Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-11-2009, 06:58 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
15,318 posts, read 17,217,577 times
Reputation: 6959

Advertisements

It was a Democratic congress that voted to give tax payer money to the fat cats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:02 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 4,627,449 times
Reputation: 1671
There is nothing wrong with socialism, as long as you leave it in the textbooks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:02 PM
 
805 posts, read 1,509,768 times
Reputation: 734
There's nothing wrong with socialism if you are happy living in such countries that give you a high standard of living and security net (free college tuition, free health care, 5 weeks of paid vacation, and guaranteed senior pension) with a high-tax price tag.

I don't see people from Scandinavia and Western Europe trying to immigrate to the US in droves. So they are content.

The question is, are WE content here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,261,277 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by clue View Post
Folks, the following items are based on socialism:

Highways.
Public schools.
Police.
Fire.
Public hospitals.
Medicare.
Armed forces.
Rail.
FDA.

Now, would you like to remove socialism from all of that and privatize everything?
I am sure that you don't really understand what socialism is. Let me try to help your thinking.

Highways have been paid for with tax money, one way or another, because the Constitution says the government should do what it can to promote trade among the states. Highways were necessary from the beginning and that is not socialism..

Police is not an example of socialism since governments are supposed to protect the people from each other. Not at all socialism. Fire departments are the same as police are.

Public hospitals are the same as fire and police with the safety of the people.

Medicare. You finally came close but do you know that we SS people have about $140 deducted from our SS checks to pay into Medicare. It is not as much socialism as you socialists like to think.

Armed forces. Who protects the nation from outsiders with an armed force? Again, it is not an example of socialism.

Rail. Where would we be without the government taking over the railroads? Have you ever looked at the number of trailers on rail cars? Does it not appear that one train can haul many of those things when you want it done over the socialized highways (your words not mine) and those roads would go down even faster than they do now.

FDA Where did you find that as an example of socialism? Down at the local socialist society meeting hall?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,785,443 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by aqua0 View Post
There's nothing wrong with socialism if you are happy living in such countries that give you a high standard of living and security net (free college tuition, free health care, 5 weeks of paid vacation, and guaranteed senior pension) with a high-tax price tag.

I don't see people from Scandinavia and Western Europe trying to immigrate to the US in droves. So they are content.

The question is, are WE content here?
Nope.

If the immigration process wasn't so daunting, I'd gladly move to one of those countries.
France seems nice along with Sweden. Germany isn't bad. I wouldn't mind seeing a bunch of goths and having a nice public transportation system in Berlin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,261,277 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
As i said.... McCarthy would be so proud of some on here.
How old are you? I don't think you were around in the 1950s when McCarthy was so popular. I was 18 in 1950 and I was a liberal Democrat all through the 50s so I was taken in by the liberals where McCarthy was concerned. Finally, I made the switch when the Dems nominated an admitted socialist for the Presidency, George McGovern.

I now know that people who have studied the McCarthy era now think that if he had been successful we would be better off.

I can guarantee you that in those early years of the Cold War there was plenty of reason to be afraid of Communism. Those didn't live through those years really don't know much about the period or the threat of Communism coupled with the threat of the atom bomb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,785,443 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzie679 View Post
China just approved single payer universal health coverage to start in 2011.
Really?

I know for a while people were left up to the free market and people were dying. Sound familiar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:12 PM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,845,129 times
Reputation: 2059
I'm lucky tht i can use both systems...... lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:12 PM
Itz
 
714 posts, read 2,199,023 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by aqua0 View Post
There's nothing wrong with socialism if you are happy living in such countries that give you a high standard of living and security net (free college tuition, free health care, 5 weeks of paid vacation, and guaranteed senior pension) with a high-tax price tag.

I don't see people from Scandinavia and Western Europe trying to immigrate to the US in droves. So they are content.

The question is, are WE content here?

Question... How do you know those in Western Europe and Scandinavia are conent? You mention they aren't immigrating to the US... so that must be the case? Neither are Russians, Japanese, Chinese (Communistic states)... Just curious... Because in Norway a regular hamburger will cost you over $30, a sweater over $200... they don't live in McMansions, Drive HUGE SUVs nor send their children to private institutions to be taught how to grow up... Maybe its not the political system but the family structure and their lack of greed that makes them content.

In the US.. its ALL about the money... the bigger house, the bigger car, the name brands... people in the US don't care about their fellow human beings (ie... the gang rape that everyone watched for hours.....).. (ie the amount of people that we drive by that are homeless everyday and yet complain because our govt isn't doing anything about it)..

What about the job aspect... is it because of the greed (theres that word again) that employers want to hire illegals at a LOWER cost of money (those same illegals that stole someones identity) or how about our high tech jobs that go to H1 Visas from India instead of the college graduate supporting a family?

People always go back to the healthcare and school systems... what people don't understand is that European healthcare IS rationed, they have panels that REFUSE to give treatment based on "life expectancy" they REFUSE to give treatment that costs more money.. (please look up information and news articles in regards to this..sorry I don't have sources but will provide if absolutely necessary). Their education is SUPERIOR because the US is SO worried about hurting someones feelings and trying to be PC we don't care about how intelligent our children are - we care about if they FEEL GOOD! (GIMME GIMME, MINE MINE MINE)

Just some thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 07:13 PM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,845,129 times
Reputation: 2059
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovemycomputer90 View Post
It was a Democratic congress that voted to give tax payer money to the fat cats.
Bush was a Democrat????????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top