Do you support the war on pornography? (illegal, abortion, party)

[Tone509]

Originally Posted by lionking

I see more of a problem that ways from mainstream tv and magazines then porn..Stand at a checkout counter and all you see is airbrushed "perfect" models on the covers.

I said it before,a girlfriend and I use to make our own,post it on a amateur site.Many ordinary people do and get positive responses.You dont need to be a super model and "perfect" because everybody has their own idea to what sexy is.Doing this actually helped my girlfriends esteem ,mine also.

I like voluptuous women,with curves and some fat.Normal society ala the media is the ones who say thats wrong.Id rather see a woman on the cover of cosmopolitan magazine wearing jeans with some tummy hanging over then some airbrushed thin model.

We have something in common, lionking.

(The preference for a full-figured woman, that is. Not putting our exploits on camera. )

[Tone509]

Originally Posted by citigirl

The ACLU has fought for homosexual NAMBLA the man love boy website even though they instruct on how to obtain children to molest. The ACLU said it was their Free Speech rights.

The material that NAMBLA would encourage people to watch is extreme, to say the least. If the ACLU truly advocated their on the behalf in the name of free speech, that would be disappointing. Needless to say, I would wholeheartedly support a "war" on child pornography.

[citigirl]

http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20070...4642-1644r.htm

ACLU ex-president charged in child-porn case
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 24, 2007



The ACLU was protectng one of their own.

[LeavingFlorida05]

Feed him to the wolves.

[PrettyHateMachine]

Originally Posted by citigirl

http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20070...4642-1644r.htm

ACLU ex-president charged in child-porn case
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 24, 2007



The ACLU was protectng one of their own.

The article makes no mention of the ACLU protecting him.

The ACLU is under no obligation to comment or protect a FORMER president of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia.

Former being the operative word.

You're going Hannity on me again.


You're right LF05, feed him to the wolves

[citigirl]

Originally Posted by PrettyHateMachine

The article makes no mention of the ACLU protecting him.

The ACLU is under no obligation to comment or protect a FORMER president of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia.

Former being the operative word.

You're going Hannity on me again.


You're right LF05, feed him to the wolves

The point being that of course the ACLU would defend the homosexual NAMBLA organization when the guy running the place at the time was into child porn himself.

[KerrTown]

Why not? The Christianofacist leaders would be very happy on the outside. But in the inside, they do those things in secret anyway and won't get arrested. The only thing that this "war" affects is the less powerful common people. Lets watch it fail like the War on Terror, the War on Drugs, the War on Poverty.

[texanborn]

Originally Posted by citigirl

The ACLU has fought for homosexual NAMBLA the man love boy website even though they instruct on how to obtain children to molest. The ACLU said it was their Free Speech rights.

If you ask me I think the ACLU is tearing this country apart and should be listed as a hate group....And just because the ACLU says something is ok dosen't mean it is.....I think at one time in the past the ACLU had done good things but now as I said they have become nothing but a hate group for the left.....

[citigirl]

Originally Posted by texanborn

If you ask me I think the ACLU is tearing this country apart and should be listed as a hate group....And just because the ACLU says something is ok dosen't mean it is.....I think at one time in the past the ACLU had done good things but now as I said they have become nothing but a hate group for the left.....

and we pay for these left wing liberal p**s with our tax dollars! That's the outrage!

[burdell]

Originally Posted by citigirl

and we pay for these left wing liberal p**s with our tax dollars! That's the outrage!

And we pay for religious properties by having to make up the taxes they do not pay, THAT's the outrage, especially the churches that attempt to wield political power, let them pay like everyone else.