U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 08-11-2009, 03:47 PM
1/20/09 Destruction of US - Proceeding as planned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland
20,605 posts, read 6,614,359 times
Reputation: 2653
sanrene has a reputation beyond repute
sanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond reputesanrene has a reputation beyond repute
Default Correcting obama's misinformation on obamacare;

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Correcting misinformation about ObamaCare

Just for starters.

We need a website to debunk the WH's rhetoric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2009, 03:50 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Nostalgia, the past through fog tinted glasses!" (set 29 days ago)
 
Join Date: May 2008
8,566 posts, read 2,486,435 times
Reputation: 2337
ovcatto has a reputation beyond repute
ovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond reputeovcatto has a reputation beyond repute
The Mistress of Misinformation is going to expose misinformation?

I guess it takes a pro to catch a pro but in this case I find the likelihood highly suspect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 03:53 PM
Crankier than average
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Klamath, OR
1,844 posts, read 1,869,381 times
Reputation: 942
PNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to beholdPNW-type-gal is a splendid one to behold
There are an awful lot of "may," "might," "could," and "possibly" in that alleged debunking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NorCal
4,581 posts, read 1,099,333 times
Reputation: 2066
Ceece has a reputation beyond repute
Ceece has a reputation beyond reputeCeece has a reputation beyond reputeCeece has a reputation beyond reputeCeece has a reputation beyond reputeCeece has a reputation beyond reputeCeece has a reputation beyond repute
I agree that the WH needs to come out with a sharp message, and less ambiguity, about health care reform. Details, that's what people want. Hopefully that will happen soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
3,977 posts, read 700,258 times
Reputation: 801
Wapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to beholdWapasha is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Correcting misinformation about ObamaCare

Just for starters.

We need a website to debunk the WH's rhetoric.
The healthcare bill is not even written yet, so how can 0bama assert what it will cost, or what it will and will not do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:30 PM
Do Not Steal, the socialists hate competition
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here today, gone tomorrow
5,966 posts, read 3,002,563 times
Reputation: 1422
evilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post
There are an awful lot of "may," "might," "could," and "possibly" in that alleged debunking.
I wish that the President would be straightforward instead of being deceitful but we have only what he says... the funny thing is that he is promising something he didn't even write... company lobbyists probably wrote most of it... ironic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,570 posts, read 1,579,615 times
Reputation: 1525
subsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant futuresubsound has a brilliant future
All of these things have been pretty much been proven wrong weeks ago, and that they were propaganda by those who oppose it to force people to vote their way by lying.

The parts where it states the government is planning to fund programs to euthanize people are not real, it's been debunked more then a dozen times in the last week. There are no real numbers behind the cost estimates or explanations for their forecasting, just a cryptic statement on the link that says "We feel we have better data then the CBO"...where is the data? It states in here that 84 million people will loose their coverage instantly, and there is no reason why provided. Just an unknown study vaguely referenced that states the result, where are the numbers and the conclusions that make them think this way? The even better part is it states the scary government is going to take over health care and run it like Medicare/Medicaid...then at the end it states he wants to cut both of them...which is it?

If people want the truth provide the numbers, I checked their references provided in the article and all I can find is some vague statements from studies I cannot find. I already don't like the bill for my own reasons, but if they say they can quantify it and just state to trust them...it's like peeing on my leg to convince me it's raining. If you have numbers publish the study.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Great State of Texas
12,375 posts, read 4,784,975 times
Reputation: 2542
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
... to force people to vote their way by lying.
Who's vote ? We don't get to vote on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top