Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you feel the GOP abuses this word, picking a choosing what they deem "Socialist" as it
Of course they are 15 34.09%
Willful ignorance is bliss 1 2.27%
All of the above, an embarrassment to this country 28 63.64%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-03-2009, 01:53 PM
 
674 posts, read 1,619,358 times
Reputation: 279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Socialism = piracy
Socialism = collective ownership (piracy)
Socialism = anticapitalism (against private property ownership)
Socialism = deception (NO one voluntarily gives up their property!)
Socialism = evil, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.

Demopublicans and Republicrats - both embrace socialism, and do not defend private property rights.

What a bunch of ignorant, uneducated b.s.!

I own properties in Europe (and here), I own companies, I have the freedom to do whatever I want - in fact, in most respect I have much more freedom there than here.
The government doesn't own my companies or properties! That's absurd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2009, 01:57 PM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,685,593 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by antibes View Post
What a bunch of ignorant, uneducated b.s.!

I own properties in Europe (and here), I own companies, I have the freedom to do whatever I want - in fact, in most respect I have much more freedom there than here.
The government doesn't own my companies or properties! That's absurd.
You obviously don't understand the concept of the Constitution of the United States. Additionally, WE DON'T WANT TO BE EUROPE.

You can't convince us. Not interested. Our GNP speaks volumes about maintaining our economic theories.

Please stop trying to convince Americans that Europes ways are "right". We don't try to convience you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 01:59 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,522,834 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
When the "rights" Americans think they are owed become an "equalizing" of America, then that is socialism. When the "basics" are not good enough and people want "the best" for everyone, that is socialism.

It's a fine line and I can see where healthcare is walking that line. Some people want a public option "as good as" what Congress has and will not be happy with basic care.

When CEO salaries are capped by the government because people "feel" the figure is too high, that is socialism.

Envy drives socialism. It's the "I want what he has" mentality. Doesn't matter that he earns more, has more education, lucked out. When socialism creeps in, what matters is "he has it and I don't".
Thank you for proving the OP's point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:03 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,522,834 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
1. Bush was a liberal socialist. Obama is just more of a socialist.

2. Medicare won't be around when I retire. It is just another tax for me

3. The Vets EARNED thier healthcare. Deadbeats did not

4. Do I tell my partents that social security is for dead beats? Yes- they are liberals so they think it is okay. I don't.

5. Did I scream about national parks and roads? No they are national resources and a means of conducting commerce, not a blank check to dead beats. Both are useful. Dead beats are not useful for anything but consumption.

6. March in the streets? I have a bad knee. I don't march for anything.

7. Ignorant? The average IQ of a republican is higher than the average democrat. Democrats must be VERY IGNORANT.


Pay for all the crap you want yourself. You libs are greedy and selfish and demand that others pay for everything you want, while shirking your fiscal responsibility.
The lazy bums "argument." Thank you for proving the OP's point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:07 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,625,388 times
Reputation: 3028
I've been hearing the term socialism about as frequently as the left threw out the word fascism when Bush was in office. I'm sure the lefties that were spouting fascism are of the can dish it out but not take it group....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:09 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,522,834 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
That is in the future. Are you dismissing what happened in the past like it doesn't count ? We lost billions with GM and now the government has a majority stake. That is the here and NOW.
Borrowing money is not socialist. Indeed, it's about as capitalist as it gets.

When you take out a loan for a car, who owns the car? That's right. The bank. GM borrowed money from the government. Guess who owns GM? That's right.

When you pay off your loan, the car becomes owned by you. When GM pays off its loan, with interest, government ownership ceases. This is how capitalism works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:11 PM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,685,593 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Thank you for proving the OP's point.
Actually no, he isn't really that far off.

Though his examples aren't text book definitions of socialism, they are inherently socialist concepts required to be accepted before full fledged socialism reigns in.

The idea that money can be taken from some, by the government, and distributed through the populace is infact socialist in nature. The reason being, the government has no money of their own beyond what they collect from the citizens. Thus taking dollars from a private enterprise, weather that be a corporation or individual, and re-allocating that money to somebody else is infact controlling the production of the enterprise.

Plus, I would like to point out, why wont you debate my example with me? Is it because you know that the GM bailout WAS infact socialism at its finest?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:12 PM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,685,593 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
The lazy bums "argument." Thank you for proving the OP's point.

Hmmm... taking all the easy targets are we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:13 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,522,834 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
I misunderstood nothing. You attempted to state that people that say "socialist" are ignorant to what that means. I am saying... stop calling people ignorant, and prove your points on their merits of the discussion rather than going after the people who raise points.
  • Main Entry: so·cial·ism
  • Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
  • Function: noun
  • Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done



Obama assumed the role of the Board of Directors of General Motors. He then asked for the resignation of GM. He then produced a reconstruction plan for the company. I don't care if its short lived or not... thats as socialist as it gets. Thats socialism to a text book definition (See number 1 above)

No matter how you spin it, that little tid bit of history is complete SOCIALISM.

You don't agree?
GM != the means of production, so it's not even "partial" socialism.

Furthermore, GM borrowed the money. It's a loan, not a government takeover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:15 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,522,834 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
Hmmm... taking all the easy targets are we?
I'm already running late, so yes, I guess I am. Talk to you later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top