Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Go to that thread and discuss moore this thread is about Palin and ethics
Actually, I'm going fishing. And since Shannyn Moore is one of those that you're blaring that your heroine is going to sue, discussion of her in this thread is entirely appropriate.
By the way, stop trying to silence the truth by bleating at me to go to a different thread. She has no case against Shannyn Moore. None.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by djm666
But perhaps the explanation for this lies in the final part of one of Palin's statements: that "Washington and the media" cannot understand her decision because "it's about country." In other words, for the past nine months, Palin has avoided difficult questions, preferring Runner's World to another Katie Couric interview; she has dragged her family into the spotlight when it suited her (baby Trig was in Runner's World, too) and grown angry when the spotlight became too strong; she has eschewed reason and logic (not to mention spelling and grammar), yet reacted in horror when her critics were unreasonable and illogical in response. Then, after all that, she smugly asserts the right to decide who is a patriot and who is not. It's not about "country," in other words, it's about hypocrisy. And Sarah Palin is full of it.washingtonpost.com
I guess I do, if you, like the rest of the Republican Party, can't come up with something original; the analyst is saying he hopes that someone new will ride over the horizon on a white horse and bring change, because they've sure got nothing now.
The very first question that any presidential candidate asks him or herself is not "Can I win?". Or "Am I a candidate that the people will embrace enough to get 51% of the vote?".
The very first question a presidential candidate asks before throwing his hat into the ring is "Can the current president be beaten?".
The Democrats need to concern themselves much more with how Obama does than to who the Republicans raise up as a challenger in '12.
P.S. I realize that this is a forum for these types of discussions but I am shocked at how hazy the crystal balls are of some of the people here and of much of the main stream media.
The very first question that any presidential candidate asks him or herself is not "Can I win?". Or "Am I a candidate that the people will embrace enough to get 51% of the vote?".
The very first question a presidential candidate asks before throwing his hat into the ring is "Can the current president be beaten?".
The Democrats need to concern themselves much more with how Obama does than to who the Republicans raise up as a challenger in '12.
P.S. I realize that this is a forum for these types of discussions but I am shocked at how hazy the crystal balls are of some of the people here and of much of the main stream media.
? Are you talking to me, or to the political analyst I quoted?
The woman is an idiot -- she rode the populist train as long as she could. I think she will be genuinly surprised that her career is in fact over. She is delusional.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
