Stimulus Bill Funds Go to Art Houses Showing 'Pervert' Revues, Underground Pornography (government, states)

[delusianne]

Originally Posted by cleanhouse

I thought liberals are not supposed to stereo type?

According to some stereotype.

[Jadex]

Originally Posted by delusianne

Well, color me impressed. Faux didnt hold off until the last line to admit this:

...most of the [stimulus] money is being spent to help preserve jobs in museums, orchestras, theaters and dance troupes that have been hit hard by the recession.

It's right up there in the second paragraph, above the fold!

What's the matter over there?

I know you are use to MSNBC that would leave that out but try and focus on the topic of the thread , The topic isnt Fox news

[Ceece]

Originally Posted by nvxplorer

Because some have different tastes in theater is why the stimulus shouldn't have been passed? That doesn't make a lick of sense, but you agree anyway?

I agree that the stimulus was a bad idea. I didn't say anything about theater.

However, I don't think the money was well spent in this case. Why? I don't consider pornography to be art.

[Jadex]

Originally Posted by delusianne

Try to understand it this way. The article admits that SF relies on its arts-related income for $1B every year.

San Francisco's economy is driven by the arts, which provided nearly 30,000 jobs in the city last year, according to Luis R. Cancel, director of cultural affairs for the San Francisco Arts Council.

"The city's non-profit arts and cultural sector generates $1.03 billion in local economic activity annually and, therefore, it will play a critical role in our recovery," Cancel said in a statement.

"With these stimulus funds San Francisco arts organizations will be able to weather the storm and continue to provide jobs and to generate revenue while enriching people's lives through innovative, high quality programming."

see now?

lol @ to you that porn is a form of art. Guess we could call an art dealer into the local adult book store and put the value on all those dvds

Focus

[delusianne]

Originally Posted by Jadex

I know you are use to MSNBC that would leave that out but try and focus on the topic of the thread , The topic isnt Fox news

? Have you never noticed the editorial style of Faux articles? This one, for whatever reason, was an exception to the rule, so I commented.

[delusianne]

Originally Posted by Jadex

lol @ to you that porn is a form of art. Guess we could call an art dealer into the local adult book store and put the value on all those dvds

Focus

Much to my surprise, you completely missed the point of the post, which is explained in its extended quote of your linked article (the part that's indented).

[nvxplorer]

Originally Posted by Ceece

I agree that the stimulus was a bad idea. I didn't say anything about theater.

You agreed with the statement you quoted, which used this case to oppose the stimulus.

However, I don't think the money was well spent in this case. Why? I don't consider pornography to be art.

That's your right, but thankfully, we don't govern ourselves according to one person's opinions.

[nvxplorer]

Originally Posted by Jadex

lol @ to you that porn is a form of art. Guess we could call an art dealer into the local adult book store and put the value on all those dvds

Focus

And to some people, Michelangelo's David is pornographic. Everyone doesn't have the same taste. Focus, indeed.

[delusianne]

Originally Posted by nvxplorer

And to some people, Michelangelo's David is pornographic. Everyone doesn't have the same taste. Focus, indeed.

The U.S. Justice Department spent $8000 for a drapery to cover a female statue with an exposed breast-Truth!

[dcsldcd]

For the left, porn is their art.