Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,744,174 times
Reputation: 3146

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Bless his little heart!
Just paid a $70 copay for 5 pills yesterday.
Gotta love that government covered care.

Mmmmm how much do you think your Viagra would have cost without it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,170 posts, read 26,177,249 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Mmmmm how much do you think your Viagra would have cost without it?
Oh, a comedian.
Is it being prescribed for women now??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,744,174 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Oh, a comedian.
Is it being prescribed for women now??

As a matter of fact.....

Viagra And Women / Science News

OK how much do you think your Fosamax would cost without it? You also may want to look into a different Part D plan whic may cover what you are on. Go to Medicare.gov, they have an excellent tool for deciding which plan is best for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,170 posts, read 26,177,249 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
As a matter of fact.....

Viagra And Women / Science News

OK how much do you think your Fosamax would cost without it? You also may want to look into a different Part D plan whic may cover what you are on. Go to Medicare.gov, they have an excellent tool for deciding which plan is best for you.
Thanks for the suggestion.
What do you think we have spent hours doing every December?
One can look up what one is already taking
It would be pretty difficult to anticipate the need for a particular antibiotic, as in this instance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:34 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,140,689 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Mmmm 2009, the same year as the Democrats. And keep in mind the Dems controlled the Congress for the last 2 years and could have proposed legislation prior to this year as well. Keep in mind the last major change to health care occured under Bush, Medicare part D.
Yes, and Bush was president(sort of) for eight years ...Medicare isn't UHC.

The Democrats may have controlled Congress but with a pres who would veto anything they proposed.

The FACT is, the Republicans had eight years and didn't do anything to control health care costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,170 posts, read 26,177,249 times
Reputation: 27914
You realize, shorebaby, we're mostly on the same side of this issue.
I am pointing out that a government run program might not be as cheap as many seem to think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,744,174 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Thanks for the suggestion.
What do you think we have spent hours doing every December?
One can look up what one is already taking
It would be pretty difficult to anticipate the need for a particular antibiotic, as in this instance
I am sure there is a cheaper alternative in the therapeutic category your physician selected (It is mandated that 2 choices from each therapeutic category be covered). Plus the $70 you paid is less tha it owuld have cost without PArt D. Everybody wants something for nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,170 posts, read 26,177,249 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
I am sure there is a cheaper alternative in the therapeutic category your physician selected (It is mandated that 2 choices from each therapeutic category be covered). Plus the $70 you paid is less tha it owuld have cost without PArt D. Everybody wants something for nothing.

You may 'be sure' but the medicine prescribed is the best in this instance as well as a continuation of in hospital IV treatment.

Now under all the various Parts of Medicare....A,B and D and with a supplement, we have been paying approx $11,000 a year out of pocket.....not exactly getting something for nothing, would you say?
And yes, I do a thorough job picking out the lowest cost plans that are best for us.
I am willing to pay but am under no delusions that government coverage is FREE or even cheap as so many are counting on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,744,174 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Yes, and Bush was president(sort of) for eight years ...Medicare isn't UHC.

The Democrats may have controlled Congress but with a pres who would veto anything they proposed.

The FACT is, the Republicans had eight years and didn't do anything to control health care costs.

Neither did the Dems, go ahead pass a UHC dare the President to veto it. They did it for other bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,744,174 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
You may 'be sure' but the medicine prescribed is the best in this instance as well as a continuation of in hospital IV treatment.

Now under all the various Parts of Medicare....A,B and D and with a supplement, we have been paying approx $11,000 a year out of pocket.....not exactly getting something for nothing, would you say?
And yes, I do a thorough job picking out the lowest cost plans that are best for us.
I am willing to pay but am under no delusions that government coverage is FREE or even cheap as so many are counting on
Just because you were on a drug say Cipro in the hospital you don't have to continue on the same drug when discharged. Did anyone find out if there was a cheaper alternative?

The $11,000 you paid was a fraction of the actual cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top