Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:47 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,018,970 times
Reputation: 2521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
and, how did we afford them all these years? It must have been a miracle.

More like a nightmare.

Defense spending is now 20 percent more than it was in 1985 and has risen 43 percent since 1998.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, defense spending currently constitutes more than half of U.S. domestic discretionary spending -- that is, the part of the federal budget that is not spent on mandatory items like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.


"Quite bluntly," analyst Stephen Daggett of the non-partisan Congressional Research Service told a little-noticed hearing of the House Budget Committee last week, "the cost of everything we have been doing in defense has been accelerating upward too fast even for growing budgets to keep up."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:51 AM
 
921 posts, read 1,132,186 times
Reputation: 1599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Please explain your impatience.



Bush stumbled in Afghanistan for eight years. This gave you no heartburn. Obama has had 10 months and you're going ballistic.

What gives?
This is just another reason for the "Obama Bashers" to whine, & argue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:52 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett_Butler View Post
We didn't and couldn't...... It's this thing called "Defecit Spending" you see..... Our government hasn't been very responsible on that front.

There was a time in the last 15 years though when a President WAS able to balance the budget, and you are actually on the right path in that he did so in large part with cutbacks on military spending.....


Call the pope! It was a F'n miracle!!
What does this have to do with our President's long hesitation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:55 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
More like a nightmare.

I'm glad the majority doesn't think like that.
You don't value your protection very much.
It is a miracle that it went on so long and still does.
Lets eliminate the military. If not reduce it's size.
....... OOOOO, Kay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:58 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett_Butler View Post
This typifies your responses here and you accuse others of "no substance." ???

You don't refute anything with fact, you just say, "That shows how dumb you are.... Pwned!!! "...

I think Napolean said that to Wellington after the Battle of Waterloo: "Eh Wellington? How ya like me NOW!!! You've been PWNED!!!! "




Your so far off topic, your going to need a map and a picture to get back on coarse.

I got you all riled up by presenting facts to you and now your going every which way to divert off your ignorance.
Powned
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 09:59 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,583,949 times
Reputation: 2606
Talking I like you. You're funny.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Call the pope! It was a F'n miracle!!
What does this have to do with our President's long hesitation?

Conservos: Bush's 8 years of mismanagement = OK, Obama's careful consideration = dithering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
This thread has morphed into the typical "brain fart" phase. Too bad, it was interesting for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:03 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Conservos: Bush's 8 years of mismanagement = OK, Obama's careful consideration = dithering.


While at WAR, holding on to the rear flank is very important, even if there is no live theater there.

But you know absolutely nothing about war, except it cost lives and money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:18 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,583,949 times
Reputation: 2606
Talking A hero!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
While at WAR, holding on to the rear flank is very important, even if there is no live theater there.

But you know absolutely nothing about war, except it cost lives and money.
You've seen a couple of black and white WWII movies.

This guy agrees with you.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:21 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,312,855 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
While at WAR, holding on to the rear flank is very important, even if there is no live theater there.

But you know absolutely nothing about war, except it cost lives and money.
You sound like you think the war over there is being fought in trenches with a clearly defined front line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top