U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:02 PM
 
41 posts, read 47,505 times
Reputation: 16

Advertisements

Air Force Two & Nancy Pelosi!

Posted: Aug 5th, 2009


For the past few years Nancy Pelosi has been disgruntled over the fact that the Air Force won't provide her with from the East Coast back to the West Coast whenever she wants. It's too bad she can't have her very own personal Air Force Two. But, wait, maybe she can!
Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies. And then we saw them flying coach and traveling by fuel efficient cars.

Great photo-op!

Apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel : At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress. The Air Force had asked for one Gulfstream 550 jet (price tag: about $65 million) as part of an ongoing upgrade of its passenger air service.

I thought we were in a recession!

What happened to austerity and cutting back?
The House Appropriations Committee, at its own initiative, added to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill another $132 million for two more airplanes and specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials.

The Gulfstream G550 is a luxury private jet, which the company advertises as featuring long-range flight capacity that “easily links Washington, D.C., with Dubai, London with Singapore and Tokyo with Paris.” The company’s promotional materials say, “The cabin aboard the G550 combines productivity with exceptional comfort. It features up to four distinct living areas, three temperature zones, a choice of 12 floor plan configurations with seating for up to 18 passengers.”




The HYPOCRISY i guess you pinkos are spending the bailout money (200 Million could have been put to better the country IMO) to fly high in the sky instead of help the inner city poor public school systems help create jobs boost our ecomeny jobs yada yada this and that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,043 posts, read 11,594,754 times
Reputation: 1392
Glorious Comrade Commissars in DC Central Command should be able to enjoy money from devoted citizens of USSA!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Here
10,864 posts, read 11,932,049 times
Reputation: 5985
Wasn't Nancy and the crew scolding the auto exec's for using similar jets a few months ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,924 posts, read 28,206,370 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViewFromThePeak View Post
Glorious Comrade Commissars in DC Central Command should be able to enjoy money from devoted citizens of USSA!
Whether they should get to do that they certainly did think they should. I wonder what else that $200 million could have been spent on, like providing some jobs that Obama just can't seem to find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,689 posts, read 9,447,940 times
Reputation: 946
someone give her a prius and tell her to drive her butt from cali to washington.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Edwardsville, IL
1,815 posts, read 2,089,460 times
Reputation: 1472
I'm an Air Force veteran, and this absolutely digusts me. Make her and the rest of the anti-armed forces libs take charter buses. Its not like that they have to get to Washington in a hurry - nothing coherent, relevant or intelligent comes out of their mouths or tiny little brains anyway.

Here's a good idea - give Barbara Boxer a one-way ride in an Army Corps of Engineers convoy commanded by Brigadier General Michael Walsh!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 09:03 PM
 
41 posts, read 47,505 times
Reputation: 16

YouTube - Senator Barbara Boxer: "Don't Call Me Ma'am" - General Michael Walsh



lol Im surprised she didnt address "Dont call me Ma'am" with Harry Alford maybe she didnt want to look like a racist with Harry lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,087 posts, read 17,556,442 times
Reputation: 10299
As pathetic as that is, are there any links, beyond this one:

Air Force Two & Nancy Pelosi!

to corroborate the story?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 09:32 PM
 
41 posts, read 47,505 times
Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
As pathetic as that is, are there any links, beyond this one: to corroborate the story?
Air Force Two & Nancy Pelosi!

