Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:20 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

According to Judge Andrew Napalotano, the Government cannot deny coverage to illegals, if it provides coverage to others.

This thread was moved, who know why, by moderators (apparently) to a totally unrelated thread.

Napalotano is a Constitutional Attorney, and he says that the government cannot descriminate. If it provedes coverage for one class, it must provide for all.

The Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to a CA proposition that granted coverage to illegals. Thus, Napalotano says, illegals are covered under the Obama plan, no matter what he says.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:23 PM
 
Location: OUTTA SIGHT!
3,018 posts, read 3,565,078 times
Reputation: 1899
Maybe if you post a few more threads like this then the people just reading thread titles will take this lie seriously.

Or....maybe not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:29 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by brubaker View Post
Maybe if you post a few more threads like this then the people just reading thread titles will take this lie seriously.

Or....maybe not.
This isn't a lie. Napalotano is a Constitutional Attorney with impeccable credentials. He was merely commenting on Obama's statement that his plan did not cover illegals. Napalotoano said that the Supreme Court has already ruled (because they refused to hear the case), based on a California propsition that illegals must be covered. He said that Obama should know this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:32 PM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,535,211 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
This isn't a lie. Napalotano is a Constitutional Attorney with impeccable credentials. He was merely commenting on Obama's statement that his plan did not cover illegals. Napalotoano said that the Supreme Court has already ruled (because they refused to hear the case), based on a California propsition that illegals must be covered. He said that Obama should know this.

You actually started a NEW thread on this without doing your homework. Damn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:33 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
So, who's moving the threads around and why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:35 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
You actually started a NEW thread on this without doing your homework. Damn.
Without doing my "homework"? You mean I can't start a thread based on the opinion of a well respected Constitutional Attorney?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:35 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
You actually started a NEW thread on this without doing your homework. Damn.
Judge Napalotano is indeed a constitutional lawyer with impeccable credentials, he even opposed Bush on things like the Patriot Act because he believes it violated the Constitution..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:36 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
I want to know who moved my thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:37 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,032,019 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
I want to know who moved my thread.
I suppose the same moderator who removed my satirical request for the same information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:38 PM
 
6,734 posts, read 9,338,075 times
Reputation: 1857
I have been looking on the internet and I can't find any Napolitano statements that refute was the president said. However, I did find couple of message board posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top