Cheney on Fox News Sunday; Coming after obama and holder once again (Condi Rice, Colin Powell)

[CharlottePirateFan]

Originally Posted by KsStorm

Gee... and I thought George W. Bush was the POTUS when 911 happened.

Kinda like how Barack is in charge during the worst unemployment, stock market, etc?

[burdell]

Originally Posted by CharlottePirateFan

Kinda like how Barack is in charge during the worst unemployment, stock market, etc?

Worst stock market? Having problems paying attention?

[grammy164]

Originally Posted by Hombre57

I was hoping for CARTER to be mentioned. Oh, s**T, now we're back to acorn again. LOL Can't you'all stay on the subject at all? and, is this all you've got? Maybe you'all ought to go back into the closet, and come back in 2012 with something different, that'll give you ample time to think up something else. LOL, you guys are a trip LOL. we're burned out on the same 'ol chili and beans, give us some meat.

The Clinton administration embraced what is being called “torture” now. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Audio: Clinton endorses “torture” in special cases; Update: World opinion opposes “torture”

Three minutes. The best part is at the very end, where Billy Jeff chuckles at the notion that anyone would oppose torture in a true ticking bomb situation. Reality-based, our BJ is.

From Richard Clarke's book, Against All Enemies--

Snatches, or more properly “extraordinary renditions,” were operations to apprehend terrorists abroad, usually without the knowledge of and almost always without public acknowledgment of the host government.... The first time I proposed a snatch, in 1993, the White House Counsel, Lloyd Cutler, demanded a meeting with the President to explain how it violated international law. Clinton had seemed to be siding with Cutler until Al Gore belatedly joined the meeting, having just flown overnight from South Africa. Clinton recapped the arguments on both sides for Gore: Lloyd says this. Dick says that. Gore laughed and said, “That’s a no-brainer. Of course it’s a violation of international law, that’s why it’s a covert action. The guy is a terrorist. Go grab his ass."

Gore Supported Extraordinary Rendition (Before He Didn’t Support It) | Say Anything: North Dakota's Most Popular Political Blog
Why no investigation of the democratic President? Of course this is political.

[sanrene]

Worst stock market? Having problems paying attention?

You must remember the liberal reaction to growth in the stock market during Bush? You guys spewed what a bad economy we had, even though the market was up, it was not indicative of anything, jobs creation was in the hundreds of thousands - that was bad, bad, bad.

You must remember?

[burdell]

Originally Posted by sanrene

You must remember the liberal reaction to growth in the stock market during Bush? You guys spewed what a bad economy we had, even though the market was up, it was not indicative of anything, jobs creation was in the hundreds of thousands - that was bad, bad, bad.

You must remember?

YOU apparently remember NOTHING!

DJIA 01/02/2001 $10,646

DJIA 01/16/2009 $ 8,281


A 22% LOSS is how the NeoConfused define GROWTH?

[GreenGene]

Originally Posted by sanrene

The President is the Chief Law Enforcement Official in the US.

I provided a link showing that this is wrong. Please provide a link showing that you're right (hint: you're not).

Originally Posted by sanrene

Now, let's talk about avoidance.

Let's.

I said:

"And when did those 8 years start? Couldn't have been when Bush first took office, since 9/11 happened almost 8 months into his first term. Please provide the starting date and ending date of the 8 years during which Bush kept us safe from attack."

And you said ... nothing. I take your silence to mean that, in fact, Bush did NOT keep us safe from attack for 8 years.

Fact 1: He was (regrettably) President for 8 years.

Fact 2: The worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor took place during his first year of office.

Fact 3: The first two facts are undeniable to any but the most rabid on the right end of the political spectrum.

C'mon - this isn't open to interpretation; this is simple math, and shouldn't be beyond your ability to grasp.

[Wapasha]

Originally Posted by sanrene

and rightfully so. They are playing politics with our national security to appease their kook-fringe left-wing base. They want to prosecute the men and women who kept this country safe for 8 years.

Appalling and shameful.

Here's a little tidbit; this should be a lovely interview that obama will have to respond to;

RealClearPolitics - Video - Cheney: Obama Should Not Undo Policies That Kept Country Safe

Apparently 0bama lacks the leadership to control his attorney general.

BTW, You forgot to capitalize "obama" which is why I use a "0" maybe you should use "0bama" too.

[Hombre57]

Originally Posted by southward bound

No, Obama wants to appear squeaky clean in this. Appearances are deceiving, especially when it involves politicians - in this case, Obama. Anyone who is falling for this is naive indeed.

I read through the posts, and commend Sanrene for putting up with all the insipid arguments. So far, Sanrene is way ahead.

Please post a picture of the crystal ball you two are looking into, we all want to see what it looks like.

[southward bound]

Originally Posted by Hombre57

Please post a picture of the crystal ball you two are looking into, we all want to see what it looks like.

Naw. No point. You'd tell us we're mesmerized.

Actually, you'd have to take your blinders off to see clearly.

[southward bound]

Originally Posted by Donna7

Pray? Why would we "pray"? You know darn well that we are all "godless liberals." We all know that the neo-cons pray to "god" - the god of power, greed, lies, deceit, death, and war - that is.

There are other gods. And then, there's the Higher Power that some call God.
Sorry that you don't know there are more than just those you mentioned.