Revealed: Who else was at that secret Obama briefing with Olby and Maddow? (legal, CNN)

[Rosinante]

Originally Posted by bentlebee

Not Fox news!


Too bad the troops didn't have to attend.....they are left out there begging for a decision!

On Monday, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow were among several people who attended an off-the-record briefing with Pres. Obama at the White House. Sources tell us other attendees at the two-and-a-half hour chat included Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post, Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Gwen Ifill of PBS and Gloria Borger of CNN. Perhaps not surprisingly, no one from Fox News was in the room.

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Revealed: Who else was at that secret Obama briefing with Olby and Maddow?

Well, bentlebee, anyone with any sense knows that the reason Fox News wasn't at the meeting where lackeys Olbermann and Maddow were getting their orders for broadcasts is that Fox insists on reporting the truth.

The fact is that until Obama's Brown Shirts come in to machinegun the news reporters on Fox, it will be the ONLY source of uncensored news. Of course, it will mean that many of the libs who get their propaganda from the likes of Bozo Keith will need to have a dictionary handy. Some of you will need to have an interpreter at the ready since there often many multi-syllable words in their reports. A dictionary might prove a bit much since that requires the ability to spell.

Having explained that, it is clear that many recognize that many of the lefties that post here are so gullible that the President Zero processing machine knows it has you right where they want you — behind the eight ball.

[Bluefly]

Originally Posted by Rosinante

Well, bentlebee, anyone with any sense knows that the reason Fox News wasn't at the meeting where lackeys Olbermann and Maddow were getting their orders for broadcasts is that Fox insists on reporting the truth.

The fact is that until Obama's Brown Shirts come in to machinegun the news reporters on Fox, it will be the ONLY source of uncensored news. Of course, it will mean that many of the libs who get their propaganda from the likes of Bozo Keith will need to have a dictionary handy. Some of you will need to have an interpreter at the ready since there often many multi-syllable words in their reports. A dictionary might prove a bit much since that requires the ability to spell.

Having explained that, it is clear that many recognize that many of the lefties that post here are so gullible that the President Zero processing machine knows it has you right where they want you — behind the eight ball.

Just because you want to have your beliefs reinforced doesn't mean the outlet that does that is reporting the truth.

Fox's lies and manipulations have been pointed out ad nauseum. Watch the video of Murdock admitting that he rigs Fox to support radical conservatism.

The jig is up, kiddo. The owner of Fox admitted that it's fixed. There's nothing else to say, especially anything having to do with them speaking truth.

They aren't, and the sooner your recognize that the sooner you'll take off your partisan blinders and start seeing the world as it really is. Neither left nor right.

[Casper in Dallas]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

Undoubtedly the most hilarious post from you that I have ever seen. How many hours a day was it you said you watch Fox? How about at the 4:00 pm hour? Yep, I know that guy is wild and lies all the time. How many lies did you count from him yesterday?

Gald that I can still amuse you Roy.
I have never said that the MSM is not bias and agree that they do lean to the left in their reporting. In fact if you think back a ways you will remember that I agree that they do. FOX, on the other-hand, has taken "leaning" to an entirely new level. That is their choice but in making it they should not be surprsied that they may not be all that welcome by those they attack. I would also remind you, as others already have here (with no replies), that this is nothing new, Presidents do this all the time. Where was your outrage when President Bush did the same? Or better yet, where was your outrage when President Bush held closed door meetings to descide on which companies would get the lions share of government contracts (money) in Iraq? We all know whos supposedly ex-company that was that walked away with the largest piece of the pie. This all happening right after telling us all that he would run and open and accountable government. Where was your outrage then Roy? Funny I do not recall you having any at the time.
Yes, Roy, I do listen to FOX "news", nearly every day at lunch and sometimes for an hour in the evening. I have heard more than a few commentaries presented as though they were news and all the facts. Once an organization leans far enough and other view points are totally squashed they have become an arm of a political organization and should understand that they will be treated as such by others. FOX can play the victim all they want, seems to be the fad these days, just do not expect everyone else to buy it.
Casper

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Bluefly

Just because you want to have your beliefs reinforced doesn't mean the outlet that does that is reporting the truth.

Fox's lies and manipulations have been pointed out ad nauseum. Watch the video of Murdock admitting that he rigs Fox to support radical conservatism.

The jig is up, kiddo. The owner of Fox admitted that it's fixed. There's nothing else to say, especially anything having to do with them speaking truth.

They aren't, and the sooner your recognize that the sooner you'll take off your partisan blinders and start seeing the world as it really is. Neither left nor right.