House Orders Up Three Elite Jets
August 5, 2009
By Paul Singer
Roll Call Staff


Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies.
But apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel: At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress.
The Air Force had asked for one Gulfstream 550 jet (price tag: about $65 million) as part of an ongoing upgrade of its passenger air service.
But the House Appropriations Committee, at its own initiative, added to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill another $132 million for two more airplanes and specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials.
Because the Appropriations Committee viewed the additional aircraft as an expansion of an existing Defense Department program, it did not treat the money for two more planes as an earmark, and the legislation does not disclose which Member had requested the additional money.
An Appropriations Committee staffer said the military was already planning to replace its passenger fleet, and the committee “looked at the request and decided they should speed up the replacement.”
The Gulfstream G550 is a luxury business jet, which the company advertises as featuring long-range flight capacity that “easily links Washington, D.C., with Dubai, London with Singapore and Tokyo with Paris.” The company’s promotional materials say, “The cabin aboard the G550 combines productivity with exceptional comfort. It features up to four distinct living areas, three temperature zones, a choice of 12 floor plan configurations with seating for up to 18 passengers.”
The version Gulfstream sells to the military is reconfigured for the government with modest accommodations, not the luxury version sold to private customers, said a source familiar with the planes.
Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.) had submitted a request to the Appropriations Committee for a $70 million earmark for one airplane on behalf of Georgia-based Gulfstream, and Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) lists the airplane as one of the earmarks that he was asked to request, though his office said he never made the request to the Appropriations Committee.
“The committee saw fit to fund it at that level” without Kingston’s involvement, his spokesman said.
Bishop’s office did not return several calls requesting comment for this story.
Air Force spokesman Vincent King told Roll Call: “This line item provides funding to purchase C-37 aircraft. The C-37 is the military variant of the commercial Gulfstream 550 executive jet. C-37s provide executive airlift for senior U.S. government officials including Congress and combatant commanders.”
The language of the appropriations bill specifies that of the three aircraft, the Air Force will provide “one aircraft each for the 201st Airlift Squadron and the 89th Airlift Wing.” Both are based out of Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland.
The 89th Airlift Wing provides “global Special Air Mission (SAM) airlift, logistics, aerial port and communications for the President, Vice President, Combat Commanders, senior leaders and the global mobility system,” according to the Andrews Web site.
King told Roll Call, “the 201st Airlift Squadron provides short-notice worldwide transportation for the executive branch, Congressional Members, Department of Defense officials and high-ranking U.S. and foreign dignitaries.”
An Armed Forces Press Service news story from 2004 said that the 201st counted “U.S. Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert [R-Ill.] and [then-Senate Armed Services Chairman] John Warner [R-Va.] among its frequent flyers.”
Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, said if Congress wants to buy new jets for the comfort of top government officials, “I think that all needs to be justified on the merits. ... Certainly, lawmakers can fly — and many do fly — coach and business class.” While there may be reasons for flying on top-notch private jets, “it shouldn’t just be squeezed into the bill.”
Ellis said the airplanes are also part of a larger trend for the Appropriations Committee to simply decide that big-ticket items are program increases, not earmarks, so they require less public disclosure.
“The more that you push for transparency, the more of this stuff goes underneath the carpet,” Ellis said. While Congress has established new rules requiring greater transparency for earmarks, the Appropriations Committee is “the judge, jury and executioner over what is an earmark and what isn’t and how much information we get.”
But military analysts said the private jets, despite the high price tag, may be worth the money because of the security and efficiency they provide to high-ranking public officials.
Loren Thompson, defense analyst at the conservative Lexington Institute, said, “In the case of the VIP transport for the executive branch, you can easily explain the cost [of private travel] in terms of the risk of somebody being taken hostage or having their time wasted when a critical decision is pending.”
Thompson pointed out that the cost of the plane would be peanuts compared to the cost to the nation if a top official were taken hostage or harmed taking a commercial flight to a dangerous region of the world.
But Thompson also said that logic “applies to the top members of the executive branch more than it applies to the Member from the 13th district of Illinois.”
John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a defense information Web site, said military officials “need a long-range airplane — and [it’s] better to fly them on a small one than a big one.” Pike said it is unreasonable to expect a three-star general and a staff of five people to attend meetings around the world with several stops in far-flung locales while traveling on commercial airlines.



RollCall.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2009, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,087 posts, read 17,556,442 times
Reputation: 10299
Definitely pathethic. I was hoping for coverage by other sources. Is that all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top