Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,358,815 times
Reputation: 73932

Advertisements

Wouldn't transmit...but two more...

Private insurance represents 13% of health care spending in Canada—twice the OECD average

Demand for Private Health Insurance in Germany (http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/2/0/3/p92038_index.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:21 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Do you just make stuff up?

Docs I know in UHC countries are telling me about how private insurance/private clinics/private hospitals are actually making headways in their countries bc people are tired of waiting and the care they are getting.

The Determinants of Private Medical Insurance Prevalence in England, 1997–2000
Well then I guess the Republicans are lying about UHC putting those "poor" little "Profit" Care Insurance companies out of business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,279,876 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl View Post
It's funny ... bentle claims to be all about conservative ideals ... isn't one of the conservative bedrocks, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY??? oy!!!

Lets also mention, in fairness, that Germany has compusary service to their country as well ... do they still? A good friend of mine registered as a contientious objector, so he worked in a hospital for his service to his country. Again, I'd think that these country firsters would be all over that as well ... yes? no????

Also, in fairness, Germany is a lot less populated than the US. I'm not sure how feasible it would be to completely adopt a German system for heathcare, but I'd sure be hip to adopting some parts of it. Spas ... goooooood!!!!

And Theo Van Gogh was killed by a radical muslim etremist ... wow, extreme much????

And yes, pickpocketing is a risk and Chiel is right ... a little common sense goes a long long long way when travelling outside the US ... doi doi doi.
In Germany, military service is still compulsory, now it's 9 months where it used to be a year. If you have personal/religious beliefs that prohibit you from using a weapon, you can serve with a civil service type organization or the red cross, hospital, etc., for a period of about 1.5 times what a military stint would be.

A coworker broke his back and has been off for about 4 months. He's slowly coming back to work a few hours a day until he can work full time. His insurance pays his salary while he's off and while he's working his way back to full time.

Do some people abuse it, sure.
What system is not abused by some people?
It just shows their lack of integrity.
But that's in every country, company, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:26 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
The people with health care don't give a flying fig about anyone without adequate health cover.
It's a bit like the people who own a yacht and go from one place to the other, sunning themselves on deck, sipping their martinis looking down on the rest of the people rowing their hearts out in a dinghy, getting nowhere, and the yacht owners telling everyone how fortunate the dinghy owners are, to even have a boat.
America will NEVER catch up with other Industrialised Nations as far as health is concerned until it gets out from under the jackboot of the big Corporations and insurance companies that are so self interest that they are destroying America.
All i hear is "Nanny State" or "Socialism" or "Biggggg Govt." Hey you want to be "Suckered" in by the CEO's etc then be my guest, but don't start sobbing when the next economic meltdown happens and you lose everything because of Corporation Greed. "Big" Govt spending will pail into insignificance compared to the Company Corruption that is yet to come once America rejects a UHC and gives the "Fat Cats" permission to rape America.

america is the world leader in health care! american technology has come up with the newest drugs, the best diagnostic equipment, the best procedures, etc.

what we have is a plan whereby president obama called on health industry leaders to cut the rate of growth in national health care spending by 1.5 percentage points each year. Curbing medical spending will force cuts in hospital budgets, spread nurses even thinner, and reduce the number of diagnostic machines available, causing waits for treatment. Slowing the flow of dollars into healthcare will also depress the largest growth industry in the U.S. (17 percent of GDP) and cause layoffs. Healthcare currently employs 14 million people, more than ten times the U.S. workforce at General Motors and Chrysler.


why would our president want to slow down the largest growth engine that the united states has currently, especially in light of rising unemployment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,728,382 times
Reputation: 8253
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
america is the world leader in health care! american technology has come up with the newest drugs, the best diagnostic equipment, the best procedures, etc.

what we have is a plan whereby president obama called on health industry leaders to cut the rate of growth in national health care spending by 1.5 percentage points each year. Curbing medical spending will force cuts in hospital budgets, spread nurses even thinner, and reduce the number of diagnostic machines available, causing waits for treatment. Slowing the flow of dollars into healthcare will also depress the largest growth industry in the U.S. (17 percent of GDP) and cause layoffs. Healthcare currently employs 14 million people, more than ten times the U.S. workforce at General Motors and Chrysler.


why would our president want to slow down the largest growth engine that the united states has currently, especially in light of rising unemployment?
Which is why I fully support medical administrative cost reform ... that's the 10,000 pound gorilla in the healthcare world ... but nobody will even touch it ... going after so called rich doctors and quality nurses is the easy thing to do. What needs to be reformed is the invisible layers between the doctors and the patients.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,279,876 times
Reputation: 11416
The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems
PR-2000-43/ WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION : ASSESSES THE WORLD'S HEALTH SYSTEMS

or you can sift through the WHO report itself: WHO | World Health Organization Assesses the World's Health Systems

Hey, we're no. 37.

I'd use the US health care for acute items, but day to day, no thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,358,815 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl View Post
Which is why I fully support medical administrative cost reform ... that's the 10,000 pound gorilla in the healthcare world ... but nobody will even touch it ... going after so called rich doctors and quality nurses is the easy thing to do. What needs to be reformed is the invisible layers between the doctors and the patients.

This is hitting the nail on the head.
No one is saying we don't need some reform to make for better accessibility.

Going to an inefficient, ridiculous single-payor system (where the payor will suck up tax dollars and hand out cruddy care if the current govt health plans are any example - VA/medicaid/medicare - and people who are getting great health care now will either have to pay two premiums or get crappy care along with everyone) is not the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 08:12 AM
 
Location: London, U.K.
3,006 posts, read 3,870,546 times
Reputation: 1750
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Do you just make stuff up?

Docs I know in UHC countries are telling me about how private insurance/private clinics/private hospitals are actually making headways in their countries bc people are tired of waiting and the care they are getting.

The Determinants of Private Medical Insurance Prevalence in England, 1997–2000
1997-2000! This report is from 9 years ago! The NHS was on its knees from chronic underfunding by the previous conservative goverment at the time!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 08:28 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,845,775 times
Reputation: 2059
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Do you just make stuff up?

Docs I know in UHC countries are telling me about how private insurance/private clinics/private hospitals are actually making headways in their countries bc people are tired of waiting and the care they are getting.

The Determinants of Private Medical Insurance Prevalence in England, 1997–2000
Having used a UHC all my life. Having family in UHC countries outside of the UK. Having Studied medicine in the UK and have many Doctor Friends, i can tell you FIRST HAND and not from "Hearsay" from friends that the Private sector will always survive in any UHC Country. The only difference is that with a UHC the cost of private health care plummets so low that anyone who wants private health care can afford both a UHC and private for less than Americans are now paying for just Private. Maybe that is why more people are now getting private health in UHC, because they can easily afford both?
The Conservatives cannot have it both ways. In one breath a UHC will destroy the Private health sector and then in another breath how the private health sector is more popular in UHC countries.
Which one is it???????

Last edited by geeoro; 07-20-2009 at 09:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,358,815 times
Reputation: 73932
Do those same docs tell you how they wish they could practice here? Cuz that's what they tell me. They want our resources, our technology, and what pays for that...? Not government-scale reimbursement.
Single payor will cost too much and not be worth it...the best thing that happened to medicare drug programs was turning to a private company for modeling.
I don't want to live in a system where there is rationing and delays that may decrease overall mortality (barely) with a concommitant surge in morbidity.
And why does it cost 900 bucks to be seen privately in Canada? That doesn't sound like a lower price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top