long way from those times, as evidenced by the fact that we have minorities in high level positions in almost every organization. So it might be time to start scaling back and in some cases eliminating affirmative action in some cases. A good example is giving preference for gender to female applicants to law schools. There are currently more female law students than male law students, so it's kind of silly to keep this policy in place. There are several examples like this that are out there.

But in those instances where minorities, or females are dramatically underrepresented, I think affirmative action still makes sense. The idea is to create more diversity, which innevitably improves the organizations where it happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2009, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Rockland County New York
2,984 posts, read 5,856,683 times
Reputation: 1298
This decision is another reason why Sotomayor should not be a Supreme Court judge. Justice is supposed to be blind, not favor one race over another. She obviously does not like whites, especially white men. She will always be known as a left racist judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 12:53 PM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,593,793 times
Reputation: 1080
Nice to know that once in a while justice prevails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,591,550 times
Reputation: 22044
Post News, Supreme Court rules for white firefighters.

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.

Supreme Court rules for white firefighters - White House- msnbc.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:30 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stac2007 View Post
This decision is another reason why Sotomayor should not be a Supreme Court judge. Justice is supposed to be blind, not favor one race over another. She obviously does not like whites, especially white men. She will always be known as a left racist judge.

how did she favor one race over another in this case?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Helena, Montana
2,010 posts, read 2,371,655 times
Reputation: 783
Right on. It's about time that it's shown that discrimination and racism works both ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:54 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,305,617 times
Reputation: 4894
It is about time we start seeing this.

You wont see this being covered at all by MSM.

Just shows Obama made yet another wrong decision.

My Dad got screwed over by affirmative action like this and he will be happy to know that someone finally seen just how wrong it was.

See ya Sotomayer, you just became toast with your racist decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:59 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
It is about time we start seeing this.

You wont see this being covered at all by MSM.

Just shows Obama made yet another wrong decision.

My Dad got screwed over by affirmative action like this and he will be happy to know that someone finally seen just how wrong it was.

See ya Sotomayer, you just became toast with your racist decisions.
First of all, all the major news outlets are reporting on this SCOTUS decision.

Secondly, Sotomayor will be confirmed.

Thirdly, this wasn't a racist decision by Sotomayor that was overturned on review.

So that's three strikes...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Missouri
3,645 posts, read 4,926,082 times
Reputation: 768
This is wonderful news. All afirmative action needs to be stopped no matter what for or where. I am considered a minority and the one thing that happens is that people automatically think one got something or somewhere because of affirmative action. Hell, people think that Obama is the first affirmative action President and Sotomeyer can be looked at that way, as Thomas and many others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 02:05 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous Political Junky View Post
This is wonderful news. All afirmative action needs to be stopped no matter what for or where. I am considered a minority and the one thing that happens is that people automatically think one got something or somewhere because of affirmative action. Hell, people think that Obama is the first affirmative action President and Sotomeyer can be looked at that way, as Thomas and many others.
This weakens Title VII, but it does not do away with it. Effectively, this is an anti-employer ruling. Title VII, particularly after the updates in the 1990's, placed the burden on employers to prove that their policies and methods for qualifying potential employees were not racially biased. This ruling places the additional burden on employers when they do deem a policy or test racially biased, that they prove it is racially biased. In the past, racial bias was considered proven by the racial disparity on test results. The court has now said that is not enough. So the employer is now doubly burdened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top