Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:23 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,145,685 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

"...The estimate includes a projected net cost of $518 billion over 10 years for the proposed expansions in insurance coverage. That net cost itself reflects a gross total of $829 billion in credits and subsidies provided through the exchanges, increased net outlays for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and tax credits for small employers; those costs are partly offset by $201 billion in revenues from the excise tax on high-premium insurance plans and $110 billion in net savings from other sources.

"The net cost of the coverage expansions would be more than offset by the combination of other spending changes that CBO estimates would save $404 billion over the 10 years and other provisions that JCT and CBO
estimate would increase federal revenues by $196 billion over the same period."

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc...cus_letter.pdf

The Clarification appendix pp. 25-27 is helpful too.

title comes from this page that links to the CBO report: CBO Says Finance Health Reform Bill Will Save $81 Billion Over a Decade « The Washington Independent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,797 posts, read 40,996,819 times
Reputation: 62174
Is it true the CBO only costs what they tell them to cost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:28 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,145,685 times
Reputation: 6195
Yes, the CBO lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:30 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
"The net cost of the coverage expansions would be more than offset by the combination of other spending changes that CBO estimates would save $404 billion over the 10 years and other provisions that JCT and CBO
i.e. rationing care...

Lets also forget that the tax revenue will be for 10 years, while the care will be for 7.. Need to add 3 more years of costs into the equation to make a fair comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:34 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,145,685 times
Reputation: 6195
"An amendment adopted by the committee would require that, beginning in 2012, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) certify annually whether or not the provisions of the legislation are projected to increase the budget deficit in the coming year. If the Director determined that they were projected to increase the deficit, he or she would be required to notify the Congress, and exchange subsidies would be automatically adjusted to avoid the estimated increase in the deficit for that year."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:36 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
"An amendment adopted by the committee would require that, beginning in 2012, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) certify annually whether or not the provisions of the legislation are projected to increase the budget deficit in the coming year. If the Director determined that they were projected to increase the deficit, he or she would be required to notify the Congress, and exchange subsidies would be automatically adjusted to avoid the estimated increase in the deficit for that year."
i.e. rationing care..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,810,847 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
i.e. rationing care...
Yeah, costs can't be cut, and facilities more accessible without rationing.

For examples, many conservatives believe that if everybody had health insurance, it will affect them adversely in getting treatment. So, rationing, to ensure not everybody can get to the hospital, is the best thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:38 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Yeah, costs can't be cut, and facilities more accessible without rationing.
if the govt is going to cut their subsidies, the hospitals have to cut back.

Do you think the money for equipment, doctors, nurses, medicine will come from no where?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
For examples, many conservatives believe that if everybody had health insurance, it will affect them adversely in getting treatment. So, rationing, to ensure not everybody can get to the hospital, is the best thing to do.
Conservatives dont believe that at all. Do you often need to makeup arguments of the other side in order to argue your own?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:38 AM
 
1,062 posts, read 1,018,502 times
Reputation: 402
This report was released Oct 7, pertaining to the Baucus bill. I believe there were some changes made since then. Not sure that this report still applies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2009, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,783,813 times
Reputation: 3550
Too bad the CBO won't rate a single-payer system.

They know it will save money but if they actually put it out there...the people might demand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top