Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-17-2009, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,937,590 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
This is a broken record of yours.
You must be joking. Does the left realize everytime they hold up Medicare/Medicaid/SS as well-run government entities, they walk away with egg on their faces?

Those three stellar "businesses" have 50+ TRILLION dollars in unfunded liabilities. Is that what any sane, rational person would call well-run?

Hello??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2009, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,937,590 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Barbara Boxer's DC office's phone goes straight to voice mail, which says it's full. But I called both her local (Los Angeles) office, as well as her Sacramento office and left a piece of my mind.

Dianne Feinstein got an earful, too.

Jane Harman's next, but the boss got here, so I had to get back to my real work.
You still don't get it. Those "girls" don't matter. They will most likely follow the obama line, except maybe for Feinstein.

It is those conservative/moderate democrats in conservative districts that matter.

We all know the liberal kooks in the congress will vote party line, regardless of whether the bill is a crap sandwich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 06:15 PM
 
3,292 posts, read 4,473,578 times
Reputation: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Public Option is DEAD, it's Single Payer or NOTHING
Medicare for ALL
or Medicare for NONE
Based on the political discourse I've seen over the last several years Americans deserves neither Medicare nor a single payer system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,693,227 times
Reputation: 9980
Throw out all of these Bills
Medicare for ALL
or Medicare for NONE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 06:44 PM
 
2,324 posts, read 7,623,028 times
Reputation: 1067
No problem, once the bill is passed there will be amendment after amendment to bring it back up to its original intention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Michaux State Forest
1,275 posts, read 3,415,042 times
Reputation: 1441
If this is true and the current administration has allowed a bunch of lying thugs who will go against ANYTHING Obama proposes simply because they are still angry over losing the election, then I am truly disgusted. When are the Dems going to stand up and stop allowing themselves to be bullied? The current state of health care in America is a disgrace and leaving it in the hands of insurance co.s is just not a viable option. God help us all if things are allowed to continue as they have been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 08:13 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,904 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You still don't get it. Those "girls" don't matter. They will most likely follow the obama line, except maybe for Feinstein.

It is those conservative/moderate democrats in conservative districts that matter.

We all know the liberal kooks in the congress will vote party line, regardless of whether the bill is a crap sandwich.
You mean bribed Democrats; the so-called "Blue Shield" Democrats.


Like Fido Baucus, who is #4 in the race for Industry $$, or Spot Konrad who's also up there in bribes taken.

But enough of "debating" with the fringe, here's what's really going on:

After listening to all sides (meaningful sides) in this weekend's calamity, the following facts have emerged:

1. Nothing re: Public Option has changed. Obama, being the Corporatist he is, awaits the actions of Congress where every committee but Fido's has cleared the Bill WITH a Public Option, albeit a watered down one, but still a valid one, and NOT a industry sponsored "Health Care Cooperative" that won't do jack s*it as far as eliminating preexisting conditions or bringing down costs.

Granted, the corporate media would like us to think public option is out the window (and on that "hope" and hype the Health care Sector was the only sector up in today's Wall Street slide.), but it ain't so.

To the negative, however, "Nothing has changed." Obama still won't say that the Bill MUST contain a public option, something that 76% of Americans want, because he is Obama- the charlatan Corporatist who ran as a Progressive.

2. There is a move underfoot to downplay all this with Sibelius, Douglass, and the Admin Press Secretary, Gibbs. So don't believe a word they say, either good or bad.

3. The unanticipated spinoff of all this is a really POed Progressive wing, and since they are the ones who elected Obama, everyone who isn't floating in Industry bribes, like Spot and Fido, is taking notice:

Mark Weiner (D-NY) says any Bill without a public option will die in the House, as the Progressives will kill it.

Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) made a similiar threat in the Senate, though in all honesty, "The Millionaires Club" could still broker a deal between the Republicans and the bought.

4. Suddenly, Reconcilation (as a process where only 51 votes are needed) is not being discussed. And that is because the corporate media and the rented Democrats are the only ones the system will allow to speak on the mike.

But that's where we come in.............

5. Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone), on Mattow, said that this "Will be an albatross around the neck of Democrats like the war was around the Republicans" if no real reform passes.

I'll go him one better than that:

It will end the end of the Democratic Party as we know it.

Pretty hi'falutin' stuff, but it has major ramifications beyond that:

The Republicans, despite the Dems problems, are not a resurgent party.

If the fragile (and conflicting) coalitions that hold the Dems together unravels, as it will sans public option, then we will be back to the 1992 election, as far as electorial politics is concerned.

Meaning a major third party, and a President by plurality.

Or, it could be worse:

Luckily we had FDR during the 30's Depression to give us political stability. Imagine if you will, the polar opposite of that:

A time of economic catacylsm, combined with the type on systemic instability we saw when LBJ was prevented from seeking a second term due to his Vietnam policy.

That could be the ultimate outcome of all this.

Last edited by Geechie North; 08-17-2009 at 08:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 08:14 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,102 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill61 View Post
Don't count on it. We creamed your butts in November. We have a mandate. We WILL make it happen. Too bad for you.


Is this your mandate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 08:17 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,904 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings View Post

Is this your mandate?
FYI, That loss of approval is coming mainly from Progressives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,937,590 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
5. Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone), on Mattow, said that this "Will be an albatross around the neck of Democrats like the war was around the Republicans" if no real reform passes.

I'll go him one better than that:

It will end the end of the Democratic Party as we know it.
If they rahm through a massive government takeover of HC, the country will be up in arms and the democrats will lose the house and possibly the senate.

The left-wing kooks DO NOT constitute a majority of the party. The house members who are vulnerable are in conservative districts, not liberal ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top