I see that you are all worked up to take my challenge to watch Beck's show yesterday and come up with the lies he told. I will await your answer since I didn't find any among all his proclamations. Please provide support for your claims. Who knows you may even reform me and get me away from listening to them.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas

Gald that I can still amuse you Roy.
I have never said that the MSM is not bias and agree that they do lean to the left in their reporting. In fact if you think back a ways you will remember that I agree that they do. FOX, on the other-hand, has taken "leaning" to an entirely new level. That is their choice but in making it they should not be surprsied that they may not be all that welcome by those they attack. I would also remind you, as others already have here (with no replies), that this is nothing new, Presidents do this all the time. Where was your outrage when President Bush did the same? Or better yet, where was your outrage when President Bush held closed door meetings to descide on which companies would get the lions share of government contracts (money) in Iraq? We all know whos supposedly ex-company that was that walked away with the largest piece of the pie. This all happening right after telling us all that he would run and open and accountable government. Where was your outrage then Roy? Funny I do not recall you having any at the time.
Yes, Roy, I do listen to FOX "news", nearly every day at lunch and sometimes for an hour in the evening. I have heard more than a few commentaries presented as though they were news and all the facts. Once an organization leans far enough and other view points are totally squashed they have become an arm of a political organization and should understand that they will be treated as such by others. FOX can play the victim all they want, seems to be the fad these days, just do not expect everyone else to buy it.
Casper

Well if you watch Fox during the noon hour you at least get to see my favorite blonde on their daytime hours, Martha McCallum. I love her voice but I do detect a too much right lean in her talk now and then. I don't think you remember that I used to cry about having to watch CNN because Fox wasn't on my program with Dish. Well now for about 10 months I have been watching Fox because for some reason they put them on.

I don't watch Fox much after Beck is finished but I have it on as background noise for the objectionable parts of it. You should tape Beck daily so you can make him your nightly hour or so. Better yet there is a group that affords everybody the opportunity to watch him instead of having to bad mouth him without ever seeing him. You can see him at Glenn Beck Clips Week 43

Seriously speaking, I did find it a bit funny that Oba mao's attack dogs were out on Sunday and the very next morning they had a meeting that I am sure that nobody from Fox was invited to. Yep, I imagine some orders were handed out in that meeting.

Hey how long before Jake Tapper has to work for Fox to be employed? Anyone who wants to answer this question is invited to do it. Some others from ABC have made the switch, some recently and one of their main ones, Brit Hume some years ago.

[bentlebee]

Obama seems to take Olderman and Maddows as serious reporters, doesn't that say enough about Obama and again nice associations....

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by bentlebee

Obama seems to take Olderman and Maddows as serious reporters, doesn't that say enough about Obama and again nice associations....

For me it says a lot. Of course, I am not a prog so I can see your point.

[Bluefly]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

I see that you are all worked up to take my challenge to watch Beck's show yesterday and come up with the lies he told. I will await your answer since I didn't find any among all his proclamations. Please provide support for your claims. Who knows you may even reform me and get me away from listening to them.

Well, perhaps you've issued some new challenge. In the past, I have given you evidence upon evidence upon evidence of Beck lying. Cited sources and all.

You have failed to respond.

So, when I get some time I'll check out your clip. Maybe he's not lying in that particular one. I don't know yet. But, what he does is present a statement made by someone (which is factual), then the lies come in his interpretation. He distorts peoples' intentions beyond recognition. Usually something to do with them wanting to destroy our country with communism or something.

The latest absurdity was linking volunteerism to Maoism.



So, he has no crediblity. He's a joke, Roy. It's been proven time and time again. You should saddle your horse with someone more credible. O'Reilly isn't too bad. He's intelligent and gives equal footing to all sides, unlike Hannity, Coulter, Rush, and Beck.

I remember when O'Reilly told Beck he's a populist and Beck said "I've been doing this long before it was popular." O'Reilly was like, "No. Populist. Not popular." You could just see O'Reilly thinking, "Are you really this stupid?"

Beck had no clue.

[Casper in Dallas]

Originally Posted by Bluefly

Well, perhaps you've issued some new challenge. In the past, I have given you evidence upon evidence upon evidence of Beck lying. Cited sources and all.

You have failed to respond.

So, when I get some time I'll check out your clip. Maybe he's not lying in that particular one. I don't know yet. But, what he does is present a statement made by someone (which is factual), then the lies come in his interpretation. He distorts peoples' intentions beyond recognition. Usually something to do with them wanting to destroy our country with communism or something.

The latest absurdity was linking volunteerism to Maoism.



So, he has no crediblity. He's a joke, Roy. It's been proven time and time again. You should saddle your horse with someone more credible. O'Reilly isn't too bad. He's intelligent and gives equal footing to all sides, unlike Hannity, Coulter, Rush, and Beck.

I remember when O'Reilly told Beck he's a populist and Beck said "I've been doing this long before it was popular." O'Reilly was like, "No. Populist. Not popular." You could just see O'Reilly thinking, "Are you really this stupid?"

Beck had no clue.

Oh, you have gone and done it now, you attacked Beck and even included his favorite girl, Anne Get Your Gun. O'Reilly was a good suggestion but I doubt he will spend much time there since sooner or later he will dare disagree with the words of those you named above and that is not acceptable in the right-handed play book.
Funny, the first time I heard Beck I wondered why they let someone drink before going on air. He was all over the place and for the life of me I just could not seem to get whatever point he was attempting to make, I suspect he wasn't. Yes, on occasion, like Ann, he can make sense, but also like her, once he gets rolling he seems to lose it and go off on a rant. Not a good way to get "News" in my opinion.
Casper

[Tightwad]

Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu

Thus, it was one sided. Um, you understand what that means right?

Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu

LOL @ people that think that the news media outlets which report stories in the same light as what they agree are somehow not biased.

For petes sake, HAVE YOU SEEN Maddow's show? Talk about a mouth piece. But she is ok, because it is in agreement with your beliefs.

Give me a break. Some of you people crack me up.

Easy there. You'll grow up someday so that english isn't a foreign language.