Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Atlanta,GA
2,685 posts, read 6,423,187 times
Reputation: 1232

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
Now that's an interesting posit. I actually remember those days when the U.S. had a real economy. It was the same days that corporations hired Americans, manufactured and traded here first and had a social conscience. They cared for and about their employees, payed their executives nicely but not overly extravagantly and provided reasonable returns to their stockholders. In other words, they were responsible as opposed to merely greedy. That's why people stuck with an employer for an entire cxareer and were rewarded with pensions and benefits.

Now, all too many people seem to want instant gratification in the form of outlandish wages and younger people have an entitlement attitude that makes them think they should be running things after two or three years.

Lastly, instead of breaking the power of corporations, of late there seems to be more of a trend to taking them over. I don't see that as a good thing.

Just a few observations from a recently retired old fart.
Great analysis. Finally someone who understands how things should work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's not government that needs to change their feelings, it's the banks and big corporations. The emerging countries have money to spend and have a growing consumer base that is not in debt over their heads. Company expansions are going on there; jobs are being created and/or offshored to these emerging countries that have surplus budgets and money to spend.

Banks and corporations call the shots and it's not for America right now.
I spoke too soon. Here is another person that understands what is going on, and gets it. That makes two.

See......I can count . Great posts to the both of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
what does wal mart produce? bargains. you know what's ironic? democrats like you complaining about sending jobs overseas, yet wanting to grant amnesty for the overseas coming into the country illegally, and driving down wages.

and that, my friend, is thefinalsay
Walmart does NOT produce anything. They are not a "producer" of goods.

Most of our jobs today do not produce anything if you think about it.
Consumer and service..neither of which are producers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Still looking for deflection?

OK...

Answer this:

What does Wal-Mart produce?

Still, regardless of your continuing deflection attempts, Republicans whining about the job losses they created is beyond ironic. It goes right along with their iron-clad commitment to "family values".
Nothing they are a retailer. What does a GM car dealership produce. What does Whole foods produce? What does BEst Buy produce?

Wal Mart provides products people want at a low price. What's wrong with that?

Ah was Clinton a Republican?

President Clinton Signing NAFTA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterNY View Post
Great analysis. Finally someone who understands how things should work.



I spoke too soon. Here is another person that understands what is going on, and gets it. That makes two.

See......I can count . Great posts to the both of you.
MisterNY..I'm a programmer. Jobs have been leaving for China/India since 2000. We (minority in the software industry) knew the "global economy" was not good for America. Manufacturers before us knew that too. But the majority were too happy with their "low prices" and fat stock dividends.

So here we are now scraping the bottom of the barrel. Consumer economies don't survive. Producer economies survive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
It was the same days that corporations hired Americans, manufactured and traded here first and had a social conscience.
Nafta - Clinton's baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:15 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,123,156 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
what does wal mart produce? bargains. you know what's ironic? democrats like you complaining about sending jobs overseas, yet wanting to grant amnesty for the overseas coming into the country illegally, and driving down wages.

and that, my friend, is thefinalsay
The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs

China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) was supposed to improve the U.S. trade deficit with China and create good jobs in the United States. But those promises have gone unfulfilled: the total U.S. trade deficit with China reached $235 billion in 2006. Between 2001 and 2006, this growing deficit eliminated 1.8 million U.S. jobs (Scott 2007). The world’s biggest retailer, U.S.-based Wal-Mart was responsible for $27 billion in U.S. imports from China in 2006 and 11% of the growth of the total U.S. trade deficit with China between 2001 and 2006. Wal-Mart’s trade deficit with China alone eliminated nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs in this period.

The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs

Walmart is about as un-American and unpatriotic a company as you will ever find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs

China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) was supposed to improve the U.S. trade deficit with China and create good jobs in the United States. But those promises have gone unfulfilled: the total U.S. trade deficit with China reached $235 billion in 2006. Between 2001 and 2006, this growing deficit eliminated 1.8 million U.S. jobs (Scott 2007). The world’s biggest retailer, U.S.-based Wal-Mart was responsible for $27 billion in U.S. imports from China in 2006 and 11% of the growth of the total U.S. trade deficit with China between 2001 and 2006. Wal-Mart’s trade deficit with China alone eliminated nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs in this period.

The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000

U.S. jobs

Walmart is about as un-American and unpatriotic a company as you will ever find.

About equal to the jobs they created.

Welcome Wal-Mart by Jonathan Hoenig -- Capitalism Magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2009, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
what does wal mart produce? bargains. you know what's ironic? democrats like you complaining about sending jobs overseas, yet wanting to grant amnesty for the overseas coming into the country illegally, and driving down wages.

and that, my friend, is thefinalsay

Consider this, fs...

If those illegal immigrants are given legal status, will their employers (who "invited" them over in the first place) be able to continue to exploit them as a pool of subminimum wage workers, or will they be compelled to pay them a legal wage w/ benefits?

Would improving their status somehow possibly also improve conditions for lower paid American workers who would then no longer be competing against slave-wage foreigners with no legal recourse?

Show me the irony...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top