Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:28 PM
obo
 
916 posts, read 985,595 times
Reputation: 204

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
My grandmother was always mad about politics and Obama...just very angry. I found out that she had been sitting in front of Fox news all day. I blocked the channel. She is a much happier person now.
Look at you employing censorship! No wonder you like what Obama and company are doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by enigmaingr View Post
Indeed, the cross section for MSNBC or CNN would mirror your analysis of FOX news, just switch conservative to liberal. All the digs on FOX apply to MSNBC and, to a lessor extent, CNN as well. The difference though is that FOX News and many of their fans like to actively deny that they are a Republican mouthpiece. Why not just admit it? Why not brand it "the voice of the conservative movement" or something? You don't see MSNBC so actively pretending to be something that they are not (fair and balanced).
Kind of hard for Fox News to be a "Republican mouthpiece" when there are this many non-Republicans on that station as hosts or frequent guests:

- Juan Williams
- Geraldo Rivera
- Susan Estrich
- Geraldine Ferraro
- Harold Ford Jr.
- Alan Colmes
- Lis Wiehl
- Bob Beckel
- Ellen Ratner
- Ellis Henican
- Mara Liasson
- Mort Kondracke
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
this is complete bull. it had nothing at all to do with foxnews.

This was from one florida FOX affiliate station and its local news.

you are either misinformed or a liar. please elucidate...
It is amazing how the libs keep repeating that untruth!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:31 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
More proof that you and your ilk would rather restrict personal freedoms than face dissent.

I'll bet you're a big supporter of "net neutrality" and the "fairness doctrine."
Absolutely. I don't care whether she watches fox or the cartoon network...pretty much the same. I do care that she was angry all of the time. I have no idea where she gets her news now. She said that she is glad that she does not watch it anymore. She said that it is kind of addictive. However, since I pay the cable bill...my choice! You want her to watch Fox...you pay the cable bill! Friends don't let friends watch Fox.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
For something to be "propaganda", it has to be false and misleading information. Reporting actual news and events, honestly and truthfully, is not propaganda.

I believe that Fox News (I just don't listen to the other networks anymore, or at least rarely) employs some of the most professional journalists, and has the most honest reporting of any other news organization you can name. Their people are second to none in the business.

Who can take someone like Chris Matthews seriously? He gets a "tingle" up his leg when he hears Obama speak?

And why do the others not report so many important stories? Where have they been in reporting on the numerous Marxist/socialists that are Obama's "czars", whom are advising him on polices that affect all Americans. When did we become a Marxist dictatorship? Why arent' these other news organizations asking questions?

If anything, it is the other so-called "news" organizations that are "not news". They are shills for the Obama White House. They are not worth listening to for five minutes.

They not Fox, represent a "propaganda machine".
According to liberals, anything not far left is "biased."

In the liberal's mind, when Fox runs news which mentions both a positive and negative story about Obama, it is "biased" for mentioning anything negative.

Because Fox News isn't ultra-left, to liberals it is "biased."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,856 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15123
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
More proof that you and your ilk would rather restrict personal freedoms than face dissent.

I'll bet you're a big supporter of "net neutrality" and the "fairness doctrine."
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Absolutely.


You do realize that you - specifically, as well as people like you - are why people like me are saying that this country is headed in the wrong direction, right? If something doesn't agree with your point of view, you'd rather have it silenced than face it. You do realize how morally and ethically wrong that is, right?

As for you paying for the cable, I agree, it's your service and you can dictate what it's used for, but that's not the point, nor is the reason you censored what your grandmother can watch. You're trying to justify your moral deficiencies, and frankly, it's pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Absolutely. I don't care whether she watches fox or the cartoon network...pretty much the same. I do care that she was angry all of the time. I have no idea where she gets her news now. She said that she is glad that she does not watch it anymore. She said that it is kind of addictive. However, since I pay the cable bill...my choice! You want her to watch Fox...you pay the cable bill! Friends don't let friends watch Fox.
If she wants an equal coverage of the news, she is missing out not watching Fox News:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:54 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post


You do realize that you - specifically, as well as people like you - are why people like me are saying that this country is headed in the wrong direction, right? If something doesn't agree with your point of view, you'd rather have it silenced than face it. You do realize how morally and ethically wrong that is, right?

As for you paying for the cable, I agree, it's your service and you can dictate what it's used for, but that's not the point, nor is the reason you censored what your grandmother can watch. You're trying to justify your moral deficiencies, and frankly, it's pathetic.

My moral deficiencies?? I told you Fox makes people angry and mean. Maybe someone should block fox from your T.V. I have porn blocked out on my television as well so my children can not watch that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,856 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15123
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
My moral deficiencies?? I told you Fox makes people angry and mean. Maybe someone should block fox from your T.V. I have porn blocked out on my television as well so my children can not watch that.
Tell yourself whatever you like. Your words are posted and their meaning is clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 03:07 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Tell yourself whatever you like. Your words are posted and their meaning is clear.
That is profound. I never advocated suppressing speech only the fact that I don't have to listen to it or pay for it. In another great move of censorship, I will put you on ignore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top