U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2009, 05:27 PM
Status: ""a mind that understands science"" (set 8 days ago)
 
18,803 posts, read 12,121,836 times
Reputation: 10236

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber_factory View Post
Looking at the data, one could also conclude that teen birth rates are highest in states with the most sunshine.

One could also conclude that teen birth rates are highest in states with the highest temperatures.

One could also conclude that teen birth rates are highest in states with the highest % of minorities.

One could also conclude that teen birth rates are highest in states with the highest violent crime.

etc..

Correct- again, it is a type 2 logic error and presents "factual" data, upon which a fallacious assumption is made. That is why mulitple "t" tests are not statistically valid when determining the impact of multiple variables upon one measured outcome. The possibility that this "factor" is chance increases as the number of contributing factors increases. Therefore, as noted above, an ANOVA analysis with a Neuman-Keuls correction for multiple variables must be used to be statistically correct.

Again, this is an excellent example of how "facts" can be massaged, using poor logic and poor statistics, to enforce a fallacious conclusion. You will see this error often even in respected journals, such as NEJM, which is suprising. When these errors are reported to them, to thier credit, they do make an erratum report, but the damage is already done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2009, 05:35 PM
 
Location: New Mexico to Texas
4,552 posts, read 13,428,775 times
Reputation: 2125
at least New Mexico came in second, we are always trying to catch up to Mississippi it seems in every category.

this one category happens to be a good thing cause it keeps the boys in high school busy with girls that dont mind having a little fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Santa Barbara
1,474 posts, read 2,638,852 times
Reputation: 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Birth rates are higher. Those who practice religion do not believe in killing.


So yes more religious staes will have higher birth rates. I anm willing to gamble they have much lower abortions also.
When you believe life is sacred you have a tendency not to kill babies
This is what irritates me, IF you are religious and against abortion shouldn't you ALSO be against premarital sex? So you are saying they are picking and choosing what they want to follow? It sounds like they are practicing religion in a half-a$$ed way.

Here is something interesting I found:

Who's having abortions (religion)?
Women identifying themselves as Protestants obtain 37.4% of all abortions in the U.S.; Catholic women account for 31.3%, Jewish women account for 1.3%, and women with no religious affiliation obtain 23.7% of all abortions. 18% of all abortions are performed on women who identify themselves as "Born-again/Evangelical".
Abortion Statistics

According to THIS, which who knows how valid it is, religious folks have more abortions than those that claim no religious affiliation. Evangelicals are slightly lower than the non-religious but they DO have them.

Last edited by jillz; 09-17-2009 at 05:39 PM.. Reason: cleaning up bad pasting job!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
86,883 posts, read 102,281,764 times
Reputation: 32946
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillz View Post
This is what irritates me, IF you are religious and against abortion shouldn't you ALSO be against premarital sex? So you are saying they are picking and choosing what they want to follow? It sounds like they are practicing religion in a half-a$$ed way.

Here is something interesting I found:

Who's having abortions (religion)?
Women identifying themselves as Protestants obtain 37.4% of all abortions in the U.S.; Catholic women account for 31.3%, Jewish women account for 1.3%, and women with no religious affiliation obtain 23.7% of all abortions. 18% of all abortions are performed on women who identify themselves as "Born-again/Evangelical".
Abortion Statistics

According to THIS, which who knows how valid it is, religious folks have more abortions than those that claim no religious affiliation. Evangelicals are slightly lower than the non-religious but they DO have them.
Well, we need to know how many people "claim" these religions. The distribution looks fairly accurate to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 05:57 PM
 
8,640 posts, read 7,951,915 times
Reputation: 2854
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
U.S. states whose residents have more conservative religious beliefs on average tend to have higher rates of teenagers giving birth, a new study suggests.

Mississippi topped the list for both conservative religious beliefs and teen birth rates.

Teen birth rates highest in most religious states - Kids and parenting- msnbc.com

That would be because they are less likely to kill their baby, but you didn't want to mention that did you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,700 posts, read 35,557,204 times
Reputation: 7951
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Ummm ahh....ahem...Excuse me...Mary was a virgin. Or do you know nothing about Christianity? Are you an atheist, or what? God chose Mary to be the birth mother of Jesus (God incarnate ... God can do anything ... He is God)

Obviously, you are not a believer. Too bad.
So what, did God dance the ***, went shazaam and there was jesus in her arms? She birthed him at 14, no? Doh!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 06:33 PM
 
820 posts, read 749,449 times
Reputation: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
U.S. states whose residents have more conservative religious beliefs on average tend to have higher rates of teenagers giving birth, a new study suggests.

Mississippi topped the list for both conservative religious beliefs and teen birth rates.

Teen birth rates highest in most religious states - Kids and parenting- msnbc.com
For the love of Pete. I think that is the dumbest article I've ever read. I'm not expecting people to think for themselves though, that takes effort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 06:46 PM
 
24 posts, read 21,951 times
Reputation: 14
Take Kansas for example, They have been a RED state in every single presidential since 1972.
They are also known for shooting abortion doctors in church. Thus, what choice is left to these girls?
A coat hanger?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 07:37 AM
 
25,782 posts, read 38,999,165 times
Reputation: 13783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daysleepin View Post
Take Kansas for example, They have been a RED state in every single presidential since 1972.
They are also known for shooting abortion doctors in church. Thus, what choice is left to these girls?
A coat hanger?
Give them the birth control pill! I don't see how this can interfere with religion...I can see that some have issues with abortion and I'm not a fan of it either, just in cases of rape or if you already used protection and still got pregnant and in case the fetus is showing many signs of being severe sick...

I'm against abortus just to use it as a birth control prevention and specially after a certain amount of weeks that is baby killing!

Better give them the pill or morning after pill, that can save a lot of issues!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
71,683 posts, read 83,258,368 times
Reputation: 41529
Quote:
Originally Posted by desert sun View Post
at least New Mexico came in second, we are always trying to catch up to Mississippi it seems in every category.

this one category happens to be a good thing cause it keeps the boys in high school busy with girls that dont mind having a little fun.
Well you need to catch up with AR as well, not on this but on the worst educated kids. I know you probably lead in drop out rate, at least the ABQ district does, but we lead on overall education. Well we are just behind Mississippi and about even with WV.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top