|

10-22-2009, 12:44 AM
|
|
E +5.75 / S +1.0
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey
|
Uh, mmm, uh, can you tell me how much the average, um, uh, citizen pays for healthcare in France or um, uh Germany for their free healthcare, Mr. Franken? I can tell you the number is about 10% of their salary.
|
|

10-22-2009, 12:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,649 posts, read 631,809 times
Reputation: 351
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D
Uh, mmm, uh, can you tell me how much the average, um, uh, citizen pays for healthcare in France or um, uh Germany for their free healthcare, Mr. Franken? I can tell you the number is about 10% of their salary.
|
In 2008, the average premium for a family plan purchased through an employer was $12,680
How many families are making less than $126,800 per year, I wonder.
As that is how many are paying more than 10% of their income in the US
|
|

10-22-2009, 12:56 AM
|
|
E +5.75 / S +1.0
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey
In 2008, the average premium for a family plan purchased through an employer was $12,680
How many families are making less than $126,800 per year, I wonder.
As that is how many are paying more than 10% of their income in the US
|
um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.
And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.
I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.
|
|

10-22-2009, 12:58 AM
|
|
The Most Interesting Pokemon In The World
Status:
"God please watch over and bless Haiti."
(set 25 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lost Wilderness
7,427 posts, read 3,784,980 times
Reputation: 2580
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D
um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.
And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.
I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.
|
What's the alternative?
|
|

10-22-2009, 01:04 AM
|
|
Intumescent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Temple, GA
2,193 posts, read 619,823 times
Reputation: 661
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunil's Dad
What's the alternative?
|
How about this:
UNIVERSAL health care means everyone can care for anyone
[] Decriminalize giving health care;
[] Decriminalize the trade and possession of medicine and equipment;
[] Expand opportunities for medical education;
[] Offer credentials by government supervised examination, regardless of where or how one learned medicine; and
[] Eliminate tort abuse with "Satisfaction guaranteed, or your money back!"
In parallel, I'd suggest that Americans stop volunteering into national socialism. You do know that there is no law that compels Americans to enroll, nor any law that punishes those who do not participate. It is 100% voluntary - voluntary servitude. That's how it bypasses the constitutional prohibition on involuntary servitude.
|
|

10-22-2009, 01:04 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,649 posts, read 631,809 times
Reputation: 351
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOPATTA2D
um, uh, mm, how many families pay 100% of the family premium? Since, um, uh, we are quoting averages, um, uh, what was the average employer sponsorship, um. I have that number - 60% for family plans. um, uh, what was the average family portion? About $5K. Average income? $55K. Just under ten percent.
And that is my point. It is not cheap. Everyone needs to pay 10% or so of their income to fund reform and guaranteed coverage to all Americans. Everyone. The problem is that it is deemed too expensive by the Democrats. They don't want someone earning $30K a year to pay $3K a year in payroll tax. They want the "rich" to pay more so they can give it to them free.
I said it before, I'll say it again: you guys want it, you better be prepared to pay for it.
|
Its paid for.
And lowers the deficit.
|
|

10-22-2009, 01:09 AM
|
|
E +5.75 / S +1.0
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunil's Dad
What's the alternative?
|
There is no alternative. All those in favor of a public option or sickness fund or similar need to face reality: there are no free lunches. We simply can't tax the rich enough or cut enough elsewhere to fund it. The Democrats will have to raise taxes.
A guy making $30K a year might take home $900 every two weeks right now. That is without health insurance. His net pay would drop to $785 to cover his 10%. For most of these guys, $300 a month would not fit into their budget right now. The practical solution is to begin phasing in the tax over three years. 3% the first year, 6% the second year, and 10% the third year. The economy as a whole will have to adjust. The increase in dollars to the healthcare industry will be offset elsewhere. Most likely housing and autos.
The Demmies know this.
|
|

10-22-2009, 01:10 AM
|
|
E +5.75 / S +1.0
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
3,961 posts, read 1,140,054 times
Reputation: 1093
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey
Its paid for.
And lowers the deficit.
|
Friends shouldn't let friends bad at math debate in public forums.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|