Chris Wallace; "Biggest bunch of Crybabies" (ethic, bias, rating)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the complete version, funny how that conveniently disappears to suit some agendas
How do those ommitted comments contradict Wallace's statement? He just said he recognizes the WH probably isn't fond of Fox News for some of it's hosts but that doesn't change his stance that the White House should not limit media access to Fox News for its conservative views.
Chris Wallace is so right. It seems the Obama camp is calling all networks to ask them to be nicer to the president, but on the other hand Obama doesn't even dare to come for just a simple interview because he is affraid to be treated badly...well that didn't keep the Rep. from going to these liberal networks...I agree Obama is a cry baby!
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,326 posts, read 54,344,425 times
Reputation: 40721
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan.
How do those ommitted comments contradict Wallace's statement? He just said he recognizes the WH probably isn't fond of Fox News for some of it's hosts but that doesn't change his stance that the White House should not limit media access to Fox News for its conservative views.
Uh, the omitted comments ARE Wallace's, HOW could they contradict him?
What they do is alter the context of the OP's rant. Of course, in the past she has demonstrated her only desire is to bash Obama, whether she understands the situation or not. She demonstrated this by replying to a sarcastic post mentioning Obama's decisions about barrage balloons and the cavalry by saying those decisions would lead to the US being attacked again, no concern for content, only OBAMA'S WRONG! OBAMA"S WRONG!
Not posting all of Wallace's comments is just another demonstration of that agenda.
This is the best laugh of the day! What would the left know about journalistic integrity? At least yoou get the news on FOX whereas all the liberal news stations will only report what they want to feed to public and ignoring anything they do not want the public to know. Jourlaism is DEAD on the liberal side. DEAD!
Fox News itself has sworn in court that it is NOT A NEWS ORGANIZATION AND IS THEREFORE NOT REQUIRED TO TELL THE TRUTH. That is what FOX SAYS ITSELF. So were they lying then...or now?
Ron Popeil does more interesting informercials than these guys...
More very insightful comments from you. Do you buy the Leninist Kool Aid by the economy size?
Chris Wallace came from CBS news and is the son of Mike Wallace. He is one of the most respected journalists around. I put him in the same category with (the late) Tim Russert. Sorry you have a tough time accepting facts and truth that don't jibe with your Leninist fantasies.
Fox News itself has sworn in court that it is NOT A NEWS ORGANIZATION AND IS THEREFORE NOT REQUIRED TO TELL THE TRUTH. That is what FOX SAYS ITSELF. So were they lying then...or now?
I have a lot of respect for Chris Wallace. He is not some ultra right wing zealot. If Chris Wallace is saying this about the White House, I believe him. He has a lot of credibility.
I agree.
He's less polarizing than many from FOX or CNN or MSNBC etc
He's a pro....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
