Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I haven't read where any court has rendered res judicata precluding Orly form seeking another venue for further action. As for collateral estopple, again correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't that require the case to have actually been litigated?
Right on both counts.
You are on your toes today, catto!
But there can be a judicial error challenge without having had previous actual litigation.
I am surprised that all comments & old posts have been deleted. You can still leave a comment on the About & Blog Rules pages. I hope its a just a joke as the joke from Santa Margarita surely isn't done yet.
he's back!
he said he'd occasionally comment when taitz made a particularly ludicrous claim - then he made 6 or so posts over the weekend. ha!
when she gets disbarred we're all going to have to join orly anonymous.
The courts decline to hear most appeals. They only hear those that have merit.
Not so. the Supreme Court, whose caseload is made up almost entirely of certiorari cases, has almost complete discretion over what cases it hears, and accepts a tiny and declining minority of those cases.
In the federal system, most cases that go to the Court of Appeals are appeals of right. The court of appeals doesn't have the discretion to refuse to consider them.
Things may vary in the various state court systems, but I am not aware of a single state system that doesn't provide for at least one level of appellate review by right, as opposed to at the discretion of the court.
My apologies if this is a repeat post..........I just saw this on Huffington Post and found myself laughing out loud. Does anyone remember Lucas Smith? Check out Page 9 of the Lucas Smith Declaration.
"Smith also reveals that Taitz stopped speaking to him after he told people that she was sleeping with Charles Lincoln, a member of her legal team. And he describes in detail Lincoln, who has been disbarrSmith also reveals that Taitz stopped speaking to him after he told people that she was sleeping with Charles Lincoln, a member of her legal team. And he describes in detail Lincoln, who has been disbarred in three states, relating his opinion of Taitz's sexual performance.ed in three states, relating his opinion of Taitz's sexual performance."
My apologies if this is a repeat post..........I just saw this on Huffington Post and found myself laughing out loud. Does anyone remember Lucas Smith?
She also asked Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had oral sex with Obama, to lie under oath.
Judge Land today entered an Order of Final Judgment in the Rhodes v MacDonald case in GA, authorizing collection efforts to begin against Orly.
Quote:
"Orly Taitz has failed to pay the $20,000.00 sanction ordered by the Court on October 13, 2009. Accordingly, the Clerk is ordered to enter final judgment in favor of the United States of America and against Orly Taitz in the principal amount of $20,000.00. The United States Attorney is authorized and directed to collect the judgment as provided by law.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of November, 2009. "
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
