Barney Frank Confronts Woman At Town Hall Comparing Obama To Hitler (deaths, stereotypes)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, right, I forgot - - - America's national socialism is VOLUNTARY servitude.
Another uneducated post. Socialism and national socialism are two very different things. As I doubt that you'll do any real research, why don't you read the Wikipedia entries at least.
Another uneducated post. Socialism and national socialism are two very different things. As I doubt that you'll do any real research, why don't you read the Wikipedia entries at least.
Please provide documented proof that socialism (which abolishes private property ownership) is any different from national socialism (which abolishes private property ownership)?
Please provide proof that private property ownership exists in the United Socialist States of America.
------------------------
References in support:
Amendment V, US Constitution 1789
... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
From the Communist manifesto: "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Most Americans would be surprised to learn that private property rights were abolished by voluntary enrollment into national socialism (aka Socialist InSecurity). Since 1935, the U.S. government has been LEFTIST, whether Demopublican or Republicrat.
PRIVATE PROPERTY - "As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels."
- - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217
If the government takes your property for public use - and does not pay just compensation - then you have absolute proof that you do not own private property anymore.
COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.
SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary
Socialism and its cousin, communism, are diametrically opposed to absolute ownership by individuals. They will only tolerate qualified ownership, shared with the State, and you know who has the superior claim...
Stop paying your socialist taxes, and see WHO REALLY OWNS YOU AND YOURS.
It is painfully obvious to the world that if you had to pick the most accepting party out of democrats and republicans, democrats would win in a landslide.
Democrats are accepting of the Boy Scouts?
How about AIG employees?
How about gays in California and Oregon that Democrats said can't get married? Democarts oppressing gays? How can this be. Must be Nazis. LOLs.
How about Robert Byrd? Former KKK member. Is he accepting of different groups?
What about the minister that was protesting those military funerals in Kansas? Saying people were going to hell for being homos. Or something to that effect. He's a registerd Democrat.
How about the Duke lacrosse players? Libs convicted them before they were even charged. Accepting of them?
How come Dick Durbin a Democrat Senator from Illinois can refer to American soldiers as Nazis and nobody on the left cares? I guess you all aren't accepting of U.S. troops either.
Yeh, Democrats are the most accepting people on earth. LOLs.
Please provide documented proof that socialism (which abolishes private property ownership) is any different from national socialism (which abolishes private property ownership)?
Please provide proof that private property ownership exists in the United Socialist States of America.
------------------------
References in support:
Amendment V, US Constitution 1789
... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
From the Communist manifesto: "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Most Americans would be surprised to learn that private property rights were abolished by voluntary enrollment into national socialism (aka Socialist InSecurity). Since 1935, the U.S. government has been LEFTIST, whether Demopublican or Republicrat.
PRIVATE PROPERTY - "As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels."
- - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217
If the government takes your property for public use - and does not pay just compensation - then you have absolute proof that you do not own private property anymore.
COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.
SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary
Socialism and its cousin, communism, are diametrically opposed to absolute ownership by individuals. They will only tolerate qualified ownership, shared with the State, and you know who has the superior claim...
Stop paying your socialist taxes, and see WHO REALLY OWNS YOU AND YOURS.
How many times are you going to copy and paste Webster dictionary entries on this forum? Go do the research, maybe even read a book. You'll have to pull yourself up out of the idiocy by doing the work yourself.
You think that your use of the term "retarded" insults Democrats? Your use of the term insults those with special needs who are most often the object of that pejorative. Pure grade-school ignorance. Your parents should have taught you better.
LOLs. You get all sensitive. Thanks PC police. Retard is a pefectly acceptable word.
So what you are saying is that President Obama insults people of special needs when he says he looked like a contestant at the Special Olympics.
I forgot. How come liberals went after Miss California? Just because she had a differing opinion? How accepting is that?
Basically, Liberals are accepting and open-minded with others as long as others agree with everyting they think. The second anyone disagrees with them then they are Nazis, racists, and all sorts of other ridiculous things.
I use the word retarded because it makes a point. You can't figure that out? LOL.
How about gays in California and Oregon that Democrats said can't get married? Democarts oppressing gays? How can this be. Must be Nazis. LOLs.
How about Robert Byrd? Former KKK member. Is he accepting of different groups?
What about the minister that was protesting those military funerals in Kansas? Saying people were going to hell for being homos. Or something to that effect. He's a registerd Democrat.
How about the Duke lacrosse players? Libs convicted them before they were even charged. Accepting of them?
How come Dick Durbin a Democrat Senator from Illinois can refer to American soldiers as Nazis and nobody on the left cares? I guess you all aren't accepting of U.S. troops either.
Yeh, Democrats are the most accepting people on earth. LOLs.
Ok now who are republicans accepting of other than old white men? Lol thats what I thought. I don't know if you noticed, but we just elected the first black president. That was obviously going to be democrats who broke that barrier.
good night all you liberals. I can't sit on this computer all night. Have a life to live you know.
As a word of advice. This is an internet forum. You all take this stuff too seriously. It is totally irrelevant to me what you think of healthcare, President Obam, President Bush or me. I could care less.
I mean, I oppose Obamacare or any government care and I'm uneducated intolerant and it's my fault the country is in the mess it is because I like George Bush. LOLs. Even though I didn't like George Bush. LOLs.
You all need to lighten up. That's another thing I have noticed about Libs. You guys take everything soooooooo seriously. Life is not all drama.
How many times are you going to copy and paste Webster dictionary entries on this forum? Go do the research, maybe even read a book. You'll have to pull yourself up out of the idiocy by doing the work yourself.
Thank you for your kind support of my data. Obviously you cannot produce any data to refute the points presented.
Socialism = piracy.
Voluntary charity is a blessing.
Compulsory charity is a curse.
Ok now who are republicans accepting of other than old white men? Lol thats what I thought. I don't know if you noticed, but we just elected the first black president. That was obviously going to be democrats who broke that barrier.
Yippie. Hooray for you. That's one thing I liked about President Obama. He doesn't seem overly concerned about race. Unlike the typical liberal who is obsessed with it.
It's funny you should mention that though. Alan Keyes ran in the Republican primaries in 1988 or 1992. I voted for him. Don't tell anyone. He's black. What would the neighbors think if they found out a southern white male voted for a black guy. So, guess what? I voted for a black guy before you did. So there.
Too bad about Keyes. He turned into this obsessive mainiac about abortion. He should have left that alone. It's here to stay. He probably would've done a good job with other things.
To review: Me, the evil southern white male voted for black guy for president before you, the accepting liberal. HaHaHaHaHaHa
Yippie. Hooray for you. That's one thing I liked about President Obama. He doesn't seem overly concerned about race. Unlike the typical liberal who is obsessed with it.
It's funny you should mention that though. Alan Keyes ran in the Republican primaries in 1988 or 1992. I voted for him. Don't tell anyone. He's black. What would the neighbors think if they found out a southern white male voted for a black guy. So, guess what? I voted for a black guy before you did. So there.
Too bad about Keyes. He turned into this obsessive mainiac about abortion. He should have left that alone. It's here to stay. He probably would've done a good job.
To review: Me, the evil southern white male voted for black guy for president before you, the accepting liberal. HaHaHaHaHaHa
Nice deflection there. Fact is, conservatives were unable to vote in a black man, while the liberals did in a landslide victory. Plus we are accepting of gay people, which your side deems to be evil. Thats the problem in conservatism, you never try to make progress in the world because you are so obsessed with the status quo. Have an open mind and actually think what is best for the country, rather than what is best for your party.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
