Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2007, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingFlorida05 View Post
That's just it, silas. The nature of medical care is that there is no competition. It's similar to a utility. Health care is far from being a free market. That's why free market solutions don't work.

health care cannot be run like FPL or Comcast. The system in this country does NOT work. Anyone with a child or relative who has been critically ill can tell you that.

It is incredible to me that people are not concerned about this. I guess it is denial.


sunny
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2007, 09:21 AM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,608 posts, read 21,394,406 times
Reputation: 10111
Its my understanding that hospitals cannot turn you away from emergency care,though they will hound you and possibly ruin you for the payments.

If you own a house,can a lien be put on it or other assets you own?

looking for more thoughts on possible solutions to this insurance crisis.more opinions?

thanks.

Last edited by lionking; 05-03-2007 at 10:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Naples
1,247 posts, read 926,558 times
Reputation: 344
I don't know if a lien can by filed against your house if you have an unpaid medical debt.

When people need medical care, choices are made under duress. A fundamental aspect of free market economics is that choices are NOT made under duress. That's why free market solutions fail. If you have a heart attack, the EMTs don't give you a list of hospitals, payment plans, etc. They take you to the closest hospital. It's essentially a monopoly. I wouldn't change that aspect of health care, because that's just not reasonable. We just need a better way to control costs, fraud, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971
looking for more thoughts on possible solutions to this insurance crisis.more opinions?
________________
I just read that CT is trying to enact a new healthcare option- the premiums are capped at a max of 200.00 per month. I will try and acquire more updated info. And yes- the can put a lien on your house- my neighbor was harassed by Tenet healthcare -the ambulance (for a 5 minute ride) tried to make him pay 1900.00. He even had to have an attorney get it out of collections.

sunny
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:01 AM
 
Location: The great state of New Hampshire
793 posts, read 3,122,300 times
Reputation: 457
<<It is incredible to me that people are not concerned about this.>>

I don't think that is the issue for most who are opposed to government sponsored health care. The issue is what makes the politician a spokesman and expert in the medical field and in the very complicated realm of medical billing procedure. Of course we've seen the overwhelming failure of big government time after time. If there is any legitimate government interest on this topic, it should be tort reform, eliminating the absurd lawsuits and many of the ridiculous lump sum awards, no thanks in part to your lovely ambulance chasing, trial lawyers, including the "altruistic" Caped Crusader himself, Mr. John Edwards.
I wonder also how many people are exactly aware of how much cost, how many bureaucratic chains one must infiltrate in order to patent a new drug, a new medicine. You might be in for a wee bit of shock. Even one entire gigantic bureaucracy in Washington DC (FDA) isn't satisfactory enough according to your government to oversee the health supplement industry (yes herbals, protein powders, and other non-prescribed items). Issues such has health care are understandably going to inflict alot of emotional knee-jerk style solutions. But a good train of thought I wish more possessed when it comes to issues such as this, public education funding, etc... is to study up and "think hard, government might just be the problem in the first place". More government very likely will proliferate the problem in regards to choices, quality of care, and certainly even higher taxes that won't just fall on the "rich". It isn't about a libertine approach. Government oversight is one thing. Bureaucratic red tape is another.

Last edited by unknown stuntman; 05-03-2007 at 10:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Naples
1,247 posts, read 926,558 times
Reputation: 344
Good points, unknown stuntman.

A major difference I would like to point out with education is that it's a decision that is not made under duress. It's much different than riding in an ambulance to the hospital. I am all for free market solutions when it comes to education, because education IS a free market (for the most part).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971
wonder also how many people are exactly aware of how much cost, how many bureaucratic chains one must infiltrate in order to patent a new drug, a new medicine. You might be in for a wee bit of shock.
__________________________________________

No NO shock My brother is a physician. Also trial lawyers-lol- that is a bush ism and unrelated- This is a MAJOR problem in the US. It is FAILING. It needs to be fixed. I will not weep for Pfizer- you are mistaking me for the uninformed with these scare tactics.

When someone in your immediate family becomes critically ill, and you have a 5 figure lien put on your house maybe you will understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:07 AM
 
4,273 posts, read 15,253,371 times
Reputation: 3419
This is a little off topic but my question is, if companies get discounts on insurance because of employee volume, why can't the ones that aren't insured be put in their own "group" and the gov't can help alleviate some of the premiums or *gasp* the insurance can have a heart and work with the uninsured?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 10:49 AM
 
Location: The great state of New Hampshire
793 posts, read 3,122,300 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyhelena View Post
wonder also how many people are exactly aware of how much cost, how many bureaucratic chains one must infiltrate in order to patent a new drug, a new medicine. You might be in for a wee bit of shock.
__________________________________________

No NO shock My brother is a physician. Also trial lawyers-lol- that is a bush ism and unrelated- This is a MAJOR problem in the US. It is FAILING. It needs to be fixed. I will not weep for Pfizer- you are mistaking me for the uninformed with these scare tactics. .

No scare tactics intended. Do I have a concrete solution? No. I am just telling who ever reads the post to be aware of what sounds like a "sweet deal". I spent time in a medical billing office w/ handling the in-and-outs and the more experience I got, the more I actually just felt I was on the "out". It is a complicated and confusing mess, even for the seemingly simplest of medical procedures. But some times the most complicated messes are what bureaucracies create.
The "trial lawyer" aspect is not only relevant, but needs to be pointed out because I hear alot less of it through the mainstream media and even these boards than I do of greedy pharmaceutical companies, who of course share a burden of the blame as well. The "Bushism" comment has zero relevancy, especially since I am far from being a supporter. Tort reform is and has been a huge issue and no one is stepping to the plate: not Bush, not Clinton, not your lovely Congressional leaders in your district. Perhaps Bush has made mention of it, but obviously most every thing out of our politicans' mouth is simply double talk. Surprise, surprise. There is plenty of blame to pass around, regardless of what percentage of blame falls where. The last person however I want to hear from in regards to a plan for universal health care is John Edwards: as two-faced a hypocrite as the next politician. This "plan" of his, he keeps supposedly elaborating on has never made ANY mention to tort reform. Big surprise.

Last edited by unknown stuntman; 05-03-2007 at 11:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 11:02 AM
 
Location: The great state of New Hampshire
793 posts, read 3,122,300 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingFlorida05 View Post
Good points, unknown stuntman.

A major difference I would like to point out with education is that it's a decision that is not made under duress. It's much different than riding in an ambulance to the hospital. I am all for free market solutions when it comes to education, because education IS a free market (for the most part).

Very true and I think that would be an excellent debate of how much of this really currently is the free-market at force when discussing our current healthcare system. I'm all for free market when it truly is free market. I am "conservative" in plenty of my philosophies but I digress from alot of these conservatives as to what exactly entails "free market" and "capitalism" at play. Health care I'm an open book right now. When I hear "free market" as it applies to say, oil and gas price issues, I cringe. I don't necessarily think the free market doesn't work. It is that I don't believe free market is even in action in the case of oil, because of government. As much as I hate big government and bureaucracy, it bothers me just as much when some complain about the meddling of big government only in convenient circumstances.

Last edited by unknown stuntman; 05-03-2007 at 11:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top