U.S. Cities  
Happy New Year 2010!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
8,636 posts, read 3,903,682 times
Reputation: 2457
macmeal has a reputation beyond repute
macmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond reputemacmeal has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastwesteastagain View Post
Because forcing people to denounce their religion is the American way, right?
A perfectly reasonable question....to which I'll give a reasonable answer.

"SHOULD people in America be forced to denounce..(or at least, modify parts of) their religion?" That's a fair question. The answer would be, "that depends entirely on what their religion demands of them, and whether those demands put other people at risk".

If you religion asks that you sing funny songs....wear funny clothes...or worship funny things..or believe in magic...then of course, you should be free to practice your religion; this is America.

But if your religion requires you to hate others...to eliminate 'enemies'...to jeopardize public safety...or to intimidate and harrass others..(human sacrifice, animal cruelty, cannibalism, revenge killings?).....then perhaps you may not be able to practice ALL of your religion; you might have to 'tone it down' just a bit.

Good question, though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
372 posts, read 115,747 times
Reputation: 179
eastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobolt View Post
It seems to be that way with the left and all the ACLU whackjobs who want to take the Christ out of Christmas, give us holiday trees and all this other tripe, so to answer your question: yes.
See, and there I thought I was being all rhetorical and tongue-in-cheek.

BTW, I think I'm considered left leaning and I'm all for keeping Christ in Christmas and Christmas trees and they can even be on public property as long as other religious icons can also be on public property. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.....but either way, no one is suggesting kicking Christians out of the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
2,657 posts, read 603,881 times
Reputation: 1002
citizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud of
Anybody been to Dearborn, Michigan??? IT IS TOTALLY INSANE UP THERE!! I can't even believe that the things I saw were allowed in this country.

Check this out....

YouTube - Arab Festival 2009: Sharia in the US
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:20 PM
Who's Czary Now? Psalm 109:8
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
3,572 posts, read 721,834 times
Reputation: 1058
dcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud ofdcsldcd has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Christmas is not a religious holiday for some of us, and as far as I know, there's nothing in our laws that says that it is.

Considering Christmas is a Christian religious holiday (the celebration of Christ's birth) it is curious why the non-believers even celebrate it. It is the heighth of hypocrocy or greed (give me free stuff). Why partake in this religious holiday marking Christ's birth? Law or no law it has always been a religious holiday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
372 posts, read 115,747 times
Reputation: 179
eastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by macmeal View Post
A perfectly reasonable question....to which I'll give a reasonable answer.

"SHOULD people in America be forced to denounce..(or at least, modify parts of) their religion?" That's a fair question. The answer would be, "that depends entirely on what their religion demands of them, and whether those demands put other people at risk".

If you religion asks that you sing funny songs....wear funny clothes...or worship funny things..or believe in magic...then of course, you should be free to practice your religion; this is America.

But if your religion requires you to hate others...to eliminate 'enemies'...to jeopardize public safety...or to intimidate and harrass others..(human sacrifice, animal cruelty, cannibalism, revenge killings?).....then perhaps you may not be able to practice ALL of your religion; you might have to 'tone it down' just a bit.

Good question, though...
Thanks - good answers also. I fully agree that when one's freedom (religious or otherwise) impinges on others' safety, safety must come first (I believe that US law agrees with me on this).

I think the follow up I have is: since not all sects of Islam require or even condone violence (yes, I know all of the quotes from the Prophet about killing infidels), why are some suggesting "going after" all Muslims? Wouldn't it be just the extremists (i.e., literal interpretation of infidels, jihad, etc.) that would be the risk to our national security? In which case, why not just go after extreme sects?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 04:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
372 posts, read 115,747 times
Reputation: 179
eastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
I totally agree with you. These people have no loyality and will never have any loyality to this country. Their loyality is to Islam and we are the enemy of Islam. There are christian Arabs that have no problem in other countries but the believers in Islam are taught to hate anyone that is not a muslim.
I thought the US was fighting a war on terror, not a war on Islam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 05:03 PM
HIF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NEFL
7,184 posts, read 5,148,523 times
Reputation: 6413
HIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond repute
HIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond reputeHIF has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
Let me put it this way: Japanese Americans were interred in WW2 and they were far LESS of a threat then than Muslim Americans are today. (Zero Americans were killed by Japanese Americans, while 3,000 Americans have been killed since 2001 by Muslim Americans) You also can't get past the fact that in their religion non Muslims MUST be killed or forced to pay extra taxes and submit to Muslim authority.

I don't think Americans should do anything violent against the ones that are here at all, but I do think we should start sending them all packing in a humane, civilized way. Arab Mosques around the US are trying to convert all low income Black and Hispanic Americans into radical anti American Muslims - if they succeed America's goose is cooked.
You really can't play the quote the Karan without playing quote the Christian bible. And when you do that, your theory is without merit.

How big of you that you don't think Americans should do anything violent against the ones that are here now. Do you even have any friends that are Muslim? Have you ever worked with any?

I have news for you, extremist Christian sects are also courting Latinos and poor Blacks, as well.

The reactionary views on this thread show an intolerance that will harm this country much more than "allowing" Muslims, many second, third and even fourth generation American citizens, to remain here.

How do you feel about the American paramilitary hate groups that are growing like leavening bread throughout our country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 05:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
2,657 posts, read 603,881 times
Reputation: 1002
citizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastwesteastagain View Post
I thought the US was fighting a war on terror, not a war on Islam.
But it seems that Islam is fighting a war on the U.S.


I guess that's okay....right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
372 posts, read 115,747 times
Reputation: 179
eastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura abouteastwesteastagain has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post
But it seems that Islam is fighting a war on the U.S.


I guess that's okay....right?
No, of course that's not OK.

I agree that Islamic extremists are fighting a war with the US. And the US is fighting a war with these extremists and those terrorists who are targeting our nation and our citizens.

That's different than the poster who said the US is fighting a war on/against Islam.

Last edited by eastwesteastagain; 11-07-2009 at 05:27 PM.. Reason: can't type
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2009, 05:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
2,657 posts, read 603,881 times
Reputation: 1002
citizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud ofcitizenkane2 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastwesteastagain View Post
No, of course that's not OK.

I agree that Islamic extremists are fighting a war with the US. And the US is fighting a war with these extremists and those terrorists who are targeting our nation and our citizens.

That's different than the poster who said the US is fighting a war on/against Islam.

Well I guiess when Muslims start weeding out the so-called extremists from amongst themselves......when they start ratting them out....that's when we'll make a distinction.

Until then ...Islam is at war with the U.S. That's how I see it. After this week, I'm fed up. I don't want to hear any more. Get your Muslim house in ORDER ! Period!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top