Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the explosion of blogging along with all of the other media forms we have now, we are going to see a derangement syndrome with all presidents from now on. Things were rough with the Reps and Clinton, but then it just exploded when Bush was elected. Now Obama is in and it is just as bad. Tiresome I have to say.
The development of a substitute for traditional media is a wonderful development.
Without it, the WH narrative regarding Van Jones would be to continue to deny he is a 911 truther; however, we know through the blogosphere that in 9/11/2002 Van Jones gave a keynote address to a truther rally.
All I need are the facts. The MSM does not with frequency report the news: who, what, where, when, why and how. Seems editors run the papers and news anymore, and we as consumers get stuck with Op-Eds and slanted opinions disguised as news in lieu of what's really going on in the nation/world.
And in 2006, John McCain spoke at an ACORN rally, and you all saw fit to nominate him for President. If all you need are the facts, there are some...what do you make of them?
The development of a substitute for traditional media is a wonderful development.
Indeed it is.
Quote:
Seems editors run the papers and news anymore, and we as consumers get stuck with Op-Eds and slanted opinions disguised as news in lieu of what's really going on in the nation/world.
You are quite right only the blogsphere reports facts objectively and without interjecting opinion!
And in 2006, John McCain spoke at an ACORN rally, and you all saw fit to nominate him for President. If all you need are the facts, there are some...what do you make of them?
What in heavens are you talking about? Do you have some random ongoing conversation in your head that you occassional blurt out, leaving your audience confused as how its relative or relates to the ongoing discussion.
LOL. The so-called "blogosphere" is the nothing but the technolgical equivalent of 1950's stay-at-home-Mom's gossiping over the backyard fence. Yeah, some of those women were very intelligent and some very good and original ideas were discussed and debated while hanging the day's laundry out to dry. But 99.9% of it was pure schlock and drivel...just as is the case today...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
no clue
