The
Not Right Versus The
Wrong Wing
The propaganda ministry has been successful in creating divisions that are meaningless or inaccurate. The biggest BIG LIE is the so-called battle between
left and right wing or
liberal and conservative.
Let's consider the wing with which people are associated with, when speaking of political partisanship.
LEFT WING - the section of a political party, government or group that holds the most left or radical views.
- - - Webster's Dictionary
RIGHT WING - the section of a political party, government or group that holding the views of the Right.
- - - Webster's Dictionary
THE RIGHT - that section of a political party ... which associates itself with traditional authority or opinion and which in legislative bodies is seated traditionally to the right of the presiding officer.
- - - Webster's Dictionary
THE LEFT - that section of a political party ... which differs most from traditional authority or opinion and which in legislative bodies is seated traditionally to the left of the presiding officer.
- - - Webster's Dictionary
Is that clear?
Left = opposition to traditional authority or opinion
Right = support of traditional authority or opinion
So what clue leads us to know what "traditional authority or opinion" is?
Amendment V, US Constitution 1789
... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
What is AGAINST traditional authority or opinion?
From the Communist manifesto:
"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Most Americans would be surprised to learn that private property rights were abolished by voluntary enrollment into national socialism (aka Socialist InSecurity). Since 1935, the U.S. government has been LEFTIST, whether Demopublican or Republicrat.
PRIVATE PROPERTY - "As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels."
- - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217
If the government takes your property for public use - and does not pay just compensation - then you have absolute proof that you do not own private property anymore.
In case you were curious, there is NO LAW that requires all Americans to participate in Socialist InSecurity, nor is there any law that punishes an American who does not participate. It is 100% voluntary - voluntary servitude - legal slavery to the collective STATE.
(BTW - no communist nation achieved true communism. All admit that they have only reached SOCIALISM...)
COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.
SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary
Socialism and its cousin, communism, are diametrically opposed to absolute ownership by individuals. They will only tolerate qualified ownership (aka "estate"), shared with the State, and you know who has the superior claim...
Stop paying your socialist taxes, and see WHO REALLY OWNS YOU AND YOURS.
So what "WING" is really flying over the United States of America?
LEFT WING
There are NO right wing partisans out there, tramping about, advocating natural and personal liberty, and sovereignty of the American people. The extremists of both sides are left wing - and are quite effective in distracting debate of the REAL issue.
The U.S. Constitution is effectively bypassed by the "consent" (via compact) that each American has under FICA. You can't be an advocate for "constitutional" government and participate in socialist insecurity - the bane of private property ownership.
(No alleged "right wing" / conservative politician dare utter that frightening thought :
Repeal Social Security and all the income transfer entitlement programs.)
I repeat: American politics have been entirely LEFT WING since 1935.
Welcome to the 'United Socialist States of America' - a wholly owned subsidiary of the World Bank and IMF.
=============================
References:
INHERENT POWERS - Those which are enjoyed by the possessors of
natural right, without having been received from another. Such are the powers of a people to establish a form of government, of a father to control his children.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p. 1170
ABSOLUTE RIGHTS - ... which are such as appertain and belong to particular men, merely as
individuals or single persons...
NATURAL RIGHTS - ... are the rights of life, liberty, privacy, and good reputation.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p. 1324
Natural liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind, of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consonant to their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and that they do not in any way abuse it to the prejudice of other men."
- - - Bouvier's Law Dictionary
NATURAL LIBERTY - The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the law of nature. The right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner in which they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere in the equal exercise of the same rights by other men. 1 Blackstone's Commentaries, 123,
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth edition, p.919
" We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed."
Declaration of Independence, 1776
This begs the question - how did a government instituted to secure rights to life, liberty, privacy, etc., get the power to deny said rights, as in the case of conscription? Being compelled to train, fight and, if necessary, die, on command, is a violation of inalienable rights. How / when did we, the people, give consent, and surrender our birthright, our endowment from Our Creator, of inalienable rights, freedoms, natural liberties?
At birth?
Do you recall being asked to give consent to be governed?
Perhaps they forgot that lesson in the Socialist Studies class.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The "REAL RIGHT WING"
