U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 10-21-2009, 11:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Thumb of Michigan
3,749 posts, read 1,997,395 times
Reputation: 2010
Blue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond repute
Blue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Grass Fever has a reputation beyond repute
Default Witnesses have zero luck slipping fishy math past Franken

Here is the story -- Witnesses have zero luck slipping fishy math past Franken « Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media.

The fearsome Harvard math major punished conservative economist Diana Furchtgott-Roth for claiming that Democrats’ reforms would jack up bankruptcies for medical reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2009, 12:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,649 posts, read 631,809 times
Reputation: 351
compJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nice

YouTube - Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies

Its worth watching and I think more people will notice it if its in the thread.

By the way, who is that girl in the background?
She looks bored but I love her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 12:44 AM
E +5.75 / S +1.0
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
GOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post

YouTube - Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies

Its worth watching and I think more people will notice it if its in the thread.

By the way, who is that girl in the background?
She looks bored but I love her.

Uh, mmm, uh, can you tell me how much the average, um, uh, citizen pays for healthcare in France or um, uh Germany for their free healthcare, Mr. Franken? I can tell you the number is about 10% of their salary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 12:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,649 posts, read 631,809 times
Reputation: 351
compJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D View Post
Uh, mmm, uh, can you tell me how much the average, um, uh, citizen pays for healthcare in France or um, uh Germany for their free healthcare, Mr. Franken? I can tell you the number is about 10% of their salary.
In 2008, the average premium for a family plan purchased through an employer was $12,680

How many families are making less than $126,800 per year, I wonder.
As that is how many are paying more than 10% of their income in the US
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 12:56 AM
E +5.75 / S +1.0
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
GOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post
In 2008, the average premium for a family plan purchased through an employer was $12,680

How many families are making less than $126,800 per year, I wonder.
As that is how many are paying more than 10% of their income in the US

um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.

And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.

I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 12:58 AM
The Most Interesting Pokemon In The World
Status: "God please watch over and bless Haiti." (set 25 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lost Wilderness
7,427 posts, read 3,784,980 times
Reputation: 2580
Lucario has a reputation beyond repute
Lucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond reputeLucario has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D View Post
um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.

And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.

I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.

What's the alternative?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 01:04 AM
Intumescent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Temple, GA
2,193 posts, read 619,823 times
Reputation: 661
jetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to beholdjetgraphics is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via Skype™ to jetgraphics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunil's Dad View Post
What's the alternative?
How about this:
UNIVERSAL health care means everyone can care for anyone
[] Decriminalize giving health care;
[] Decriminalize the trade and possession of medicine and equipment;
[] Expand opportunities for medical education;
[] Offer credentials by government supervised examination, regardless of where or how one learned medicine; and
[] Eliminate tort abuse with "Satisfaction guaranteed, or your money back!"

In parallel, I'd suggest that Americans stop volunteering into national socialism. You do know that there is no law that compels Americans to enroll, nor any law that punishes those who do not participate. It is 100% voluntary - voluntary servitude. That's how it bypasses the constitutional prohibition on involuntary servitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 01:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,649 posts, read 631,809 times
Reputation: 351
compJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nicecompJockey is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D View Post
um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.

And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.

I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.
Its paid for.
And lowers the deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 01:09 AM
E +5.75 / S +1.0
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
GOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunil's Dad View Post
What's the alternative?

There is no alternative. All those in favor of a public option or sickness fund or similar need to face reality: there are no free lunches. We simply can't tax the rich enough or cut enough elsewhere to fund it. The Democrats will have to raise taxes.

A guy making $30K a year might take home $900 every two weeks right now. That is without health insurance. His net pay would drop to $785 to cover his 10%. For most of these guys, $300 a month would not fit into their budget right now. The practical solution is to begin phasing in the tax over three years. 3% the first year, 6% the second year, and 10% the third year. The economy as a whole will have to adjust. The increase in dollars to the healthcare industry will be offset elsewhere. Most likely housing and autos.

The Demmies know this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 01:10 AM
E +5.75 / S +1.0
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
GOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud ofGOPATTA2D has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post
Its paid for.
And lowers the deficit.

Friends shouldn't let friends bad at math debate in public forums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top